[00:00:11]
I CALL THIS MEETING OF PLANNING AND ZONING. REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER AT 633. LET HER KNOW THAT THERE IS A QUORUM PRESENT. PUBLIC COMMENTS. NON-AGENDA ITEM. PUBLIC COMMENTS. WHITE CARDS. COMMENTS WILL BE TAKEN FROM THE AUDIENCE ON NON-AGENDA RELATED TOPIC FOR THE LENGTH OF TIME TO NOT EXCEED THREE MINUTE PER PERSON. AGENDA ITEM. PUBLIC COMMENT. YELLOW CARD COMMENTS WILL BE TAKEN FROM THE AUDIENCE ON. NON-AGENDA AND AGENDA ITEM COMBINED FOR THE LENGTH OF TIME TO NOT TO EXCEED FIVE MINUTES PER TOTAL. PER PERSON ON ALL ITEMS. EXCEED FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS. COMMENT ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS MUST BE MADE WITH ITEM COMES BEFORE THE BOARD COMMISSION, COMMITTEE AND NOT TO EXCEED TWO MINUTES PER PERSON.
NON-ACTION OR DISCUSSION MAY BE TAKEN BY THE BOARD, COMMISSION, COMMITTEE DURING PUBLIC COMMENTS OR NON AGENDA ITEM. TO ADDRESS THE BOARD. COMMISSION. COMMITTEE. PLEASE COMPLETE THE WHITE AND YELLOW AND PRESENT THE ITEM TO THE CITY STAFF DESIGNATED PRIOR TO THE MEETING.
[PUBLIC HEARING]
GOING ON TO PUBLIC HEARING. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A REZONING APPLICATION FOR ONE LOT ON 0.9596 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, AND BEING LOCATED AT 13 100 GREEN BERRY DRIVE, MAYNARD, TEXAS, FROM A SF TWO SINGLE FAMILY STANDARD TO C1 LIGHT COMMERCIAL. WE DO HAVE PAGE BACON, DOES NOT WISH TO SPEAK, BUT IS HERE FOR QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONERS. SO THIS ITEM IS A REZONING FOR WHAT IS INTENDED TO BE A PORTION OF THE MAYNARD COMMONS NORTHEAST COMMERCIAL TRACT. IT WAS INITIALLY SUPPOSED TO BE REZONED AFTER ANNEXATION SOME TIME AGO, BUT IT WAS FOR SOME REASON LEFT OUT. SO TO TIE THAT UP, THIS REZONING IS BEING TAKEN CARE OF NOW TO MAKE THE WHOLE PORTION COMMERCIAL AS OPPOSED TO THE MAJORITY OF IT, AND THEN THE SF TWO ON THE CORNER. YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? TAKE A MOTION TO I MOVE. WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM ONE SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER. STENCILING A SECOND BY VICE CHAIR CHAVIS. ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED? MOVING ON. PUBLIC HEARING NUMBER TWO, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONING APPLICATION FOR ONE LOT ON 51.30 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.AND BEING LOCATED AT 140 704 US HIGHWAY 290, MAYNARD, TEXAS FROM SF ONE SINGLE FAMILY, SUBURBAN AND A AGRICULTURE TO C3 COMMERCIAL. I DO HAVE A DARRELL SWENSON. WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME UP? WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK, MR. DURHAM? I WAS GOING TO SPEAK. IS SOMEBODY GOING TO EXPLAIN THE OR ARGUE FOR THE REZONING? SO WHAT? SO THE WAY IT WORKS IS YOU GUYS SPEAK, AND THEN THEY'LL EXPLAIN IT. UNFORTUNATELY, THAT'S THE WAY IT WORKS. YEAH. SORRY ABOUT THAT. SO DO YOU WANT TO COME UP? YES, SIR. AND I HAVE 5 MINUTES OR 2 MINUTES. TWO. YES, SIR. FOR THIS ITEM TWO. OKAY. MY SISTER
[00:05:08]
