[CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM IS PRESENT]
[00:00:12]
THE PLANNING AND ZONING. REGULAR MEETING FOR DECEMBER THE 10TH, 2025 AT 642. PUBLIC
[PUBLIC COMMENTS]
COMMENTS. NON AGENDA ITEM. PUBLIC COMMENTS, WHITE CARDS. COMMENTS WILL BE TAKEN FROM THE AUDIENCE ON NON AGENDA RELATED TOPICS FOR A LENGTH OF TIME, NOT TO EXCEED THREE MINUTES PER PERSON. AGENDA ITEM. PUBLIC COMMENTS. YELLOW CARDS. COMMENTS WILL BE TAKEN FROM THE AUDIENCE ON NON AGENDA ITEMS COMBINED FOR THE LENGTH OF TIME NOT TO EXCEED FIVE MINUTE TOTAL PER PERSON ON ALL ITEMS EXCEPT FOR PUBLIC HEARING. COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING MUST BE MADE WHEN THE ITEMS COME BEFORE BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE AND NOT TO EXCEED TWO MINUTES PER PERSON. NO ACTION OR DISCUSSION MAY BE TAKEN BY THE BOARD. COMMISSION COMMITTEE DURING PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON AGENDA ITEMS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE, PLEASE COMPLETE THE WHITE OR YELLOW CARD AND PRESENT IT TO THE CITY STAFF. DESIGN DESIGNATED PERIOD. PRIOR TO THE MEETING. COMMISSIONERS, WE DID RECEIVE AN EMAIL AND JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU'RE AWARE OF THAT. FIRST. WE DO HAVE ONE MR. ROBERT BATTLE. THANK YOU SIR.NICE TO BE HERE. PLEASURE TO SEE YOU GUYS. YOU KNOW, IN THE REAL WORLD, YOU WOULD READ THE COMMENT. THAT'S A PUBLIC COMMENT FROM A PERSON THAT COULDN'T BE HERE. NOW, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE AWARE I'M THE HONORARY MAYOR OF OLD MANOR. I HAVE A FACEBOOK GROUP CALLED MANOR COMMUNITY COALITION. THIS MEETING IS REALLY HAS SEVERAL ILLEGAL ASPECTS TO IT. AND I FILED A MUNICIPAL COURT COMPLAINT NAMING ALL YOU GUYS AS BEING CLASS C MISDEMEANORS.
NOW, DON'T GET TOO WORKED UP. THE MOST YOU CAN BE FINED IS 500 BUCKS AND IT'S A COURT OF NO RECORD, SO NOBODY'S GOING TO KNOW WHAT YOU SAY. YOU CAN SAY ANYTHING YOU WANT TO. I ASK THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY'S BE RECUSED BECAUSE THE IDEA OF THE CITY ATTORNEY'S BEING THE PROSECUTOR IN THE MANOR COURT OF NO RECORD IS COMPLETELY ABSURD. THEY'LL NEVER BRING A CASE AGAINST THE MAYOR OR THE CITY MANAGER OR ANY STAFF MEMBERS. OKAY, BUT. THIS ONE HERE, WHY ARE THERE SO MANY THINGS CRAMMED ON HERE? DOES ANYBODY REALLY NOT KNOW? IT'S BECAUSE THEY'RE TRYING TO CRAM THIS DOWN OUR THROAT. MR. DUNLOP'S OVER HERE. HE'S RUNNING THE CITY STILL. WHY IS HE SITTING UP AT THE DAIS? HE'S NOT ON YOUR COMMISSION. HE NEEDS TO SIT OUT HERE WITH THE DIRECTORS. AND THAT GOES FOR MR. SCOTT BURRELL OR MR. MIKE DUNLOP. EITHER ONE OF THEM NEEDS TO SIT OUT HERE WITH THE STAFF. THAT'S BASICALLY CREATING A FALSE SENSE OF POWER. HE'S THE CENSOR. YOU GUYS CAN'T EVEN GET YOUR OWN EMAIL ADDRESSES. YOU GUYS NEED TO BECOME A COMMISSION. THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO TEACH YOU.
ACTUALLY, I THINK THERE'S SOME TALENT UP ON YOUR PLACE. THAT SHOULD BE MAYBE IN THE CITY COUNCIL. CECIL DOESN'T WANT TO, THOUGH. JUST KIDDING. SO NOW HERE, FOR EXAMPLE, COMING UP IS THIS 104 TOWNS. THAT'S A HISTORIC MANSION THEY TORE DOWN. THEY WANT TO GET TWO MORE FEET IN THE ALLEY, YOU SAY? NO, WE WANT TO SEE YOUR PLAN. I'M. I HAVE A LAWSUIT NOW. THERE'S 20 DEFENDANTS AND 80 ATTORNEYS AGAINST ME. IT'S A FAIR FIGHT. THAT BUILDING NEEDS TO BE RESTORED OR. EXCUSE ME. IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN RESTORED OR MOVED OVER BY THE HOMESTEAD.
INSTEAD, IT GOT TORN DOWN TO PUT IN SOME REALLY EXCITING TOWNHOMES. THE TOWNHOMES NEED TO MIMIC THE BUILDING THEY TOOK DOWN. IT'S JUST A SKIN. AND IF IT COSTS, IF THEY WANT TO TRY TO PRETEND IT COSTS 30,000, WE'LL PAY IT BECAUSE WE NEED TO PROTECT OUR LANDMARKS, NOT TEAR THEM DOWN. YOU GUYS ARE PART OF THAT PROBLEM BECAUSE YOU ACTUALLY APPROVE THE
[00:05:03]
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT'S BEEN USED TO TO BULLDOZE ALL THESE PLACES. THIS IS A HISTORIC DISTRICT. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU VOTED FOR IT BACK IN 2017. IT'S BEEN A HISTORIC DISTRICT IN OUR CODES. I UNDERSTAND THE CITY COUNCIL DOESN'T KNOW WHAT THE PHRASE HISTORIC DISTRICT IS.THEY THINK HISTORY IS PUTTING THE WORD MANOR DOWNS ON THE SIDE OF A WAREHOUSE. THEY THINK THAT'S SAVING OUR HISTORY. LET'S SEE WHAT ELSE WE GOT. OKAY. NUMBER 11, THIS DEVELOPER, MUSTANG VALLEY, THEY'RE SO CHEAP, THEY WON'T EVEN BUILD A WATER RETENTION WALL. SO THEY LET THEIR PROPERTY FLOOD THE NEIGHBORS. WHICH BRINGS TO MIND ANOTHER THING. WHY AM I PAYING $6 A MONTH FOR WATER STORMWATER RUNOFF? I HAVEN'T ADDED ANY CONCRETE. YOU HADN'T FIXED A SIDEWALK IN HERE IN, LIKE, 80 YEARS. SO WHY IS THE WHOLE CITY PAYING THAT? I'LL TELL YOU WHY.
IT'S A GIVEAWAY TO DEVELOPERS, THE DEVELOPERS AND THE CONSULTANTS AND THE BOND SELLERS HAVE TAKEN OVER OUR CITY, AND YOU GUYS ARE THE ONES THAT SHOULD BE STANDING UP.
YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE A COMMISSION, AN INDEPENDENT BODY. YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE UNDER THE CITY COUNCIL, BUT YOU GUYS JUST DON'T SEEM TO WANT TO READ THE CITY CODES. YOU CAN HAVE YOUR OWN SECRETARY, YOU CAN SET YOUR OWN AGENDAS, AND YOU WOULDN'T BE SITTING HERE CRAMMING ALL THIS STUFF DOWN HERE. NUMBER EIGHT AND NINE ON OR EXCUSE ME, SEVEN, SIX AND SEVEN MAYNARD DOWNS. THOSE SHOULD BE TWO SEPARATE WHOLE REALMS WITH MAYBE SIX WEEKS IN BETWEEN. ARE YOU GETTING READY TO THANK YOU FOR WAITING. APPRECIATE THAT. SO THANK YOU
[PUBLIC HEARING]
VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, MR. ROBERT. MOVING ON, PUBLIC HEARING, CONDUCT A PUBLIC CONDUCT. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON A SUBDIVISION CONCEPT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR MAYNARD DOWNS INDUSTRIAL BEING SEVEN LOTS ON 146.92 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, AND BEING TCAD PARCEL 2479 7224 7974 2479. 8724798624798424797347738924791, AND BEING LOCATED AT 8916 HILL LANE, MAYNARD, TEXAS. MR. ROBERT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS IS A COMPANY THAT REALLY PLAYED OUR TOWN FOR CHUMPS. THIS USED TO BE ANNEXED AS PART OF AUSTIN, AND AUSTIN WAS GOING TO MAKE THEM SPEND PROBABLY 3 OR $4 MILLION ON WATER MITIGATION, ENVIRONMENTAL THINGS. AND SO THEY GOT THIS BRILLIANT IDEA. HEY, WELL, LET'S DO AN SB 2038 AND WE'LL JUST WE'LL JUST DE ANNEX FROM THEM, AND THEN WE'LL GET THESE PEOPLE IN MAYNARD TO GIVE US 8.5 MILLION. DO YOU HEAR WHAT I SAID? THEY WENT FROM HAVING TO PAY 2.5 MILLION OR 3 TO JUST GETTING A FREE RIDE. WE GAVE THEM A CHAPTER 380 AGREEMENT, THIS GIVING THEM HALF OF THE PROPERTY TAXES BACK FOR LIKE 25 YEARS. SO WE'RE PAYING THEM TO COME DESTROY OUR LANDMARKS.MAYNARD DOWNS THE COOLEST THING THIS CITY EVER DID. IT'S A GIGANTIC STADIUM. FARM AID WAS THERE, LOTS OF GREAT CONCERTS, AND THEY WANT TO GIVE US A LITTLE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK, A LITTLE BANDSHELL ON FLATLAND. THEY THEY ACTUALLY CALLED IT AN AMPHITHEATER. AN AMPHITHEATER.
