Feb 11, 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission

[*The meeting has been joined in progress]

[CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM IS PRESENT ]

[00:00:08]

TOPIC NOT RELATED TO THE AGENDA TONIGHT FOR YELLOW CARDS. THOSE HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED HERE AND PRESENTED TO ME. THOSE SPEAKERS WILL BE ABLE TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA RELATED ON NON-AGENDA AND AGENDA RELATED ITEMS FOR A LENGTH OF TIME, NOT TO TOTAL FIVE MINUTES PER PERSON, AND THAT'S FOR ALL THE ITEMS THAT THEY'RE LISTED TO SPEAK FOR. AND THAT'S EXCEPT FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR THOSE ITEMS, YOU WILL BE ALLOWED TO HAVE UP TO TWO MINUTES WHEN THAT ITEM IS CALLED ON THE AGENDA. I WE WILL GET TO THE PUBLIC COMMENTS IN A MOMENT. I DO WANT TO AND THEN

[REGULAR AGENDA (Part 1 of 2)]

I DO WANT TO CALL THOUGH, IF WE CAN GO TO ITEM. THERE IT IS. ITEM FIVE CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE APPOINTMENT FOR THE CHAIR OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. I BELIEVE THIS IS FOR A ONE YEAR TERM THAT WILL EXPIRE AT THE END OF 2026, AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR A CHAIR, AND THEN WE'LL GO TO VICE CHAIR. GREAT.

COMMISSIONER MEYER. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPOINT MR. STINSON FOR CHAIR. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MEYER TO APPOINT COMMISSIONER STINSON AS CHAIR. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND. ANYONE WANT TO DISCUSS OR CONSIDER ADDITIONAL NOMINATIONS OR SUBSTITUTE NOMINATIONS? OKAY. HEARING NONE. THIS IS VERY ODD FOR ME. I'LL TAKE A VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPOINTING COMMISSIONER CHERRIES. COMMISSIONER STINSON AS CHAIR OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR 2026. PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED? THAT MOTION PASSES 5 TO 0. THANK YOU. OKAY, I HI. I'M YOUR CHAIR NOW. I WILL NOW TAKE NOMINATIONS OFF OF ITEM SIX. THIS IS CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE APPOINTMENT OF THE. IT'S LIKE IN REAL TIME OF THE VICE CHAIR OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. SAME TERMS APPLY. I'D LIKE TO SEE IF IT'S POSSIBLE TO NOMINATE MYSELF FOR VICE CHAIR. I BELIEVE. SO WOULD ANYONE. DO I HAVE A SECOND TO THE NOMINATION OF MR. NEIL AS VICE CHAIR? I'LL SECOND THAT. SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MENDOZA. I'M GOING TO TAKE SOME NOTES HERE. ALL RIGHT. ANY DISCUSSION TO THAT MOTION, ANY ALTERNATE NOMINATIONS OR VICE CHAIR? HEARING NONE AND SEEING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED? THE MOTION PASSES 5 TO 0. WELCOME, VICE CHAIR. ALSO VERY PUNCTUAL ON YOUR ATTENDANCE.

ALWAYS. IT'S BEEN NICE TO SEE YOU HERE LAST YEAR. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. ALL RIGHT.

COMMISSIONER NILA WILL BE. I'LL BE VICE CHAIR OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

COMMISSIONER STENSLAND IS NOW CHAIR OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR 2026. WHO IS THE MOTION MAKER? THAT WAS MEYER AND SECONDED BY ALBERT OH MENDOZA. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU ALL. THANK YOU ALL FOR ENTERTAINING US ON THAT. I WILL NOW GET BACK TO WE HAVE NO

[PUBLIC COMMENTS ]

ONCE YOU START SPEAKING, WOULD YOU ADDRESS US? THANK YOU SIR. AND JUST FOR FUTURE REFERENCE, NORMALLY PEOPLE RECUSE THEMSELVES FROM VOTING FOR THEMSELVES. OKAY, MR. NEIL HAS DONE SOME GOOD THINGS ON THIS BOARD, BUT HE'S ALSO THE HUSBAND OF ONE OF OUR COUNCIL MEMBERS. THE CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT ALL THE PEOPLE HAVE THEY CAN'T SERVE ON COMMITTEES IF THEY HAVE ONE DEGREE OF CONSANGUINITY. OKAY. I'M A LITTLE DISTURBED BECAUSE YOU GUYS STILL SEEM TO BE ACTING LIKE YOU'RE A COMMITTEE. ONE