AND I OWN THE PROPERTY JUST NORTH OF THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. AND ALSO ALONG OLD KIMBRO ROAD JUST TO THE EAST. COTTONWOOD CREEK RUNS DIRECTLY THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THIS PROPERTY. THERE HAVE BEEN 200 YEAR FLOODS IN THE LAST 35 YEARS OF COTTONWOOD CREEK, MAYBE MORE THAT I'M NOT AWARE OF, BUT I WAS THERE FOR TWO OF THEM, AND I WANT TO KNOW IF THAT THERE HAS BEEN SOME SORT OF STUDY ON HOW THE DRAINAGE, COTTONWOOD CREEK IS GOING TO BE AFFECTED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT. AND IF IT'S IF IT'S THERE'S A CONCERN WHERE THE DEVELOPMENT COULD CAUSE FURTHER BACKUP OF THE DRAINAGE OF THE CREEK AND AFFECT OUR PROPERTY. THE OTHER PART OF THE FLOODPLAIN IS THAT WITH THE CREEK RUNNING DIRECTLY THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE PROPERTY, IF IT DOES FLOOD, DOES THE PROPERTY BECOME UNINHABITABLE AND THEY AND THE OWNER ABANDONS IT. AND THEN WE HAVE AN EYESORE OF SOMETHING THAT WAS STARTED AND THEN NOTHING CAME OF IT. THE OTHER THE OTHER ISSUE THAT I HAD SO THAT THAT'S THE FLOODPLAIN AND ISSUE NUMBER TWO IS FM 1100. YOU KNOW, IT'S VERY BUSY. IT'S JUST A22 LANE ROAD. IF THIS IS HEAVY COMMERCIAL, AS IT SAYS, AND THAT MEANS THERE'S GOING TO BE QUITE A BIT OF TRAFFIC THAT COULD POSSIBLY BE ACCESSING THROUGH OLD KIMBRO ROAD. IF 1100 IS NOT WIDENED, THEN DOES IT CREATE EVEN MORE OF A BACKLOG, A LOGJAM OF PEOPLE TRYING TO GET ONTO THE HIGHWAY 290 BECAUSE NOW THERE'S EXTRA TRAFFIC. HAS THAT BEEN CONSIDERED? HAS THERE BEEN GOOD ARGUMENT FOR LEAVING 1100 THE WAY IT IS, OR ARE THERE PLANS TO WIDEN 1100 AT LEAST UP TO OLD KIMBRO ROAD? THAT'S ALL I GOT. THANK YOU, MR. SWENSON. I ALSO HAVE RJ MASON. RJ MASON I HAVE THE PROPERTY AT 14,601 C, US HIGHWAY 290 EAST, WHICH IS DIRECTLY ACROSS 290 FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. LIKE MY PREDECESSOR, I HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT THE EFFECT OF THE ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC ON WHAT'S ALREADY A PRETTY CONGESTED AREA.MORE THAN THAT, I'M NOT SURE WHAT KINDS OF DEVELOPMENT THE C3 HEAVY COMMERCIAL CONTEMPLATES IS. I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT KIND OF DEVELOPMENT THEY'RE PROPOSING FOR THIS. SO THESE ARE MY CONCERNS. THANK YOU, MR. MASON. THAT'S ALL THE YELLOW CARDS WE HAVE, MR. MICHAEL. SO THIS REZONING IS TO ALLOW FOR C3 HEAVY COMMERCIAL, WHICH IS OUR MOST PERMISSIVE ZONING CATEGORY.
IN THEIR LETTER OF INTENT, THEY DO SPECIFY THAT THEY INTEND TO HAVE COMMERCIAL LOTS ON THE SOUTHWESTERN CORNER. AND THEN IN THE FLOODPLAIN AREA ABOVE IT THAT IS INTENDED TO BE RV PARK OR SOMETHING THAT IS ABLE TO BE DONE IN THE FLOODPLAIN. AND I WILL SAVE FURTHER COMMENTS AND DISCUSSION FOR THE REGULAR AGENDA ITEM. ALL RIGHT. UNFORTUNATELY, YOU CAN'T DURING THIS TIME. YES, SIR. WE HAVE A MOTION COMMISSIONERS TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING NUMBER TWO, I MOVE APPROVAL. I MOVE, WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM TWO. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER STETSON. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND, HAVE A MOTION SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NILA. ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND. ALL OPPOSED? MOVING ON TO PUBLIC HEARING NUMBER THREE, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONING APPLICATION FOR SEVEN LOTS ON 146.92 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. AND BEING GENERALLY LOCATED ABUNDANT. AND TO THE NORTH, LAINE HILL LANE, WEST OF GRAY MAYNARD ROAD AND EAST OF THE TEXAS 132. MAYNARD, TEXAS. FROM A AGRICULTURE TO IRON TWO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL.