THAT'S THE KIND OF BOZOS THAT WE HAVE WORKING ON THE CITY COUNCIL. NOW, YOU GUYS GOT PLAYED FOR CHUMPS WHEN YOU REZONED IT FROM FOUR PARCELS TO SEVEN. YOU KNOW WHY THEY DID THAT? HAVE YOU FIGURED IT OUT YET? IT WAS SO THEY COULD SPIN OFF EVERYTHING BELOW HILL LANE FOR SUBDIVISION. AND I REMEMBER YOU, MR. PIUS. YOU ASKED HIM. OH, AT LEAST YOU'RE GOING TO FIX UP HILL LANE. SOMETHING TO THAT EFFECT. HE LIED OUT HIS REAR END AND TOLD YOU THEY NEVER PLANNED TO FIX HILL LANE, EVER. THEY SPUN ALL THAT ONTO THIS NEW SUBDIVISION THEY KIND OF ACCIDENTALLY TALKED ABOUT. AND THEN THEY ALSO TRIED TO TELL US NOW THAT THE WATER PROBLEM, THEY THINK THAT THIS 150 YEAR OLD, 29 INCH HERITAGE PECAN TREE IS GOING TO HAVE A PROBLEM. THE ONLY PROBLEM THE ONLY INVASIVE SPECIES IS DELFIN DELFIN INDUSTRIES. BOWMAN.
SHE'S HERE TONIGHT, SHE ADMITTED. SHE SAID THE WATER PROBLEM IS FROM UPSTREAM. IF THE WATER PROBLEMS FROM UPSTREAM, YOU GET THE UPSTREAM TO FIX IT. DON'T PUT US ON IT AND DON'T. IF YOU GUYS READ YOUR OWN LANDMARK GREENBELT TYPE THINGS FOR TREES, THE PARKING IS SUPPOSED TO GO AROUND THE TREES. TIMES UP IS UP. THANK YOU. CITY STAFF. SURE.
SO THIS IS BEING DONE. YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS THAT ARE ALSO ON THE PRESENTATION
[00:10:06]
SHOWING THE CHANGE SPECIFIC TO THE LOT. SO IT IS THE PROPOSED PARKLAND LOT. SO THERE WAS ORIGINALLY THERE'S ALWAYS BEEN A LIFT STATION ON THE PROPERTY ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF IT.AND THROUGH SORT OF DISCUSSIONS AND WORKING THROUGH THIS, WE WANTED, YOU KNOW, THE LIFT STATION NOT TO BE ON THE CITY LOT. SO THERE WASN'T THIS, YOU KNOW, ANY ISSUES WITH IT BEING OWNED BY THE CITY BUT MAINTAINED BY THE DEVELOPMENT AS IT IS A PRIVATE LIFT STATION.
AND SO THIS AMENDMENT TO THE CONCEPT PLAN AND LATER PRELIMINARY PLAT ARE JUST SORT OF NOTCHING OUT THE CORNER OF THAT POTENTIAL PARKLAND LOT OR FUTURE CITY LOT. AGAIN, THE THE LIFT STATION HAS ALWAYS BEEN THERE. SO THAT LAND WASN'T NECESSARILY DEVELOPABLE FOR THE CITY BECAUSE THE LIFT STATION WAS THERE. IT ALWAYS WAS PROPOSED TO BE THERE, BUT THIS JUST TAKES IT AND PUTS IT ONTO THE DEVELOPER'S PROPERTY VERSUS BEING ON THE CITY'S PROPERTY.
AND IF YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM. AND AGAIN, THE DEVELOPERS HERE TOO, IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THEM. AND ALSO WHEN YOU GET TO THE ACTION ITEM, THERE IS A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ON THIS PROPERTY THAT HAS THE PRIOR EXHIBIT IN IT THAT DOESN'T SHOW THE LITTLE NOTCH OUT IN THE CORNER. AND SO THAT WILL HAVE TO BE AMENDED AND JUST UPDATED THE AGREEMENT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. AND SO THIS THIS CONCEPT PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY OUR ENGINEER. SO IT IS ABLE TO BE APPROVED BY YOU ALL TONIGHT. BUT WE JUST ASKING FOR THAT CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PENDING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BEING AMENDED. ANY QUESTIONS COMMISSIONERS.
NO QUESTIONS. ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING I MOVE WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM ONE. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER. SECOND, DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NILA. ALL IN FAVOR OPPOSED CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR MAYNARD DOWNS. INDUSTRIAL BEING SEVEN LOTS ON 146.92 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING TCAT PURCELL 2479 7224 7974 2479.
8724798624798427247973477389247, AND BEING LOCATED AT 8916 HILL LANE, MAYNARD, TEXAS. MR. ROBERT BATTLE. THANK YOU SIR. MY NAME IS ROBERT BATTLE. LET'S TALK A LITTLE ABOUT THE PROBLEMS WITH THESE ONGOING MEETINGS. ANY PRESENTATION MATERIALS NEED TO BE BROUGHT FORTH AT EVERY SINGLE MEETING YOU HAVE. YOU DON'T GET TO DO A PRESENTATION ON MEETING ONE AND NOT DO IT ON MEETING TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? THAT'S A BREAKING OF THE LAW.
NOW, WHEN YOU GUYS ALSO DID THIS. YOU FAILED TO PERFORM. YOU FAILED TO PERFORM MANDATORY DUTIES. PENAL CODE 39.04. YOU DID AN ABUSE OF OFFICIAL CAPACITY UNDER $100. THAT'S PENAL CODE 39.02. THE HERITAGE TREE IS PROTECTED BY MULTIPLE MANDATORY ORDINANCE, INCLUDING A TOPOGRAPHIC AND TREE SURVEY CONSTRAINTS. EXHIBITS. BASICALLY WHAT THEY DID IS BEFORE WE EVER ANNEXED IT, THEY WERE REQUIRED TO HAVE A COMPLETED PLAN. THEY NEVER HAD A COMPLETED PLAN. THEY STILL DON'T HAVE A COMPLETED PLAN. HAVE YOU SEEN A LANDSCAPE PLAN? DO YOU REALLY THINK A GIGANTIC TREE IS EQUAL TO A TWO INCH TREE PLANTED AROUND A WAREHOUSE BOX? HEY, LET'S GO LOOK AT THOSE TREES BY THE WAREHOUSE. NO. AND RESPECTFULLY, SIR, WE HAVE A COMMERCIAL PARK OUT HERE. MAYNARD COMMERCIAL PARK IS ALMOST HALFWAY TO ELGIN. THAT'S FOR THOSE BIG UGLY BOXES. THAT'S WHERE THEY GO. AND YOU NEED TO GO THERE. WE CAN TRADE YOU SOME LAND. WE HAVE ANOTHER DEVELOPMENT. EAST DEVELOPMENT ONE. I KNOW A CREATIVE NAME.