[00:05:06]

THIS IS NOT A THREE HOURS, ONCE A MONTH JOB. YOU GUYS TOOK THIS JOB FOR A REASON. I WANT TO SEE YOU GUYS STEP UP TO THE PLATE AND START HELPING CONTROL OUR TOWN. WE'VE BEEN TAKEN OVER BY THE DEVELOPERS. ALL THESE CITY STAFF DOES IS SHOVEL MONEY AT DEVELOPERS. WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BE HAVING FOUR PLAZAS IN TOWN RIGHT NOW. DOES ANYONE REALLY THINK THAT PETE DWYER'S LAS ENTRADAS IS A BLIGHTED AREA DESERVING OF GOVERNMENT MONEY? I DON'T THINK SO. TIMMERMAN.

HE'S SUPPOSED TO PUT IN A PLAZA TO A PLAZA IS NOT A SHOPPING CENTER. PLAZA IS STATUES AND FOUNTAINS. IT'S A PLACE, A MEETING PLACE. EVERY GREAT CITY IN EUROPE HAS A PLAZA. EVERY LITTLE TOWN IN MEXICO HAS A PLAZA. MAYNARD. WE THINK IT'S A SHOPPING CENTER. THE MAYNARD DUMB GENE IS JUST RAMPANT. WE HAVE 100 MILLION BUCKS, AND YOU GUYS CAN'T EVEN GET A PING PONG TABLE FOR US. WELL, THAT'S WHERE THE PARK COMMITTEE. YOU GUYS NEED TO TAKE OVER, DO SOME TOWN HALLS. I MEAN, SERIOUSLY, WE'RE BEING PUMMELED BY A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT'S OBSOLETE. THE CITY MOVED THE QUOTE DOWNTOWN TO WHERE I SAID IT WAS ONLY A MILE SOUTH OF WHERE IT SHOULD BE. THAT'S THE NEW, QUOTE. TOWN CENTER. THEY NEED YOU NEED TO RESCIND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IT'S TOTAL BS. AND EVERYONE IN THIS ROOM KNOWS IT. IT'S FULL OF LIES.

IT'S 605 PAGES OF BLOATED BS. DO YOU REALLY THINK WE NEED TO GIVE MAYNARD DOWNS $8 MILLION TO COME DESTROY OUR LITTLE STADIUM AND PUT IN, LIKE, A LITTLE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK? AND THEY. AND YOU GUYS CALL THIS AN AMPHITHEATER? THIS IS WHAT THE CITY OF MAYNARD CALLS AN AMPHITHEATER. AND BY THE WAY, THIS DELFIN IS NOT PUTTING ANY MONEY INTO THAT AMPHITHEATER.

AND BY THE WAY, THEY NEVER WERE GOING TO DO ANYTHING FOR HILL LANE. THEY TOTALLY FED YOU A BUNCH OF BS ON THAT. I BELIEVE IT WAS MR. MYERS WHO SAID, COME BACK TO US WITH SOME OTHER PLANS TO THAT DON'T REQUIRE US CHOPPING DOWN THAT 29 INCH HERITAGE PECAN TREE. THEY NEVER DID. WHAT THEY DID IS THEY BAMBOOZLED SOME SUBDIVISION BUILDER INTO DOING THAT. THE TWO PARCELS SOUTH OF THERE, THEY TOTALLY FLUMMOXED YOU GUYS INTO SUBDIVIDING IT INTO SEVEN PARCELS. AND THEN THEY USED A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO JUSTIFY IT. WHY ARE WE GIVEN A $5 BILLION COMPANY? $8 MILLION? WE HAVE A MAYNARD COMMERCIAL PARK THAT'S OUT THERE TOWARD ELGIN.

THAT'S WHERE IT GOES. WE NOW THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT A SPORTS COMPLEX. WE HAVE ONE MAYNARD DOWNS. WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK THAT IS? IT WAS A HORSE RACE TRACK. IT SHOULD BE A SOCCER FIELD. CAN'T WE DO SOMETHING WITH THE STUFF WE HAVE OTHER THAN BULLDOZE IT DOWN? AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ONE THING TONIGHT. THE OWNER OF THIS BIG, UGLY BOX OVER HERE.