[00:10:05]
INDUSTRIAL. I DON'T HAVE ANY YELLOW CARDS. THIS REZONING IS FOR THE MAYNARD DOWNS PROPERTY JUST DOWN HILL LANE. IT IS A REZONING TO INDUSTRIAL HEAVY IRON TWO, AND IT'S CONCURRENT WITH FINISHING UP THEIR ANNEXATION PROCESS. SO ONCE THINGS ARE DONE, ONCE THEY'RE ANNEXED, THEY'LL ALREADY HAVE THEIR ZONING. SO THEY CAN START WITH THEIR ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT PROCESS FROM THEIR PRELIMINARY PLATS TO THEIR FINAL PLAT CONSTRUCTION PLAN. SITE PLAN.THIS IS JUST TO MAKE SURE THE PROCESS FLOWS SMOOTHLY. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE? AGENDA ITEM PUBLIC HEARING NUMBER THREE. OH, I MOVED TO CLOSE AGENDA. MY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TERRY. I HAVE A SECOND, SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER STETSON. ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED? MOVING ON. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS.
[CONSENT AGENDA]
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED TO BE SELF-EXPLANATORY BY THE PNC COMMISSION, AND WILL BE ENACTED WITH ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSIONS OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE CHAIR OR A COMMISSIONER, IN WHICH EVENT THE ITEMS WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.MOVING ON. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR CONSIDERING DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. MINUTES FOR THE JANUARY 8TH, 2025. PLANNING AND ZONING. REGULAR SESSION.
I MOVE APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER STETSON. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NEELY. ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND.
[REGULAR AGENDA]
OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES. MOVING ON. REGULAR AGENDA, ITEM NUMBER FIVE. CONSIDERING DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON REZONING. APPLICATION FOR ONE LOT ON .9596 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. AND BEING LOCATED AT ONE THREE 100 GREENBERRY DRIVE, MAYNARD, TEXAS FROM SF2 SINGLE FAMILY STANDARD TO C1 LIGHT COMMERCIAL. COMMISSIONERS, WE DO HAVE PAGE BACON HERE FOR DISCUSSION IF NEEDED FOR THIS AGENDA. MR. MICHAEL, TO REITERATE, THIS IS A PROPERTY THAT WAS ALREADY SUPPOSED TO BE REZONED. IT JUST SLIPPED THROUGH THE CRACKS. SO THAT PROCESS IS BEING HANDLED NOW. THE ADJACENT PARCEL, WHICH IS MAYNARD COMMONS NORTHEAST COMMERCIAL, IS ALREADY ZONED. SO THIS IS JUST TO CORRECT THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTIES. MR. BARROW, WILL THIS BE FOLDED INTO THAT LARGER TRACT DEVELOPMENT? IT'LL BE CONTIGUOUS. IT'LL BE TREATED AS A CONTIGUOUS PARCEL. YES. ONCE ZONED, THE INTENT WILL BE FOR THE ENTIRE THING TO BE ZONED FOR[00:15:01]
C1 LIGHT COMMERCIAL. AND IT WILL BE A COMMERCIAL TRACT. OKAY. THERE. WAS THERE A REASON TO BREAK THIS OUT FROM THE REST OF IT? IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE REZONED SOME TIME AGO. IT JUST DIDN'T. IT WAS A LAPSE OF ATTENTION AT THE SAME TIME. NO, SIR. AND THE SECTION ON THE EASTERN SIDE OF THIS OF GREENBERRY DRIVE, WILL THAT ALSO BE EVENTUALLY REZONED, OR IS IT GOING TO REMAIN? IT'S. IT'S SF TWO ADJACENT TO A POND. OH, THAT IS A POND. OKAY. THANK YOU.THAT'S RIGHT. IT'S A DETENTION. THANK YOU. I HAVE NO QUESTIONS. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER MYERS. DO I HAVE A SECOND? A SECOND, A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER STETSON. ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSE.