RIGHT? HOW ABOUT WE DO A LAND SWAP WITH YOU FOR LIKE, 80 ACRES OVER THERE? THOSE BOXES
[00:15:03]
ARE GOING TO BE RUN BY ROBOTS. DOES ANYONE IN THIS ROOM REALLY NOT THINK THAT YOU HAVE THIS NONSENSE? OH, YOU'RE GOING TO CREATE A LOT OF JOBS. BALONEY. TREES IN THE FLOODPLAIN ARE PROTECTED REGARDLESS OF SPECIES FLOODPLAIN PROTECTION SECTION 15 03. 034H. STREETSCAPE PROTECTION STREETSCAPE TREES SHALL BE PROTECTED. I THINK IT'S 150FT BACK FROM THE ROAD PROTECTED. THAT DOESN'T MEAN BULLDOZED DESIGN INTEGRATION REQUIREMENT. PROTECTED TREES MUST BE INTEGRATED INTO THE SITE DESIGN. TIME'S UP, MR. ROBERT. THANK YOU. GOSH, IT GOES FAST, DOESN'T IT? YES, SIR. MR. SCOTT. SURE. SO THIS IS THE SAME PROPERTY, SAME PROJECT AGAIN. THERE'S NOTCHING OUT THE CORNER WITH THE LIFT STATION PROPOSED. SO THAT WAY IT'S ON A PROPERTY THAT'S OWNED BY THE DEVELOPER AND NOT OWNED BY THE CITY. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS. ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR PUBLIC HEARING NUMBER TWO. I MOVE THAT WE CLOSE COMMENTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING. NUMBER TWO, HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER NILA. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MEYER. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A SUBDIVISION. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR MANOR HEIGHTS. PHASE SIX BEING 12 LOTS ON 47.66 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING TCAT PARCEL 236952 AND 902644. ALSO KNOWN AS 13201 OAK HILL ROAD, MAYNARD, TEXAS. I DO HAVE SAVANNAH. I APOLOGIZE, MY COMMENTS ARE FOR NUMBER FOUR. OKAY. MISS DONNA. THANK YOU. MR. SCOTT. SORRY, SORRY SORRY.SO THIS PRELIMINARY PLOT IS A REVISION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT. SO THEY'RE REDUCING ONE OF THE LOTS. SO IT'S GOING FROM 13 LOTS TO 12. BUT THAT'S BECAUSE THEY'RE COMBINING TWO LOTS. SO IT WAS PREVIOUSLY TWO SMALLER LOTS. AND THEN ONE LARGER LOT ONE EIGHT ACRE ONE. SO YEAH IT'S ON THE EXHIBIT THERE. YOU CAN SEE THERE'S THE PAD SITES THAT FRONT 290 THE FIVE PAD SITES THERE ON THE THE WEST SIDE OF THAT FUTURE ROAD. AND THAT LARGE RECTANGULAR BOX ABOVE WAS TWO LOTS. AND NOW IT'S PROPOSED TO BE ONE LARGE LOT. MR. DUNLOP, DOES THAT DO EITHER OF THOSE LOTS HAVE ENTITLEMENTS THAT ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE ENTITLEMENTS OF THE LOTS AT THE FRONT ON THIS, ON THE STREET FRONTAGE, LIKE ARE THOSE ALLOWED FOR SELF STORAGE OR ANY OTHER NON-REVENUE USE THERE? THOSE LOTS ARE THE SAME.
THAT SELF STORAGE RESTRICTION WAS FURTHER BACK. IT MIGHT HAVE ALREADY APPLIED TO THOSE TWO LOTS. THERE'S NO. THAT REQUIREMENT TO SELF STORAGE WAS TO BE ALLOWED WAS FURTHER BACK INTO THE COMMERCIAL AREA. MORE OFF OF OLD KIMBRO. KIMBRO OKAY. WOULD THAT REMEDIATION WAS THAT OTHER PARCEL. YES. THE OTHER. YEAH. THE FLOODPLAIN AND THAT REMEDIATION. YES OKAY. YEAH.
THIS IS C TWO OR C ONE. THIS IS C YEAH. THIS IS C-2 WITH RESTRICTIONS I BELIEVE. CORRECT.
YEAH. SO IT'S C-1 AND C-2 UNDER THE PUD. OKAY. WITH A COUPLE USES EXCLUDED, I BELIEVE. ANY MORE QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? I MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ITEM. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MEYER. DO I HAVE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER STETSON? ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONING APPLICATION. AMENDMENT FOR THE MANOR HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, APPROXIMATELY 1655 LOTS ON FIVE FOUR, 548.5 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
[00:20:06]
AND BEING LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF US HIGHWAY 290 AND OAK HILL ROAD, MAJOR TEXAS, FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO PLAN UNIT DEPLOYMENT. YEAH. MISS SAVANNAH.JUST STATE YOUR NAME FOR US. HI. YEAH, MY NAME IS SAVANNAH. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF ME AND MY FIANCE, DANIEL MORRELL, WHO ARE RESIDENTS OF CAROLINE. AND WE HAPPEN TO BE ON WILLIAM TYLER WAY, JUST BORDERING THAT FLOODPLAIN. AND I'M HERE TONIGHT BECAUSE A KIND NEIGHBOR OF OURS INFORMED US ABOUT THIS. NOTICE THAT WE GOT IN THE MAIL. AND I THINK THAT A LOT OF US THAT ARE HERE TONIGHT FROM OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ARE STILL TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PROPOSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, WHAT THE DIFFERENCE IS BETWEEN THAT AND THAT. THERE'S NO PLANS HERE OTHER THAN WHERE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD CURRENTLY EXISTS, OR WHAT WILL BE BUILT IS GOING TO HAPPEN. MYSELF, ALONG WITH A FEW PEOPLE IN ATTENDANCE THIS EVENING, LIVE ON LOTS THAT WE PAID A PREMIUM FOR, AND THERE'S A FLOODPLAIN BEHIND US, AND THE CONCERN IS THAT WE'RE NOW GOING TO HAVE BUILDINGS BEHIND US. SO A LOT OF US ARE HERE TO TRY AND FIND OUT MORE INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT THAT MEANS AND WHAT THAT MEANS FOR US, AND WHAT IS IN IT FOR US. IF THAT'S THE CASE, BECAUSE WE HAVE NO ONE BEHIND US, AND WE BUILT OUR HOMES THERE WITH THE INTENTION THAT THIS WOULD NOT BE ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL AND OR COMMERCIAL USE. UNFORTUNATELY, WE CAN'T RESPOND. BUT YEAH, I WE HEARD YOU. WE HAVE MISS DONNA. MY NAME IS DONNA BRUMFIELD. THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME SPEAK. I'LL START BY POINTING TO THE OBVIOUS TRAFFIC AND MANER IS ALREADY UNTENABLE. OUR INFRASTRUCTURE IS WOEFULLY INADEQUATE FOR THE ALREADY EXISTING DEVELOPMENT WE HAVE.
IF THIS IS EXPECTED, ANTICIPATED, WHAT KINDS OF INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS CAN WE EXPECT SO THAT LIFE HERE CAN CONTINUE TO BE MADE OR CAN CONTINUE TO BE TRULY LIVABLE? I WOULD ALSO ECHO SAVANNAH'S CONCERN THAT WE WERE TOLD, WITH WHAT APPEARED TO BE A HIGH DEGREE OF CERTAINTY, THAT PAYING A PREMIUM FOR A LOT, THAT LOOKS BACK ON THE GREENBELT BECAUSE IT WAS NOT GOING TO BE DEVELOPED, THAT THOSE CLAIMS WERE ACTUALLY BEING MADE IN GOOD FAITH. NOW IT APPEARS THERE'S AN ADVERSE IMPACT LIKELY ON OUR PROPERTY VALUES, AND WE'RE LOCKED IN TO PAYING HIGHER MORTGAGES AS A RESULT. I DON'T KNOW IF THIS PROPOSAL IS TRULY A PROPOSAL OR IF THIS IMPENDING DEVELOPMENT IS A DONE DEAL, BUT I WOULD URGE YOU TO CONSIDER THE NEEDS OF THE EXISTING HOMEOWNERS AND THE ADVERSE IMPACTS THAT ARE THREATENED TO US. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. WE HAVE A PLEASE DON'T FORGIVE ME IF I MESS THIS UP. P I O R T. PETER ZALEWSKI.
HELLO. I'M NEW HERE AND I AM PETER ZALEWSKI. I'M THE HOMEOWNER ON WILLIAM TYLER WAY, AND I OPPOSE THIS REZONING FOR TWO REASONS HERE. ONE IS THE FOUR STARS FLOOD HISTORY IN THEIR BARRINGTON SUBDIVISION. ALL 283 HOMES FLOODED DURING HURRICANE HARVEY. HOMEOWNERS HAD SUED, CLAIMING THAT FOUR STAR KNEW THE FLOOD RISK, BUT THEY DID NOT DISCLOSE IT.