YOU GUYS LET THEM PUT AN UGLY, UGLY BOX. I CALL IT THE WART ON LEXINGTON. IN A HISTORIC DISTRICT, WE'VE HAD HISTORIC DISTRICT SINCE 2017. TWO OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE ON THERE WHEN THEY DID IT. MRS. AMESCUA AND A MISS EMILY HILL OR ANN. TWO OUT OF THOSE THREE, DID THEY FORGET WHY THEY VOTED FOR IT THEN? THE ONLY THING WE HAVE INTERESTING IN THIS TOWN IS OUR HISTORY. JAMES MAYNARD IS NOT EVEN MENTIONED ON THE WEB PAGE. GOSH, I'M JUST GETTING GOING. THANK YOU. YOU GUYS HAVE A VERY IMPORTANT. PARDON ME. YOU HAVE 38 SECONDS STILL. SORRY, SIR. 30S. YEAH. ALL RIGHT, WELL, LET ME LOOK AT MY NOTES HERE. THE AGENDA IS SCREWED UP. YOU GUYS NEED TO LEARN HOW TO DO AN AGENDA WHEN YOU DON'T PUT THE MINUTES ON HERE. THAT'S A VIOLATION OF THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT. THAT'S A MISDEMEANOR. CLASS C, I'VE GOT ABOUT FOUR AHEAD OF YOU WITH YOU GUYS, BUT THE CITY ATTORNEYS WILL NOT PUT THEM BEFORE THE COURT BECAUSE THE CITY ATTORNEYS, THEY THINK THEIR JOB IS TO PROTECT YOU GUYS. THEY THINK THEIR JOB IS TO DO A COVER UP OF EVERYTHING THAT THE CITY SECRETARIES DO NOT RELEASE. THEY WOULDN'T EVEN GIVE US THE GPR MAP THEY SPENT 32,000 ON. NOW THEY'RE FIGHTING WITH ME TO GET IT. THEY'RE FIGHTING WITH TEXAS AGS. I DON'T THINK YOU'RE GOING TO WIN THAT ONE, MR. BATTLE. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, AND I WILL. ALRIGHTY. WE ARE GOING TO

[PUBLIC HEARING ]

[00:10:03]

I'M READING FROM THE SLIDES INSTEAD OF THE AGENDA. DO I NEED TO DO A TCAD PARCEL? WE GOOD? ALRIGHTY. WITH THAT, I HAVE MR. BECAUSE YOU I KNOW NOW I MR. BATTLE YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES. THANK YOU SIR MY NAME IS ROBERT BATTLE. THIS IS A SITUATION WHERE I HAVE SOME KIND OF MIXED, CONTRADICTORY THINGS THAT ARE ALL GOOD AND ALL TRUE, AND IN FACT, YOU GUYS KIND OF REALLY BROUGHT THIS TO MY ATTENTION WITH THE MEDICAL THING DOWN HERE IN THE LOS ENTRADAS AREA, WHICH IS THESE PEOPLE DO NOT GENERATE HUGE AMOUNTS OF SALES TAXES. MAYBE WE DON'T WANT THEM ON THE FRONTAGE PART OF OF THE HIGHWAY. 290 SO DEFINITELY A CONSIDERATION. WE'LL SEE WHAT THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVES HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THAT. I WAS VERY CONCERNED BECAUSE I COULDN'T TELL FROM THE MAP WHERE THIS PARCEL WAS AT ALL.