MOTION PASSES. MOVING ON TO REGULAR AGENDA. ITEM CONSIDERED. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON REZONING APPLICATION FOR ONE, LOT 51.30 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. AND BEING LOCATED AT 14,704 US HIGHWAY 290, MAYNARD, TEXAS FROM SF ONE SINGLE FAMILY, SUBURBAN AND A AGRICULTURE TO C3 HEAVY COMMERCIAL. MR. MICHAEL. YES. SO TO ANSWER SOME COMMUNITY MEMBER QUESTIONS AND POTENTIALLY ALLEVIATE SOME CONCERNS, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES TO TRAFFIC, ANY DEVELOPMENT THAT COMES WITHIN THE CITY. IN OUR CITY LIMITS, THERE'S SOMETHING CALLED A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THAT NEEDS TO BE CONDUCTED WITH YOUR DEVELOPMENT. IF YOU EXCEED A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TRIPS, THERE ARE CERTAIN MITIGATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS THAT NEED TO BE MADE TO WHATEVER ROADWAY YOU ARE IMPACTING TO ENSURE THAT YOU'RE NOT CAUSING UNWARRANTED TRAFFIC BURDENS. NOW, AS FOR WHAT CAN GO ON THIS TRACT, I COULDN'T TELL YOU. ZONING DOES NOT MAKE YOU SPECIFY WHAT YOUR INTENT IS WHEN ZONED. IT JUST GIVES YOU ESSENTIALLY A LAUNDRY LIST OF THINGS THAT YOU CAN DO ONCE ZONED. I CAN'T TELL YOU. THE INTENT CURRENTLY IS TO HAVE EIGHT LOTS, I BELIEVE EIGHT LOTS. YEAH, IT'S NINE LOTS TOTAL. EIGHT LOTS COMMERCIAL ON THE SOUTHWESTERN CORNER, WHICH IS NOT IN THE FLOODPLAIN. AND THEN THE FLOODPLAIN IS INTENDED FOR SOME USE THAT IS ALLOWED TO BE IN THE FLOODPLAIN. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THEY WANT TO. WELL, I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE DEVELOPERS THOUGH, RV PARK ON THE BACK END, BECAUSE THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IS POSSIBLE IN A FLOODPLAIN ZONE. BUT AS FOR WHAT THE USES ARE OUTSIDE OF THAT, I CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT NOW. WITH C-3 ZONING, IT IS OUR MOST PERMISSIVE ZONING CATEGORY, WHICH I HAVE DETAILED IN THE BACKUP SUMMARY FORM, AND THAT ALLOWS FOR A LOT OF THINGS BY RIGHT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO GAS STATIONS, STORAGE UNITS, CERTAIN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES. AND THAT IS SOMETHING TO HEAVILY CONSIDER WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS PROPERTY, ESPECIALLY IN COMPARISON TO OUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP, AND THE IDEA OF THIS BEING A COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR. IS THE APPLICANT HERE OR AN AGENT FOR THE APPLICANT? CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY YOU. THANK YOU FOR COMING AND I'LL ASK YOU TO INTRODUCE YOURSELF. CAN YOU HELP US UNDERSTAND WHAT THE LETTER OF INTENT OUTLINES? WANTING TO PURSUE RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK RV PARK IS AS PART OF THE COMMERCIAL ITEMS ON HERE, WHICH IS ALLOWED IN C2 MEDIUM COMMERCIAL. CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY YOU CHOSE TO REQUEST C3 INSTEAD OF C2? YEAH, MY NAME IS JOSE LOZANO. I'M WITH LJ ENGINEERING. IN SUPPORT OF THIS REZONE AND WE AT THIS POINT HAVE NO DEFINED USES FOR WHAT IS INTENDED TO BE THERE. AND FOR THE PURPOSE THAT HE BROUGHT UP, IT WOULD LEFT THE BIGGEST WINDOW TO WHAT COULD BE PUT THERE. WE INTEND TO KEEP AN OPEN SPACE THROUGH THE FLOODPLAIN, AND AS EVERY OTHER DEVELOPMENT, WE WOULD HAVE TO PROVIDE THE ADEQUATE IMPROVEMENTS AND CONVEY DRAINAGE TO NOT HAVE ANY IMPACTS TO ANY ADJACENT PROPERTIES. AND THAT, AS IS AT A LATER PHASE. SO AT THIS POINT, WE ARE JUST SECURING THE ZONING TO ALLOW FOR THE FUTURE. PROCESS FOR THIS NOW. THE RV PARK IS THE ONLY THING WE AT THIS TIME THAT IS KNOWN. THAT IS THE INTENTION. AND THAT WOULD BE GOING IN MOST A MAJORITY OF
[00:20:02]
FLOODPLAIN THAT ANY OF THAT IMPROVEMENTS WOULD HAVE TO BE DESIGNED IN WAYS TO NOT IMPACT ANY ADJACENT OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES. AND YEAH. IS IT MY UNDERSTANDING THAT BASICALLY THE FLOODPLAIN IS ALL OF LOT NINE? THAT IS CORRECT. AND DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING SPECIFICALLY IN MIND FOR LOTS ONE THROUGH EIGHT? NO. AT THIS TIME THERE'S NO KNOWN. USE FOR THESE SITES. AND I DO WANT TO REITERATE THAT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER IS ALREADY IN YOUR CORRIDOR, YOUR INDUSTRIAL, YOUR COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR FOR YOUR FUTURE LAND USE. WOULD THAT BE A PROBLEM IF IT WAS C2 INSTEAD OF C3 FOR, WELL, FOR ANY OF IT. WE I'D HAVE TO GET BACK TO YOU ON CHANGING THE REQUEST, BUT. WE WOULD PREFER TO KEEP A C3 ZONING. BUT I COULD NOT ANSWER THAT AT THIS TIME. OKAY.THE REASON I'M ASKING IS BECAUSE, GENERALLY SPEAKING, MOST USES THAT ARE IN C3 ARE ALSO IN C2. THEY'RE JUST A HANDFUL OF THINGS THAT WOULD NOT BE SO. THAT'S REASON I'M ASKING IF THERE'S SOMETHING SPECIFIC THAT TO C3 THAT YOU CAN'T DO IN C2. IT WOULD BE NICE TO KNOW.