SECONDLY, THERE WERE SMALLER HOMES CONCERNS, REDUCING FROM 1500 TO 1000FT■!S. THAT CHANGES THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S CHARACTER AND PROPERTY VALUES. TRAVIS COUNTY RANKS IN THE TOP 10% FOR
[00:25:04]
FLOOD DAMAGE NATIONALLY. PLEASE DENY THIS REZONING AND DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. WE HAVE. MISS LINDA. KNAPTON. PLEASE FORGIVE ME FOR MESSING. HI, MY NAME IS LINDA.THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME SPEAK. I ALSO LIVE ON WILLIAM TYLER WAY. I ALSO PAID PREMIUM FOR MY LOT SO THAT I WOULDN'T HAVE A NEIGHBOR. THIS IS. I'M NEW TO MANOR. I'VE ONLY BEEN HERE A YEAR. THIS WAS ATTRACTIVE TO ME BECAUSE I DIDN'T WANT NEIGHBORS. NOW THERE'S AN UNDERSTANDING THAT WE COULD POSSIBLY BUILD HOUSES BACK THERE. WE PAID PREMIUM FOR THESE LOTS. ARE WE GOING TO BE REIMBURSED FOR THESE LOTS THAT WE PAID PREMIUM PRICE FOR SO THAT WE WOULDN'T HAVE NEIGHBORS? WHEN YOU START BUILDING SMALLER HOMES, YOU'RE GOING TO DEVALUE ALL THESE LARGER HOMES. THAT'S ANOTHER CONCERN OF MINE, IS WE'RE PAYING PREMIUM PRICE FOR OUR HOMES, AND THEN YOU'RE GOING TO BUILD THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT HOMES. AND. YOU MAY OR MAY NOT GET GOOD, REPUTABLE PEOPLE IN THOSE HOMES. AND THEN WHAT IS THAT GOING TO DO TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD? WE ALREADY HAVE PROBLEMS WITH PARKING. I JUST WORRY ABOUT WHAT IT'S GOING TO DO TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN IN GENERAL. THAT'S MY CONCERN. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I HAVE A FERNANDO. HI, MY NAME IS FERNANDO. THIS IS MY NEIGHBOR, MARTIN ROTTMANN. I'M SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF TWO OTHER NEIGHBORS THAT UNFORTUNATELY COULD NOT MAKE IT HERE TONIGHT.
OUR CONCERNS ARE A LITTLE MORE SPECIFIC. THE WE LOOKED AT THE PRELIMINARY LAYOUT UPLOADED BY THE DEVELOPER FOR PHASE EIGHT. YEAH. BETWEEN PHASE EIGHT AND PHASE THREE ON THE EASTERNMOST CORNER, THERE IS ACTUALLY A CREEK THAT IS FUNCTIONING AS A NATURAL DRAINAGE CHANNEL. AND IT DID A LOT OF HEAVY LIFTING IN THE LAST SPRING WHEN WE HAD THOSE MAJOR MASSIVE RAINS. AND YES, IT'S IT'S IT'S SUFFICIENCY IS CURRENTLY BEING STRAINED. WE ACTUALLY HAD THE CITY ENGINEER, PAULA PAULINE. SORRY, COME TAKE A LOOK. AND SHE ALSO ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THIS CREEK IS VERY MUCH NECESSARY. SO WE WERE A LITTLE BIT CONCERNED BECAUSE IT WAS NOT MARKED ON THAT MAP, BECAUSE PER THAT MAP, IT'S GOING TO HAVE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES DEVELOPED ALL THE WAY TO THAT EDGE. SO WE SORRY. YEAH. WE URGE YOU TO REJECT THIS MAP AS IS AND REQUEST AN AMENDMENT ALLOWING SOME MORE SPACE BETWEEN THOSE OR IDEALLY REMOVING THAT VERY EASTERN LOT OF HOUSES, ROW OF HOUSES TOGETHER ENTIRELY ON THAT SIDE OF THAT ROAD. BUT AT THE VERY LEAST, THE CREEK AND SOME SPACE WOULD BE GREAT BECAUSE WE HAVE VERY, VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE FLOODING. IT'S KIND OF VERY BORDERLINE MANAGEABLE RIGHT NOW. AND HAVING AN EXTRA SET OF HOUSES THERE THAT'S GOING TO HAVE MORE DRAINING INTO THAT FLOOD, THAT THAT CREEK IS DEFINITELY GOING TO MAKE IT OVERFLOW. SO YES, AND WE'RE ASSUMING, OF COURSE, THEY DON'T BLOCK THAT CREEK ENTIRELY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. RODMAN, IS THAT YOU? YEAH.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK OR. SURE. OKAY. I'M DOCTOR MARTIN RODMAN. I AM ALSO LIVING IN THAT AREA AROUND THE THIRD DIVISION OVER THERE. AND I ECHO MY NEIGHBORS COMMENTS AND CONCERNS ABOUT THE RISK OF BLOCKING THAT CREEK. AT THIS MOMENT. THE THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL ALLOWS FOR A SPACE OVER THERE TO BE HOUSES TO BUILD STRAIGHT INTO AND UP INTO THE EDGE OF THAT CREEK AND HALFWAY INTO THE CREEK. AND WE REJECT WE REQUEST THE COMMITTEE TO REJECT AND ASK THAT AMENDMENT IN THAT SPACE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MR. SCOTT. SURE.
SO THIS REZONING, IT IS AN AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING PUD. AND THAT'S WHY IT'S THE NOTICE
[00:30:06]
AS IT'S REZONING PUD TO PUD, JUST BECAUSE IT'S THE ZONING CHANGE. IT'S NOT, YOU KNOW, GOING FROM COMMERCIAL TO RESIDENTIAL OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IT'S JUST PUTT TO PUTT WHEN THEY GET AMENDED. AND SO WHAT THIS AMENDMENT IS DOING IS SOME RESIDENTS HAD SAID IT IS REDUCING THE MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZE FOR A PORTION OF THE SUBDIVISION SO THAT THE AREAS THAT ARE AFFECTED BY THIS AMENDMENT ARE SECTIONS FOUR, FIVE, SEVEN AND EIGHT. SO THEY'RE ALL ON THE WEST SIDE OF LIBERTY BELL. SO IF YOU'RE ON THE EAST SIDE OF LIBERTY BELL, SO THEY'RE ON WILLIAM TYLER. THAT'S ALREADY BUILT OUT. IT DOESN'T NECESSARILY AFFECT THAT AREA. AND THERE ISN'T PLANS TO DEVELOP THE FLOODPLAIN BEHIND THOSE HOUSES, BECAUSE THAT IS FLOODPLAIN THAT'S ACTUALLY BEEN DEDICATED TO THE CITY. SO THOSE AREAS THAT YOU'VE PAID A PREMIUM FOR, THERE'S NO LOTS THERE'S NO DEVELOPMENT HAPPENING BEHIND YOU. IT'S ALL ON EXISTING LOTS THAT ARE PLATTED. SO AGAIN, THOSE SECTIONS 4 OR 5, SEVEN AND EIGHT THAT ARE ALREADY PLATTED ARE, YOU KNOW, IN THE PROCESS OF BEING PLOTTED FOR SECTION SEVEN AND EIGHT, THOSE LOTS, I BELIEVE THEY'RE LIKE 50 FOOT OR 60 FOOT WIDE LOTS RIGHT NOW, THE MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZE. SO THE CONDITIONED SPACE ARE HEATED AND COOLED. SPACE IS 1500 SQUARE FEET. AND THIS AMENDMENT I KNOW IT'S SMALL ON THE TV SCREENS UP THERE. IT ALLOWS THE DEVELOPER TO REDUCE THE DWELLING UNIT SIZE. AND FOR EVERY 100FT■!S OF CONDITIONED SPACE, THEY REDUCE IT DOWN TO 1000FT■!S. THEY HAVE TO INCREASE THEIR EXTERIOR FRONT FACADE MASONRY BY 10%. SO RIGHT NOW, WHAT'S REQUIRED IN THE SUBDIVISION FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS IS A MINIMUM 1500 SQUARE FOOT CONDITIONED SPACE HOUSE WITH 30% FRONT MASONRY.AND WHAT'S PROPOSED IS TO GO DOWN, DOWN TO POTENTIALLY 1000 SQUARE FOOT HOME THAT HAS, I BELIEVE IT'S 60% OR 7070. THANK YOU. SO THERE'S SOME SORT OF, YOU KNOW, ESTHETICS AND VALUE THERE. BUT DEVELOPER YOU KNOW, THEY YOU KNOW, THEY CAME TO US AND SAID YOU KNOW THE MARKET'S CHANGING AND THEY WANTED TO EXPLORE THIS OPTION. WE WORKED WITH THEM TO PUT THE LIMITS.
AND SO THEY ARE LIMITED TO 20% WITHIN EACH SIZE CATEGORY WITHIN EACH PHASE. SO SOMEONE SCROLL A LITTLE BIT. SO SECTION FIVE FOR EXAMPLE HAS 195 LOTS ON IT. AND SO WITHIN EACH OF THOSE 20% CATEGORIES THAT'S 39 HOUSES. SO OF THE 195 YOU'D HAVE 39 HOUSES THAT ARE 1000 TO 1100 SQUARE FEET. SO IN TOTAL IN THAT PHASE, FOR INSTANCE, OF 195 HOUSES, 156 COULD BE BELOW 1500 SQUARE FEET. IF THEY ALL MET THAT 20% MAXIMUM THAT'S PROPOSED WITH THIS AMENDMENT.