SO IF PLANNING WOULD PUT LIKE A LARGER MAP SO WE CAN TELL WHERE IT IS, THAT WOULD BE GOOD. I WAS AFRAID IT WAS AT THE NORTH OR EXCUSE ME, THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THIS PARCEL, BECAUSE TIMMERMAN IS OVER TEN ACRES AND HE'S REQUIRED TO PUT IN A PLAZA. WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS GET ALL THESE PEOPLE COMPETING WITH EACH OTHER TO PUT IN AN OVER THE TOP FANTASTIC PLAZA. THAT'S HOW CITIES BECOME SOMETHING WORTH VISITING. OKAY, SO IN OTHER WORDS, I'M FOR AND AGAINST THIS. IN A WAY, I'M I'M TOTALLY FOR IT. BUT MAYBE BACK FURTHER FROM THE STREET. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MISS BATTLE. THAT IS ALL THE SPEAKERS WE HAVE ON ITEM ONE. COMMISSIONERS, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE OR KEEP OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. I MOVE TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING THE MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ALBERT TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM ONE.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MENDOZA? ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT? SEEING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED? THAT MOTION PASSES. ITEM TWO IS TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A SHORT FORM FINAL PLAT FOR A RESUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOTS 1112 LOTS, 11 TO PARDON ME, 11 TO 20. BLOCK 30 TOWN OF MANOR INTO ONE LOT ON 0.3048 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING LOCATED NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH LEXINGTON STREET AND EAST BOISE STREET IN MANOR. I HAVE MR. BATTLE. YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES. DO YOU MIND PULLING UP THAT SHOT? THE AERIAL VIEW. OKAY. YES. MY NAME IS ROBERT BATTLE. GOOD TO BE HERE TALKING WITH YOU. SEE THOSE GREEN BLOTCHES THERE? THOSE ARE WHAT I CALL TREES. TREES ARE WHAT WE WANT. PARKING LOTS. WE WANT AS FEW AS POSSIBLE. NOW, THE CATALYST COMMERCIAL DID A SECOND QUOTE DOWNTOWN PLAN. AND THEY REALLY LIKE INNER CITY SORT OF WALKWAYS. SO IN OTHER WORDS, I CAN WALK FROM MY HOUSE TO RIGHT HERE AND I DON'T HAVE TO BE ON THIS COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR THAT YOU CALL PARSONS. IT DOESN'T EVEN HAVE A SIDEWALK. OR I COULD GO IN THIS OTHER COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, LEXINGTON. IT DOESN'T EVEN HAVE A SIDEWALK. YOU GUYS CAN'T EVEN FIX THE SIDEWALK ACROSS THE STREET. PUTTING ASPHALT ON THIS PARKING LOT. MAYBE IN TEN YEARS. NOW WHAT? THIS REALLY IS A HE WANTS A PARKING LOT. HE DOESN'T HAVE TO JOIN THESE PARCELS TOGETHER TO DO A PARKING LOT. WHAT THIS IS, IS THIS IS HIS PRELUDE. THIS IS THE SAME GUY THAT BUILT THIS BIG, UGLY BOX ACROSS THE STREET. HE DOESN'T HAVE ENOUGH PARKING. WELL, THAT WAS PARTLY YOUR PROBLEM FOR APPROVING THAT WITHOUT ENOUGH PARKING. HE NEEDS TO SHARE IT WITH THOSE OTHER PEOPLE OVER THERE. THE BOYS BUNCH OF UGLY BOXES STARTED BY THE, YOU KNOW, SOUTH KOREAN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS TRUST WORTH 250 MILLION THAT COULDN'T CARE LESS ABOUT OUR TOWN. THIS IS A PRELUDE FOR HIM TO PUT A HIGH RISE THERE. THIS GUY, ERIC DAVIS, HE'S THE BLACK VERSION OF PETE DWYER. OKAY, SO HE GETS WHATEVER HE WANTS. THAT'S THE WAY IT WORKS IN MANOR. HE NEEDS TO BE STOPPED RIGHT NOW BECAUSE WE DO NOT WANT THIS GOSH DARN GIGANTIC, BLOATED VIEW OF DOWNTOWN. WE HAVE TO STOP IT. WE NEED TO KEEP THIS. WE NEED TO BUY THESE PARCELS FROM HIM. WE HAVE PLENTY OF MONEY. WE'VE GOT 100 MILLION BUCKS. WE NEED TO BUY THESE THREE PARCELS. THIS GUY ALSO, WHY ISN'T HE SHOWING US WHERE THE PARKING IS? HOW MANY TREES WILL BE LEFT WHEN HE GETS DONE? HE'S BASICALLY GOT THE PLANNING

[00:15:03]

THAT IS ALL THE SPEAKERS SIGNED UP ON ITEM THREE, AND THERE IS NO ONE SIGNED UP IN ADDITION TO IT. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MEYER TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND? SECOND BY. SHOULD I CALL YOU? I'LL CALL YOU VICE CHAIR. DEAL. ALL THE TIME. THAT'LL BE FUN. SECOND BY VICE CHAIR NILA. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? SEEING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED? THAT MOTION PASSES 5 TO 0. ALL RIGHT, THAT GETS US INTO OUR CONSENT AGENDA. THERE IS ONE ITEM ON THE

[CONSENT AGENDA ]