YEAH. I THINK IF WE'D. DISCUSS THIS WITH THE DEVELOPER AND IF IT WOULD BE A MORE PALATABLE THING, THEN WE MIGHT CONSIDER WHAT IF THAT WOULD BE A BETTER ROUTE? BUT AT THIS TIME, WE.
WOULD LIKE TO KEEP PURSUING MORE SPECIFICALLY, THE REASON I'M ASKING IS THIS THE ONLY PORTION OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS ADJACENT TO AN EXISTING SUBDIVISION, RESIDENTIAL AREAS. SO THAT'S MY SPECIFIC REASON FOR ASKING THAT. YEAH. AND ANY END USES WOULD THAT ON THESE DEVELOPMENTS WOULD BE FOLLOWING YOUR EXISTING ORDINANCES, YOU KNOW, BUFFERS, WHATEVER KIND OF REQUIREMENTS ARE MEANT TO BE OR EXPECTED TO BE, THERE WOULD ARE FULLY INTENDED TO BE PUT TO FOLLOW YOUR CURRENT ORDINANCES. MR. BURRELL, CAN YOU THE TRACK JUST WEST OF THIS, I THINK IT'S TWO LOTS WEST OF THIS WHICH IS IN THE TURNER'S IS WE JUST HAD THIS RECENTLY IS THAT I KNOW IT'S PART OF THE PUD, BUT IS IT ESSENTIALLY FOLLOWING C2 OR C1? THAT WOULD BE THE PHASE SIX OF MAYNARD HEIGHTS. I BELIEVE THE IT'D BE C2 FOR THAT PORTION OF MAYNARD HEIGHTS. OKAY. THE REPLAT THAT WE JUST HAD. YEAH. THANK YOU. SO MY QUESTION WOULD BE ALSO LIKE. MY, MY COMMUNITY MEMBERS HERE, ONE THING THAT WE'RE EXPERIENCING IS, IS THE TRAFFIC AND THE FLOW OF THE TRAFFIC. ARE YOU GUYS GOING TO LOOK TO WORK ON HELPING ALLEVIATE THAT TRAFFIC? BECAUSE PARDON ME, IF I MAY, THIS IS STILL A ZONING CASE. WE CANNOT ASK QUESTIONS ABOUT POTENTIAL SITE DEVELOPMENT, AS THERE'S NO SPECIFIC USES DETAILED IN THIS. SO ANY QUESTIONS HAVE TO PERTAIN TO THE ZONING OR THE USE. IT CANNOT PERTAIN TO TRAFFIC OR GRADING OR ANYTHING SITE RELATED OR DEVELOPMENT RELATED, IF YOU WILL. SO OKAY. AND TO FOLLOW ON HIM, ANYTHING TO PROPOSE TO BE DEVELOPED WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW YOUR EXISTING REQUIREMENTS. AND IN THAT PROVING OUT WHAT IMPACTS THAT WOULD HAVE TO THE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR ME?