SO IT ISN'T SAYING THAT, YOU KNOW, 100% OF THE HOUSES THAT CAN BE BUILT ARE GOING TO BE AT 1000FT■!S. THERE ARE WE WORKED WITH THEM TO HAVE SOME GUARDRAILS, BUFFERS ON THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT AND THE PERCENTAGES WITHIN EACH OF THOSE HOME SIZES WITHIN THOSE TWO SECTIONS THAT ARE STILL ADDING HOUSES. SO IT WOULDN'T BE FOR PHASES TWO AND THREE, JUST FOR THE CONTINUED BUILD OUT FOR FIVE, SEVEN AND EIGHT AND THEN COMMISSION, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM. ANY QUESTIONS COMMISSIONERS. I KNOW THIS IS ABOUT THE THIS IS RELATED TO THE BUSINESS. THIS IS ALSO MIMICKED IN THE BUSINESS ITEM LATER ON IN THE AGENDA. BUT ON THAT TABLE THAT YOU'RE REFERENCING ON THE BACK, ON THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON PAGE TWO, THAT SIDE THE FAR RIGHT COLUMN, IT SAYS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PER SECTION BELOW THE CURRENT 16 SQUARE FOOT DWELLING UNIT MINIMUM IS THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. SO THERE'D BE A. SO LET'S TAKE SECTION FOUR A, WHICH I THOUGHT WAS LARGELY COMPLETED. SO I'M SURPRISED TO SEE THIS HERE. BUT 160 LOTS WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE ABOVE THE THE 1500 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM. CORRECT. OR BELOW. SO YEAH, SECTION IS PRETTY MUCH BUILT OUT. BUT THE WAY IT'S WORDED, YOU KNOW, IT'S JUST BY THE TOTAL NUMBER IN THE SECTION. SO YEAH. SO SECTION FOUR A HAS 198 LOTS IN IT. CORRECT. AND ON THE TABLE THE 160 REPRESENTS PRETTY MUCH 80% OF WHAT'S THERE. SO THAT'S SAYING THAT 80% OF THE HOUSE IS YOU KNOW, SHOULD THIS BE APPROVED ARE REQUIRED TO BE ABOVE THE 1500. THEY WOULD BE THEY COULD BE BELOW. SO THAT'S WHAT'S SAYING HOW MANY HOUSES COULD BE BELOW.
BECAUSE IT'S 20% IN EACH CATEGORY. AND SO OH ON THAT TABLE IT SAYS YOU COULD HAVE YOU KNOW, 40 HOUSES MAKES IT. AND THIS IS EXCLUDING THE MEDIUM DENSITY LOTS THOUGH, RIGHT. ALREADY APPROVED THROUGH MULTIPLE AMENDMENTS INCLUDING MOVING THE GARAGES TO THE FRONT,
[00:35:03]
WHICH EVERYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE AND COMMUNITY KNOW. I WAS NOT SO HAPPY TO SEE. BUT SORRY, I DON'T KNOW WHY YOU DO A RELOAD GARAGE ON A FRONT LOAD GARAGE ON A 30 FOOT WIDE HOUSE, BUT THAT'S ANOTHER STORY FOR ANOTHER DAY. BUT SO THIS IS IN ADDITION TO THOSE AMENDMENTS, THAT MEDIUM DENSITY SECTION THAT'S CREATED PARKING POCKETS AND OTHER THINGS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WERE NOT PART OF THE ORIGINAL PLAT. CORRECT? YES. YEAH. THIS DOESN'T AFFECT THE THE MEDIUM DENSITY LOTS, WHICH THERE'S ONE THAT'S BUILT NOW. THAT WOULD BE TOWNHOMES, BUILT AS TOWNHOMES. IT'S A PRIVATE LOT ACROSS FROM THE AMENITY CENTER. YEAH. BUT THE OTHER TWO SECTIONS OF MEDIUM DENSITY LOTS, WHICH ARE IN TOTAL HAVE 169 OF THOSE LOTS ARE 40 FOOT WIDE WITHIN THE MEDIUM DENSITY. THOSE DON'T HAVE DWELLING UNIT. SO THIS WOULD ADD 576 TO THE EXISTING 169 HOMES THAT ARE ALREADY MEDIUM DENSITY FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT ARE DESIGNED TO MEET THE THE DIVERSITY GOALS FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD ORIGINALLY IN THE POD. THIS WOULD HAVE IF IT WERE APPROVED, 576 HOUSES, POTENTIALLY 576 THAT ARE BELOW 1500 SQUARE FEET. OKAY, THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE THE 169 FOR THE MEDIUM DENSITY, WHERE THERE'S NO DWELLING UNIT SIZE MINIMUM. BUT AS YOU MENTIONED BEFORE, SECTION FOUR IS PRETTY MUCH MOSTLY BUILT OUT. SO MAY NOT ACTUALLY BE THAT MANY HOUSES I PROBABLY SHOULD RESERVE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE BUSINESS SECTION, BUT THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE CLARIFICATION STUFF. YEAH. ANY MORE QUESTIONS COMMISSIONERS? I MOVE, WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM. I'M SO SORRY. ITEM FOUR HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. ITEM NUMBER FOUR BY COMMISSIONER STATS. LYNN, DO I HAVE A SECOND SECOND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NILA? ALL IN FAVOR? NAYS. CONSENT AGENDA. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED[CONSENT AGENDA]
TO BE SELF-EXPLANATORY BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, AND WILL BE ENACTED WITH ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSIONS OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE CHAIRPERSON OR A COMMISSIONER COMMISSION MEMBER, IN WHICH THE EVENT OF THE ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED SEPARATELY CONSIDERED. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER THE 12TH, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONER COMMISSION. REGULAR SESSION. I'LL MAKE A POINT OF ORDER. NO. MR. CHAIR.YES, MA'AM. IT WAS BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION THAT THE THIRD ITEM DOWN UNDERNEATH THE STAFF, CITY STAFF, WHO WAS IN ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING, IT SAYS ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY AND MISS PAGES ARE ATTORNEY. AND SO ASSISTANT NEEDS TO BE STRICKEN. OKAY. IF YOU WOULD, PLEASE INCLUDE THAT IN YOUR MOTION. COMMISSIONER, I MOVE APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THE AMENDMENT THAT WE STRIKE. ASSISTANT FROM MISS PAGE SIGNS TITLE ON PAGE ONE. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER STETSON. DO I HAVE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NILA? ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES. REGULAR AGENDA. CONSIDER DISCUSSION AND
[REGULAR AGENDA]
POSSIBLE ACTION ON SUBDIVISION CONCEPT PLAN. AMENDMENT FOR MANOR DOWNS INDUSTRIAL BEING SEVEN LOTS ON 146.92 ACRES MORE OR LESS AND BEING TCAB PARCEL 2479 7224 7974 2479.8724798624798424797347738924799, AND BEING LOCATED AT 8916 HILL LANE MANOR, TEXAS.
[00:40:02]
COMMISSIONERS. WE DO HAVE MR. TIM CRAFTON HERE AND MAGGIE HERE FOR TO SPEAK ON THIS.ACTUALLY. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONER TIM CRAFTON DOLPHIN INDUSTRIAL I'M JUST I JUST PUT MY NAME DOWN TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. IF ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS. YEP. MR. SCOTT SURE.
SO UNDER THE PUBLIC HEARING, THEY'RE JUST AMENDING THE FUTURE CITY LOT TO NOTCH OUT THE CORNER TO PUT THE LIFT STATION ON THEIR PRIVATE PROPERTY. SINCE IT'S A PRIVATE LIFT STATION THAT WAY, IT'S NOT ON THE CITY'S OWNED PROPERTY. AND THEN HAVING TO DO LICENSING, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS AND ALL THAT. IT'S A LITTLE EASIER DOWN THE LINE TO SAY IT'S ON YOUR PROPERTY, IT'S YOURS. AND AGAIN, THE LIFT STATION IS ALWAYS BEEN PROPOSED TO BE THERE. SO WHEN IT WAS, YOU KNOW, ONE LARGER LOT WITHOUT THE LIFT STATION NOTCHED OUT ON IT, THE STATION IS STILL GOING TO BE THERE. AND THAT WAS WHAT WAS APPROVED. THE AGREEMENT THROUGH VARIOUS CONCEPT PLANS AS WE WENT ALONG. SO THEY'RE NOT ADDING IT THERE AND THEN ASKING FOR THIS CHANGE LIKE IT'S ALWAYS BEEN PROPOSED TO BE THERE. WE'RE JUST SORT OF CLEANING UP SOME OF THE OWNERSHIP ON IT. JUST FOR MY CURIOSITY, ARE THEY THEY'RE BEING SERVICED BY CITY OF AUSTIN, BY AUSTIN WATER OR BY ANOTHER WATER UTILITY SERVICE, NOT CITY OF MANOR WATER.
CORRECT. IT'LL BE MANOR WATER. OKAY. BUT IT'LL BE IT'LL BE YOUR COMMERCIAL OR IT'LL BE A COMMERCIAL STATION THAT'LL EVENTUALLY THAT LIFT STATION IS MANOR SEWER. OKAY. AND WE WILL BE MANVILLE WATER. THAT'S RIGHT. YEAH. OH, THAT'S SO FUNNY. OKAY, SO IT'S LIKE HALF AND HALF YOU TAKE AND YOU GIVE WE. THAT'S INTERESTING. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SO THIS IS THIS IS FOR YOUR EFFLUENT OR THIS IS FOR YOUR INTAKE. THE LIFT STATION. OH IT WOULD BE FOR EFFLUENT.
YEAH. SO YOU COULD SEND IT TO US OKAY. THANK YOU. YEAH. SURE. YOU CAN GIVE IT BACK. AND THEN, IF I MAY, OUR ENGINEERS HAVE APPROVED IT. SO THIS IS A SUBDIVISION NON-DISCRETIONARY.
SO WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. BUT AS I MENTIONED BEFORE I HAVE TO CONCUR WITH SOME EXHIBITS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, WHICH WILL COME PROBABLY NEXT MONTH. THE CITY COUNCIL, WE'RE JUST ASKING FOR CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PENDING THOSE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENTS. ANY MORE QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? MAY ATTAIN RECEIVE A MOTION FOR REGULAR AGENDA. ITEM NUMBER SIX. I MOVE APPROVAL OF ITEM SIX. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER STETSON. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SORRY. DID YOU WANT TO ADD THE CONDITION JUST TO.
I'M SO SORRY. I'M JUST GOING TO GO TO THE SUMMARY FORM BECAUSE IT'LL BE EASIER THAT WAY.
SUMMARY. OH, IT DOESN'T EVEN HAVE IT. YEAH. I MOVE APPROVAL OF ITEM SIX PENDING THE. I'M SO SORRY. HOLD ON STAFF. WHAT IS HAPPENING IN IN IN WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH COUNCIL. THEY'RE GOING TO BE AMENDING THE OR UPDATING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. YES. YEAH. THERE'S EXHIBITS WITHIN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REGARDING THIS PROPERTY OKAY. AND SO WE NEED THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO CONCUR WITH WHAT'S TRANSPIRING TONIGHT. RIGHT NOW OURS WOULD BE IN IN IN IN CONFLICT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IF WE APPROVE TONIGHT. ALL RIGHT. YES, YES. JUST APPROVE WITH THE CONDITION. LOOKING AS A COMMISSION. YES. COMMISSIONERS.
THANK YOU FOR THAT. COMMISSIONERS, I MOVE APPROVAL OF ITEM SIX. PENDING THE MODIFICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THIS PARCEL OR THIS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT, I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER STETSON. DO I HAVE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NILA? ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES CONSIDERED. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON SUBDIVISION. PRELIMINARY PLAT AMENDMENT FOR MAYNARD DOWNS. INDUSTRIAL BEING SEVEN LOTS ON 146.920 ACRES MORE OR LESS AND BEING TCAB PARCEL 2479 7224 7974 2479.
8724798624798424797347738924799, AND BEING LOCATED AT 8916 HILL LANE, MAYNARD, TEXAS.
COMMISSIONERS. THE SAME FOLKS ARE STILL HERE FOR THOSE QUESTIONS NEEDED. MR. SCOTT.
YEP. SO THIS IS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOLLOWING THAT CONCEPT PLAN. SAME THING. ENGINEERS HAVE APPROVED THIS. SO AS A NON-DISCRETIONARY ITEM YOU'RE ABLE TO APPROVE IT. AND AGAIN
[00:45:04]
WITH THE CONDITION THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MODIFICATION, ANY QUESTIONS COMMISSIONERS. ANY QUESTIONS. DO I HAVE A MOTION. HERE WE GO. I MOVE APPROVAL OF ITEM SEVEN ON THE CONDITION OF THE ADJUSTMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO. FOR THE MANOR DOWNS PROJECT. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER STETSON. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MEYER. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES. CONSIDERING DISCUSSION.
POSSIBLE ACTION ON SUBDIVISION. SUBDIVISION. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR MANOR HEIGHTS. PHASE SIX BEING 12 LOTS ON 47.66 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING TCAB PARCEL 236952 AND 902644. ALSO KNOWN AS 132010 KIMBRELL ROAD, MAYNARD, TEXAS. MR. SCOTT YES. SO THIS PLAT, IT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY OUR ENGINEERS. SO WE'RE SEEKING APPROVAL AND THEN NON-DISCRETIONARY ITEM THEY ARE.
THIS IS A REVISION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAT WHERE THEY'RE COMBINING TWO LOTS. SO IT'S GOING FROM 13 LOTS DOWN TO 12 BUT IS MAKING ONE LARGE I THINK IT'S EIGHT AND A HALF ACRE LOT FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. ANY QUESTIONS COMMISSIONERS. ANY QUESTIONS.
DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MEYER. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NILA. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED.
MOTION PASSES. CONSIDERING DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A REZONING APPLICATION AMENDMENT FOR THE MANOR HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, APPROXIMATELY 1655 LOTS ON FIVE FOR 8.5 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. AND BEING LOCATED AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF US HIGHWAY 290 AND OLD KIMBROUGH ROAD, MAYNARD, TEXAS. FROM PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, MR. SCOTT. SO AGAIN, THIS ONE IS ALLOWING A REDUCTION IN THE DWELLING UNIT SIZE. THE CONDITION SPACE ARE HEATED AND COOLED SPACE FROM A RANGE. SO RIGHT NOW THE REQUIREMENT IS 1500. THEY CAN GO DOWN TO 1000FT■!S FOR SECTIONS 4 OR 5, SEVEN AND EIGHT. THE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS WITHIN THOSE SECTIONS. BUT THEY ARE EACH OF THOSE DRILLING UNIT SIZE CATEGORIES OR RANGES IS LIMITED TO 20% WITHIN EACH SECTION THAT THEY'RE IN. AND THEN, AS WAS DISCUSSED BEFORE, THIS DOESN'T APPLY TO THE MEDIUM DENSITY. THOSE 40 FOOT LOTS THAT WERE CREATED. THOSE ARE JUST LIMITED TO OVERALL DENSITY. THERE'S ANOTHER DWELLING UNIT REQUIREMENT ON THOSE DWELLING UNIT SIZE REQUIREMENT. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? ENGINEER. ENGINEER. THEY NEVER SEND PEOPLE THAT KNOW. BUT DO YOU KNOW MUCH TO BE FAIR. YEAH.
WELL HE'S USUALLY NOT PREPARED TO ANSWER OUR QUESTIONS EITHER. I DO HAVE A QUESTION THOUGH.
JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND WHO YOU ARE. SARAH STARKEY WITH KIMLEY-HORN. THANK YOU. HI, MISS STARKEY. CAN YOU SPEAK TO THE DWELLING UNIT SIZES THAT ARE LEADED FOR. AND I UNDERSTAND YOU'RE FOR FOUR STAR. YOU DON'T NECESSARILY CONTROL WHAT'S HAPPENED. WHAT HAPPENS TO THE PROPERTY. WELL, YOU'RE WITH YOU'RE WITH KIMLEY-HORN WHO REPRESENTS WHO DEVELOPS OR DESIGNS FOR FOUR STAR, WHO THEN SELLS THE LOTS TO BUILDERS WHO THEN BUILD THESE, THESE PROPERTIES BASED ON THEIR PLANS. SO THREE PEOPLE DOWN THE LINE, WE KIND OF END UP WITH THESE LOT SIZES. BUT ARE YOU AWARE OF WHAT THE DWELLING UNIT SIZES ARE FOR THE THE AREAS OF THIS THAT I BROUGHT UP EARLIER THAT THE MEDIUM DENSITY PORTIONS OF THESE PARTS OF THESE PHASES, YES. SO THE AMENDMENT TO THE PUD DOES NOT APPLY TO THE MEDIUM DENSITY SINCE IT'S A.