[00:25:15]
COMMISSIONERS WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO. YEAH. ONE. COMMISSIONER TOMBS. NOT NECESSARILY A QUESTION, BUT MORE OF A COMMENT. LOOKING AT THE PERMISSIVE USES, WE'VE GONE DOWN THIS ROAD BEFORE ON APPLICANTS REQUIRING OR ASKING FOR C3. AND THERE'S A THERE'S A LARGE LAUNDRY LIST OF PERMISSIVE USES. AND CONSIDERING, YOU KNOW, ITS PROXIMITY TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES, NAMELY SINGLE FAMILY NEXT TO IT, DEFINITELY. YOU KNOW, THERE ARE SOME USES I AM NOT INCLINED TO APPROVE ON THIS, YOU KNOW, WITH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN C3 AND C2. YOU HAVE, YOU KNOW, ADULT ORIENTED BUSINESSES. AND THAT WOULD BE IN THE BACK, YOU KNOW, BACK DOOR OF SOMEONE'S HOUSE. SO LOOKING AT, YOU KNOW, EXACTLY WHAT YOUR DEVELOPER ON, WHAT'S CONTEMPLATED TO BE IN THESE AREAS IS ESSENTIAL TO ASKING, YOU KNOW, FOR C3 AND NOT EXACTLY KNOWING WHAT IS WHAT IS THERE OR WHAT YOU ARE CONTEMPLATING RIGHT NOW AND ASKING US TO APPROVE, YOU KNOW, BLANKETED FOR THAT. AND SOMEWHERE DOWN THE ROAD WE CAN TALK ABOUT DOING SOMETHING ELSE.SO THAT'S JUST A COMMENT HERE FOR THE DIOCESE TO CONTEMPLATE. AS WE ARE LOOKING AT, YOU KNOW, THIS PARTICULAR AGENDA ITEM, THERE ARE SOME OTHER ITEMS OF PERMISSIVE USES, YOU KNOW, FOR C3 VERSUS C2 OR ANY OTHER, YOU KNOW, ZONING DISTRICT THAT I THINK YOU NEED TO LOOK AT BEFORE MAKING A DECISION WHETHER TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE OR APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS. OR EVEN POSTPONE UNTIL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. I THINK YOU HAVE ALL THAT TO YOUR DISPOSAL TO DECIDE, AS WE'RE LOOKING AT THAT IN REGARDS TO SOME OF THE COMMENTS EARLIER, THAT'S I THINK. SOME MORE ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS DEFINITELY WOULD NEED TO BE TAKEN PLACE. YOU KNOW, AND FOR THIS FLOODPLAIN, IT'S GOING WHAT IT IS NORTH AND SOUTH OF THAT ENTIRE PROPERTY.
WE'VE DEALT WITH THIS IN REGARDS TO AN APARTMENT COMPLEX. PREVIOUSLY, WHERE THERE IS DEFINITELY MAJOR CONCERNS OF THE, YOU KNOW, THE IMPROVEMENTS OR WHAT IT'S LIKE THE SITE PLACEMENT, IN ADDITION TO, YOU KNOW, WHAT WAS CONTEMPLATED TO BE ON THAT PROPERTY AND BEING MAJOR ROADS, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE'RE DEALING WITH EITHER STATE OR COUNTY ROADS VERSUS CITY ROADS, AND THAT'S, YOU KNOW, FOR THE EDIFICATION OF EVERYONE HERE, WE HAVE NO JURISDICTION OVER THE STATE AND COUNTY ROADS, BUT WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WHEN IN OUR APPROVAL PROCESS AND COORDINATION, THAT THOSE THINGS HAPPEN, YOU KNOW, WITH THE EITHER THE STATE OR THE COUNTY, YOU KNOW, POX, SO THAT WHEN WE GET TO IT, LIKE THOSE DECISIONS AND THE PLANS THAT WE CAN ACTUALLY SEE AND AGREE TO IT, AND THAT WAY IT CAN ABIDE BY OUR CITY PLANS MOVING FORWARD AND COMPREHENSIVE PLANS THAT IT ALL WORKS OUT TOGETHER. RIGHT? SO EVEN IF, YOU KNOW, YOU GO THROUGH THE TIA AND, YOU KNOW, AT STATE CERTAIN THINGS BECAUSE IT'S A STATE ROAD, YOU KNOW, WE NEED TO LOOK AT THOSE THINGS IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT IT COMPLIES WITH WHAT OUR REQUIREMENTS AND THOUGHTS ARE TO ON THAT. SO THAT'S MY COMMENTS. IF YOU SAW A QUESTION IN ALL OF THAT, YOU CAN ANSWER IT TO IT, BUT I'LL LEAVE IT TO THAT. STAFF. I HAVE ONE QUESTION RELATED TO YOUR STAFF RECOMMENDATION, WHICH, BY THE WAY, WAS POSTED FRIDAY AND CALLS FOR C2 AS THE RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDED ZONING. SO I WANT THAT TO BE AT LEAST ON THE
[00:30:02]