OKAY. SORRY. SO WHAT ARE THE SIZES OF THOSE HOMES THAT ARE IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY AREA. ARE YOU AWARE OF THOSE SQUARE FOOTAGES THAT ARE THAT ARE IN THOSE AREAS? I AM NOT BECAUSE IT STILL IT'S STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION RIGHT NOW JUST ON THE CIVIL SIDE. SO THE NO HOMES HAVE BEEN BUILT YET. OKAY. IS YOUR APPLICANT AMENABLE TO 5% LIMITS FOR EACH CATEGORY? I
[00:50:01]
BELIEVE THE DISCUSSION WAS 20%. WAS WHAT THEY WERE COMING IN HOPEFUL WITH. AND THAT WAS REALLY JUST COMING AT IT FROM AN AFFORDABILITY STANDPOINT, FROM THE FEEDBACK THEY'VE GOTTEN FROM HOME BUILDERS, IS THAT THEY REALLY NEED A MORE AFFORDABLE PRODUCT OUT HERE.AND THAT'S THAT'S ABOUT THE LIMIT OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I DON'T KNOW IF SCOTT HAD FURTHER, THESE HOMES ARE SELLING FOR $100,000 LESS THAN THEY WERE TWO YEARS AGO. SO I'M A LITTLE AND I KNOW AND I KNOW THAT ONE OF THE BUILDERS THAT THEY ARE THAT IS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS BROUGHT IN A DIFFERENT PRODUCT LINE. DRB HAS BROUGHT IN A DIFFERENT PRODUCT LINE TO MEET THAT CHANGE IN IN SCOPE. AND I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW SMALLER HOMES ON LOTS WILL ACTUALLY ON LOTS THAT ARE STILL 60FT OR 50FT WIDE, AND IT'S GOING TO SATISFY THAT NEED, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU HAVE FOUR STAR DEVELOPING. THERE'S THREE OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS THAT FOUR STAR HAS IN OUR JURISDICTIONAL LIMITS RIGHT NOW. I CAN'T SPEAK TO THE HOME BUILDER SIDE BECAUSE I DON'T GET INVOLVED ON THAT SIDE, OKAY, PER SE, BUT WHAT I CAN SPEAK TO IS THAT THE REDUCTION IN THE DWELLING UNIT SIZE, THE CAVEAT WAS THEN THE INCREASED MASONRY REQUIREMENTS, AND THAT, PER MY UNDERSTANDING, HAD BEEN DONE ON PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OR EXCUSE ME, THE REASON IT WAS BROUGHT INTO THE PUD IS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. AND SO IT HAD BEEN DISCUSSED IN, I BELIEVE, IN OTHER DEVELOPMENTS AROUND HERE WHEN THIS IDEA HAD BEEN BROUGHT UP. THIS WAS KIND OF THE SWITCH OFF WAS CAPPING THE THE MINIMUM UNIT, MAXIMUM UNIT PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE, EXCUSE ME. AND THEN INCREASING THE MASONRY REQUIREMENTS. OKAY. MR. DUNLOP, YOU WERE HERE WHEN THIS WAS ORIGINALLY. THIS WAS ORIGINALLY BROUGHT FORWARD IN 2017 OR 18. THE PHASES TWO. PHASE TWO HAD A HIGHER LIMIT. HAD THE MASONRY REQUIREMENT WAS REDUCED AFTER PHASE TWO WAS COMPLETED. IS THAT CORRECT. AFTER PHASE ONE.
SO TWO THROUGH NOW OKAY. SO THIS THIS POD HAS HAD LOWER MASONRY REQUIREMENTS FOR ITS EXISTENCE. YES OKAY. AND THOSE ARE LIKE 30%. IT'S 30%. AND IF I COULD THE WHAT WAS TALKING ABOUT MONARCH RANCH. THEY DID THIS. THEY WENT FROM 1700 DOWN TO 1300 AS THEIR MINIMUM, I BELIEVE, AND THE SAME THING. AND IT'S ACTUALLY BASED OFF A SECTION WITHIN OUR CODE, BECAUSE WHEN THE STATE LIMITED OUR CITY'S ABILITY TO REGULATE MASONRY, WE WROTE INTO OUR ZONING CODE THAT YOU COULD. YEAH. SO FOR AREAS NOT LIKE WITHIN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT WHERE WE CAN REGULATE MASONRY, IF YOU WANTED TO REDUCE YOUR DWELLING UNIT SIZE, THAT WAS ALLOWABLE THROUGH AN AGREEMENT APPROVED BY COUNCIL. BUT FOR EVERY 100FT■!S, YOU REDUCED YOUR DWELLING UNIT SIZE, YOU HAD AN INCREASE BY 10% OF EXTERIOR MASONRY. OKAY. AND SO AGAIN WE DID. MONARCH WAS PROPOSED TODAY HERE WITH CAROLINE HEIGHTS. IT IS BASED OFF THAT SECTION OF OUR CODE WHERE IT SORT OF ALLOWS THE REDUCTIONS IN DWELLING UNIT WITH INCREASES IN MASONRY. BUT WITH IT BEING A PUD, YOU HAVE THE DISCRETION TO. SET THOSE NUMBERS WHERE YOU FEEL ARE APPROPRIATE. ARE WE AUTHORIZED TO DENY? YES. THIS IS A DISCRETIONARY ITEM OKAY.
AND THEN IT WOULD THE RECOMMENDATION WOULD GO TO THE CITY COUNCIL. AND FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION. CONSIDERATION. YEAH OKAY. THE SO THEY'RE APPLYING THIS THEY'RE THEY'RE CASTING AN ENVELOPE TO ALLOW FOR SECTIONS FOUR A AND FOUR B, WHICH ARE, AS WE'VE STATED HERE DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION, ARE LARGELY PLATTED AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION OR FULLY COMPLETED. DOES THAT ALLOW FOR THE THEM TO KIND OF HAVE A CUMULATIVE OR IS IT LIMITED PER AREA? IT'S THE 20% IS PER PER PHASE. CORRECT. THEY'D BE CAPPED PER PHASE. YES. THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO TAKE IN CASH THOSE IN AND OR BANK THEM AND THEN TAKE THEM OVER TO PHASE SIX OR PHASE FIVE. NO. YEAH. THE WAY WE PUT IT IN, THERE WAS A NOTE SAYING THAT IT WAS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF SINGLE FAMILY LOTS WITHIN THAT PHASE. YEAH. SO THEY COULDN'T SAY, HEY, WE BUILT A TON OF, YOU KNOW, 1800 SQUARE FOOT HOMES IN SECTION TWO SO WE CAN FILL ALL OF SECTION EIGHT WITH, YOU KNOW, THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT HOMES. IT'S BASED ON THE NUMBER OF LOTS WITHIN THAT SECTION. AND THEN AGAIN, THERE ARE 20% WITHIN EACH CATEGORY. OKAY.
LET'S JUST GO. AND I HAVE A QUESTION. SO YOU KNOW, HEARING FROM OUR COMMUNITY MEMBERS WHEN WHEN THEY'RE BUYING THESE HOMES AND THESE DEVELOPERS ARE PROMISING THESE THINGS. AND THEN WE HAVE ANOTHER DEVELOPER COME IN, SAME DEVELOPER. SAME DEVELOPERS COME IN AND TELLING THESE PEOPLE, HEY, YOU GOT THIS LAND THAT'S NOT GOING TO BE BEHIND YOU. AND NOW HE'S COMING AND TURNING AROUND AND PUTTING A HOME WHERE HE'S DONE. TOLD COMMUNITY MEMBERS THERE WEREN'T
[00:55:04]
GOING TO BE. HOW DOES THAT WORK? THE DEVELOPER? THERE'S STILL THE LANDOWNER. YOU KNOW, THEY'RE ABLE TO MAKE THESE REQUESTS. SO IT IS JUST UP TO YOU ALL AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THEN ULTIMATELY CITY COUNCIL TO HEAR THAT AND MAKE DECISIONS ON IT. BUT THERE'S THERE'S NOTHING THAT PREVENTS THEM FROM FILING THESE APPLICATIONS. AND, YOU KNOW, WORKING WITH IT. AND I THINK FOR CLARIFICATION, THE AREA THAT THAT THE NEIGHBORS SPOKE OF TONIGHT IS, IS IN A FLOODPLAIN AND IN AN OPEN SPACE, CORRECT? YES. AND THAT'S NOT PROPOSED TO CHANGE. THERE'S NOTHING HAPPENING IN FLOODPLAINS OR BEHIND THESE HOUSES ON WILLIAM TYLER. YEAH. I AM CONFUSED WHY THE CITY PARKLAND IS BISECTED BETWEEN PHASES THREE AND EIGHT AND NOT CONTIGUOUS. MISS GRAY, ARE YOU ABLE TO SPEAK TO THAT OR OR OR CAN YOU SPEAK TO THAT TOO? HI. ENGINEER. APPLICANT, ENGINEER, CITY ENGINEER. YEAH. SO THAT WAS AMENDED WITH THE PUD IN I BELIEVE, LAST OCTOBER, NOVEMBER. SO SOMETIME IN 2024. AND SO IT WAS A IT WAS APPROVED AT THAT PNC AND THEN APPROVED AT THAT COUNCIL THAT THE PARKLAND WAS GOING TO BE ADDED BECAUSE PHASES SEVEN AND EIGHT WERE ADDED TO THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT, BECAUSE THE DEVELOPER DID NOT PREVIOUSLY OWN THOSE PARCELS, BUT IT WAS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. I MEAN, IT WAS LIKE THE NAGLE ESTATES. IT WAS JUST KIND OF SITTING THERE. BUT I'M ASKING LIKE, WHY WHEN YOU PLATTED IT, IS THIS A THIS IS A PLAT MAP, CORRECT? OR IS THIS A NO, THIS IS JUST THE NO, THIS IS JUST THE ZONING. JUST THE JUST THE ZONING. YES. I'M JUST TRYING TO I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHY YOU WOULD NOT HAVE THE 2.77 ACRES IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THREE, CONTIGUOUS WITH A 1.51 THAT'S KIND OF SQUEEZED IN RIGHT NEXT TO THE FOUR LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY ON THE OTHER SIDE. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? YEAH. IS THAT A TRAIL OR. I MEAN, IT'S NOT IT'S NOT MARKED AS A TRAIL. I'M JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHY. THAT'S NOT. WHY DON'T WE JUST MAKE IT LIKE THREE ACRES OR FOUR ACRES? I DON'T KNOW, MAKE IT A LITTLE PARK LIKE YOU HAVE GREEN, YOU HAVE GREEN AND A REALLY. AND YOU HAVE A REALLY WEIRD FENCE ALL OF A SUDDEN CAUSED BY NOT NATURE. AND THEN YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A LITTLE GREEN SLIVER TO THROW A BALL NEXT TO A FOUR LANE DIVIDED HIGHWAY. IS THAT THE DESIGN? THAT THAT'S THE DESIGN THAT I SEE, RIGHT. YEAH. SO I CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT BECAUSE THAT WASN'T I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND THE PUTT IS OPEN FOR INTERPRETATION RIGHT NOW IN TOTALITY. THAT WAS NOT THE INTENT OF AMENDING THIS PUD. IT WAS PREVIOUSLY BROUGHT IN TO THE PUD. THAT WAY OKAY. BUT I UNDERSTOOD ON YOUR CONCERN. THANK YOU. AND I AM HAPPY TO TALK TO THE DEVELOPER ABOUT THAT. IT'S NOT I THINK IT WOULD BE SOMETHING THEY'D BE HAPPY TO. YEAH. FIGURING OUT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. OF COURSE. ANY MORE QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? NO MORE QUESTIONS. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? OKAY, COMMISSIONERS, I MOVE, WE DENY. ITEM NINE. I HAVE A MOTION TO DENY ITEM NINE. DO I HAVE A SECOND? A SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER. I'M SORRY. I HAVE A MOTION TO DENY BY COMMISSIONER STETSON. AND I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NILA. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? MOTION DENIED. CONSIDERING DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON PAVING VARIANCE FOR THE 104 EAST TOWN STREET ALLEYWAY. MR. SCOTT, SIR. SO THIS PROPERTY IT IS UP BY JENNY LANE PARK. SO THERE WAS PREVIOUSLY A HOME THERE THAT WAS REMOVED. SO FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND PART OF THAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THE DEVELOPER PROPERTY OWNER ABOUT HAVING REAR LOADED DWELLING UNITS. AND SO RIGHT NOW IT'S PROPOSED TO BE THINKING THREE TOWNHOUSES AND A DUPLEX. SO FIVE UNITS, WHICH IS ALLOWED BY THE ZONING. AND THAT'S ALL GOOD. BUT GIVEN THE SPACING HAVING FRONT LOADED DRIVEWAYS IS CHALLENGING. SO WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THEM ON[01:00:04]
RELOADED DRIVES. BUT WE DO ALWAYS HAVE A CHALLENGE WITH OUR ALLEYS THAT A LOT OF OUR UTILITIES ARE THERE, ESPECIALLY THE OVERHEAD ELECTRICS. THOSE POLES, OUR STANDARD ALLEY REQUIREMENT IS 14FT WIDE AND THEN A SOME AMOUNT OF SUBBASE TO IT. IT'S NOT THE SAME AS A STREET STANDARD, BUT IT IS A LITTLE BIT BETTER THAN JUST THROWING ASPHALT ON THE DIRT.BUT IT DOES REQUIRE 14FT OF PAVEMENT. BUT GIVEN THE CONFLICTS WITH SOME OF THE POLES YOU MAY SEE IN YOUR BACKUP, OR IF YOU CAN SEE IT ON SCREEN, THERE'S A LITTLE JOG IN THAT ALLEY THERE. IT'S SORT OF SNAKING AROUND ONE OF THOSE TELEPHONE POLES, AND SO THEY'RE REQUESTING TO GO DOWN TO 12FT SO THEY CAN ACCOMMODATE THE PAVING THAT HELPS TO HAVE THEIR DWELLING UNITS RELOADED. AND THIS WILL GO FROM LEXINGTON TO. WHAT IS THIS STREET RIGHT HERE? BURNET TOWNS. YEAH. IT'S ON TOWNS. TOWNS IS TOWNS IS IN THE FRONT STREET. LEXINGTON IS RIGHT HERE TO. BECAUSE IT'S THE CORNER. IT'S THE CORNER HOUSE, CORRECT? YEAH. YES, YES. BUT IT WILL GO ALL THE WAY THROUGH PAVE, CORRECT? YES. AS YOU'RE SEEING IT HERE IT IS. OKAY.
PAVING ALL THE WAY THROUGH. YES. IS IT MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS WOULD BE CITY MAINTAINED? SO IF THAT'S THE CASE, IF THE UTILITIES IN IN QUESTION WERE TO BE RELOCATED, THAT THE PAVING COULD BE THEN EXPANDED OR WIDENED? YES. YEAH. WE DON'T HAVE A POLICY OR PROCEDURE RIGHT NOW THAT REQUIRES, YOU KNOW, PROPERTY OWNERS OR DEVELOPERS TO IMPROVE OUR ALLEY, THAT THEY HAVE TO BE THE ONES TO MAINTAIN IT. SO YES, IT WOULD BE. IT IS THE ALLEY IS OWNED BY THE CITY. SO RIGHT NOW IT IS MAINTAINED WOULD BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY. AND SO YES, WE COULD GO BACK IN IN THE FUTURE IF THE UTILITIES ARE RELOCATED, YOU KNOW, WE CAN INCREASE THE SIZE OF IT. IF WE FELT THAT WAS NECESSARY, COULD THIS PERHAPS EVEN REDUCE MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR THE CITY? YES, IT WOULD BE LESS PAVEMENT. SO THE 12 FOOT WORKS, AND MAYBE WE UPDATE OUR STANDARD IF IT'S FUNCTIONAL AND VERSUS THE WASHOUT OF THE CURRENT. THERE'S GRAVEL THERE RIGHT NOW. RIGHT. IT'S JUST NOT SURE. SOME ALLEYS THROUGHOUT TIME PEOPLE HAVE PUT DOWN SOME BASE AND ADDED SOME THINGS. SOME PEOPLE JUST DRIVE THROUGH IT AND IT JUST HAPPENS TO BE THE DIRT. YOU KNOW, GRASS AND BEING CITY MAINTAINED DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE'RE NECESSARILY LIKE ACTIVELY LIKE THEY'RE NOT PART OF THE STREET MAINTENANCE PLAN, NOT STREETS.
THEY GET MODE. OKAY. SO IF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AREN'T MAINTAINING IT MORE FREQUENTLY, THE CITY DOES HAVE THEM ON A SCHEDULE, SO THEY COME THROUGH A COUPLE TIMES A YEAR TO MOW THE ALLEYS. WE HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? NO MORE QUESTIONS. WE HAVE A MOTION FOR REGULAR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TEN. I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE. ITEM NUMBER TEN. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MEYER. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER STETSON. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES CONSIDERED. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON SUBDIVISION. FINAL PLAT FOR HOLLY SMITH. MUSTANG VALLEY PHASE TWO BEING ON 112 LOTS ON 28.614 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING GENERALLY LOCATED NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF VIRTUAL ARBOR LANE AND TROTTING MARE LANE MANOR, TEXAS. MR. SCOTT SO THIS PLOT, IT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY OUR ENGINEERS. SO WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. IT IS A NON-DISCRETIONARY ITEM, A SUBDIVISION, AND IT IS THE SECOND OF THREE PHASES FOR THE MUSTANG VALLEY SLASH HOLLY SMITH DEVELOPMENT UP THERE BY THE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL. SO WE HAVE TO ACCEPT THE STREET NAME AS PRESENTED. YES. THE CITY COUNCIL HAS A POLICY ON RENAMING STREETS IF THEY WANTED TO CAN INVESTIGATE THAT AFTER IT IS DEDICATED TO THE CITY.
THEY HAVE A PROCESS FOR THAT. OKAY. WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. COMMISSIONERS WHO CAME UP WITH GLORY GROTTO DRIVE, THE DEVELOPER DOES THAT. AND THEN THEY GET APPROVED BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN. THANK YOU. GLORY GROTTO DRIVE IS THE NAME OF THE STREET THAT WE'RE BEING. GLORY GROTTO. I'M SORRY. ANY MORE QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? ANY MORE QUESTIONS? DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR A REGULAR AGENDA ITEM? I RELUCTANTLY MOVE APPROVAL OF ITEM 11. I HAVE A
[01:05:06]
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER STETSON. DO I HAVE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NILA? ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES. I MOVED TO DO HAVE A MOTION FOR ADJOURNING THE MEETING AT 7:47 P.M. I MOVE THAT WE ADJOURN MOTION BY COMMISSIONER NILA. DO I SECOND? ALL IN FAVOR? POSE.* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.