RECORD THAT THAT'S BEEN POSTED SINCE FRIDAY. AS THE RECOMMENDATION FOR THIS FROM STAFF FOR THIS PARCEL. SO COMING FORWARD WITH KNOWLEDGE OF THAT, IF C2 WAS TO BE RECOMMENDED FOR THIS PROPERTY, WOULD GASOLINE STATION LIMITED AND GASOLINE STATION FULL SERVICE? SINCE THEIR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUIREMENT, THEY'D STILL HAVE TO COME BACK FOR AN APPROVAL TO HAVE THOSE SPECIFIC USES IF THEY WERE INCLUDED IN THE RECOMMENDATION. YES, SINCE IN THE USE GUIDE THERE IS AN S OR A C LISTED NEXT TO IT. SPECIFIC USE PERMIT DOES REQUIRE THIS TO COME BACK BEFORE P AND Z AND THE COUNCIL, IN ORDER TO BE APPROVED FOR CONDITIONAL USES, DO NOT REQUIRE THAT ADDITIONAL LAYER OF APPROVAL BECAUSE THEY ARE PERMITTED BY AS LONG AS THEY MEET THE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN, AND IF THEY MEET THE CONDITIONS SET WITHIN OUR ZONING ORDINANCE, THEN THEY ARE ALLOWED TO PROCEED WITH DESIGNED WITH AN S THAT IS SPECIFIC USE, WHICH DOES REQUIRE AN APPEARANCE BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS WELL AS THE COUNCIL. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SIR. COMMISSIONERS, WE HAVE ANY MORE OTHER QUESTIONS? I'VE BEEN.DO YOU WANT TO DO IT? YOU GOT IT. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE. AGENDA ITEM SIX UNDER A. C2 ZONING. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MEYER. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND? I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER STETSON. ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSE. MOTION PASSES 5 TO 1. WITHOUT ASKING QUESTIONS AND FOLLOW UP. UNFORTUNATELY, AT THIS TIME. NO, SIR. BUT IF YOU WANT TO WAIT TILL THE END OF THE MEETING, MY GENTLEMAN AT THE END WILL SURELY LOVE TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS. MOVING ON TO AGENDA ITEM 11. CONSIDER DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON REZONING APPLICATION FOR SEVEN. ITEM NUMBER SEVEN. OKAY. SEVEN OH, I'M SORRY, I'M LOOKING AT THE WRONG THING. AGENDA ITEM SEVEN CONSIDERING DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON REZONING APPLICATION FOR SEVEN LOTS ON 146.92 ACRES MORE OR LESS. AND BEING GENERALLY LOCATED ABUNDANT ON TO THE NORTH OF HILL LANE, WEST OF GREG MAYNARD ROAD AND EAST OF TEXAS. 130 TOM MAYNARD, TEXAS FROM AGRICULTURE TO IN. DASH TWO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. INDUSTRIAL. STAFF. SO TO REITERATE, THIS IS THE OLD MAYNARD DOWNS PROPERTY. IT IS CURRENTLY BEING ANNEXED INTO OUR CITY LIMITS AND WHILE IT IS NOT CONTEMPLATED IN OUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP BECAUSE IT WASN'T IN OUR CITY LIMITS, IT IS IN AN AREA THAT IS SATURATED WITH INDUSTRIAL USES. CURRENTLY, TO THE SOUTH OF HILL LANE, WE HAVE A FEW INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS WITHIN. THE OTHER TRACKS AROUND IT ARE CONTEMPLATED FOR THAT AS WELL, SO IT DOES FALL IN LINE WITH THE THEME FOR THE AREA. SO I HAVE A QUESTION AND JUST SHOWING HOW LONG I'VE BEEN HERE. SO AS IT BEING MAYNARD DOWNS, WASN'T THAT ALREADY LIKE A PUBLIC LIKE I WOULDN'T REALIZE THAT WOULD BE AGRICULTURE. I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND IT WAS A HORSE RACING TRACK, BUT WOULDN'T THAT ALREADY BE SOME KIND OF COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRY SOMETHING ALREADY? SO THE HISTORY THAT WAS PAINTED OUT TO ME IS THAT WHILE THIS WAS INITIALLY IN THE CITY LIMITS, IT WAS THEN TRANSFERRED TO, WELL, VERONICA LOOKS LIKE SHE HAS SOMETHING TO SAY. SHE CAN PAINT IT, BUT I CAN. THE COMMISSIONERS EXCUSE ME.
VERONICA RIVERA, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY, WITH REGARD TO YOUR QUESTION, THIS PROPERTY ACTUALLY IS NOT HAS NOT BEEN ANNEXED BY THE CITY OF MAYNARD. THERE MAY HAVE BEEN SOME TRANSACTIONS IN THE PAST WHERE IT WAS REMOVED FROM THE CITY LIMITS, OR POSSIBLY EVEN THOUGH IT SAID MAYNARD DOWNS, IT WAS NEVER IN THE CITY LIMITS, SO IT WAS ACTUALLY IN AUSTIN'S ETJ. THE CITY OF AUSTIN'S ETJ, AND THROUGH STATE STATUTE, THE OWNERS OF THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY HAVE REQUESTED IT TO BE DIS ANNEXED. AND SO AND NOW THEY'RE GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS OF ANNEXATION. WE I BELIEVE YOU ALL HAVE SEEN THIS BEFORE. WHEN WE GO THROUGH ANNEXATION, YOU DO COME TO P AND Z, BUT BEFORE WE CAN ZONE, WE ANNEX THE PROPERTY AT THE SAME TIME. THAT'S THE FIRST ITEM. AND THEN WE DO THE ZONING, BUT WE DO GO THROUGH P AND Z FIRST. SO THANK YOU MA'AM.
I DID KNOW THAT IT WASN'T IN THE CITY OF MAYNARD. I'VE KNOWN THAT FOREVER. BUT YEAH, I JUST KNEW
[00:35:05]
THAT IT WAS ALWAYS CALLED MAYNARD DOWNS. BUT YEAH. THAT'S FUNNY. STAFF IS THIS IS IN TWO IN LINE WITH THE COUNCIL'S VISION FOR THIS. THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT THIS LAST WEEK AT THEIR COUNCIL MEETING ABOUT INCORPORATING THIS AND POSSIBLY FINDING SOME SORT OF POSSIBLE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT FOR THIS. OR IS THAT NOT SO? THE COUNCIL IS AWARE OF THE INTENDED USE FOR THE PROPERTY, AS WELL AS THE PRELIMINARY LAYOUT OF WHAT'S INTENDED TO BE THERE. THERE'S ALSO DISCUSSION OF DEDICATION OR CONVEYANCE OF A LOT FOR PARKLAND, WHICH WOULD BE A POTENTIAL AMENITY FOR THE COMMUNITY. I DON'T WANT TO SAY WHAT AMENITY BECAUSE I WOULD HATE TO SET EXPECTATIONS, BUT I AND I AND TO CONFIRM, AS YOU NOTED IN THE BACKUP IN TWO DOES CONFORM TO THAT VISION. YES. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THAT WAS KIND OF MY QUESTION TO COMMISSIONERS.DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? OTHER QUESTIONS. I MOVED TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN. I HAVE A MOTION BY VICE CHAIR CHAVIS TO APPROVE. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TERRY. ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES. MOVING ON TO REGULAR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER EIGHT. CONSIDER DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON DRAINAGE WAIVER REQUESTS FOR BOYS STREET. MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 101, 104, 107 AND 108 BOYS STREET, MAYNARD, TEXAS. SO THIS ONE'S A FUN ONE BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH THE REQUEST FOLLOWS THE AUSTIN DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL, THIS IS A DETENTION WAIVER REQUEST, NOT A DRAINAGE WAIVER REQUEST. AND DUE TO THE INCORRECT AGENDA POSTING, THIS WILL NEED TO BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING. ALL RIGHT COMMISSIONERS. OH. APOLOGIES.
VERONICA RIVERA, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY. THE ITEM IS ACTUALLY PULLED. REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.
OKAY. THANK YOU. MY APOLOGIES. ALL RIGHT, MOVING ON. REGULAR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER NINE.
CONSIDER DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON SUBDIVISION. SHORT FORM, FINAL PLAT FOR FM 1100 MAYNARD 12 BEING ONE LOT ON 12.62 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF US HIGHWAY 290 AND FM 1100. MAYNARD, TEXAS. STAFF. THIS IS A PLAT THAT'S OFF OF VOLKER LANE, AND FM 1100 IS JUST TURNING IT INTO ONE LOT AS OPPOSED TO THE PRIOR CONFIGURATION. IT'S BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY ENGINEERS. SO YEAH. THIS IS A NON-DISCRETIONARY ITEM. I MOVE APPROVAL OF ITEM NINE. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER STETSON.
DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND? I HAVE A SECOND BY VICE CHAIR CHAVIS. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED.
MOTION PASSES. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING AT 711. MOVE TO ADJOURN. I HAVE A MOTION BY VICE CHAIR CHAVIS. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND, SECOND BY STETSON? ALL IN
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.