COMMISSIONERS, IF YOU HAD TIME TO REVIEW THE MINUTES. JUST NOW. PERFECT. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MEYER TO APPROVE A SECOND. SECOND. COMMISSIONER MENDOZA SECONDS. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OPPOSED. THAT MOTION PASSES 5 TO 0. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE

[REGULAR AGENDA (Part 2 of 2)]

[00:20:08]

AND ADDITIONALLY, YOU KNOW, THEY HAVE MET WITH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, SCOTT JONES, BECAUSE THERE ARE INCENTIVE AGREEMENTS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. AND THE DEVELOPER IS AWARE THAT, YOU KNOW, HAVING A PARCEL THAT DOESN'T GENERATE SALES TAX COULD LOWER THEIR REIMBURSEMENTS OR EXTEND THEIR TIME, BUT NOT PASS THE TERM OF THEIR AGREEMENT. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S A 20 YEAR TAX INCENTIVE AGREEMENT OR 25, BUT, YOU KNOW, IT COULDN'T EXTEND BEYOND THAT TIME FRAME WITHOUT COUNCIL APPROVAL. BUT THE DEVELOPER IS AWARE AND CONSENTS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IS AWARE. AND THEN FURTHER, YOU KNOW, LOOKING THROUGH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THIS AREA IS PLANNED TO BE COMMUNITY MIXED USE, WHICH INCLUDES, YOU KNOW, COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES. THIS ONE IS ALL COMMERCIAL. BUT WITHIN THAT, AND I BELIEVE THE THE DASHBOARD FOR COMMUNITY MIXED USE IS IN YOUR BACKUP. IT ISN'T 100% RETAIL, YOU KNOW, AS IT'S ENVISIONED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE THE NONRESIDENTIAL PORTION OF A COMMUNITY MIXED USE DISTRICT IS 50% RETAIL, 40% OFFICE AND 10% OTHER. SO THAT 10% OTHER COULD BE YOUR LIKE CIVIC USES OR OPEN SPACE TYPE USES. BUT THIS USE WOULD FALL INTO THAT 40%. THAT'S ENOUGH PERCENTAGES OF PERCENTAGES. 40% OF, YOU KNOW, THE 50% NONRESIDENTIAL WORKS OUT TO 20% OF THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. AND SO AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, WE'RE LOOKING AT ABOUT 6.3%. SO THEY STILL ARE IN LINE WITH WHAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENVISIONS.

AND AGAIN, ON THIS PAGE TWO ON THE DASHBOARD IT TALKS ABOUT THE THE COMMUNITY, MIXED USE SERVING RESIDENTS AND SPECIFICALLY CALLS OUT MEDICAL AND HEALTHCARE USES AS APPROPRIATE. SO AGAIN, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR THIS PARTICULAR USE. AGAIN, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM. AGAIN, THE APPLICANTS ARE HERE AS WELL. TO MR. DUNLOP, DID STAFF CONSIDER THE MICRO-HOSPITAL? THAT'S JUST WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY? I THINK IT'S WITHIN A MILE OF THIS, EVEN THOUGH IT'S NOT IN THE CITY OF MANER. FULL PURPOSE.

YES. YEAH, THEY'VE BEEN CONSIDERED. I MEAN, THE APPLICANTS, THEY PROPOSED THAT, YOU KNOW, THEIR USES A LITTLE FUNCTIONALLY DIFFERENT THAN THOSE TYPES OF ONES. SO THAT MAY BE A GOOD QUESTION FOR THEM ON THE SPECIFICS OF HOW THEY'RE DIFFERENT. BUT WE PRIMARILY LOOKED AT JUST THE OVERALL MIX OF THIS ONE PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT. YEAH WE DO HAVE LET'S SEE. SAINT DAVID'S RECENTLY OPENED. THERE'S THE ONE IN MAIN POINT OVER THERE BY

[00:25:01]

NOW WE HAVE THREE ON THE SAME CORNERS. WE ALSO WENT FROM HAVING ZERO. WE HAVE HAD ONE URGENT CARE. NOW WE HAVE AN URGENT CARE FREESTANDING A MICRO ON THE WAY. BUT I ALSO AM I LOOKING AT THIS AS LIKE IS THIS LIKE THE NEXT 12? FIRST WE HAD A SLEW OF I THINK WE HAD LIKE SIX SELF-STORAGE COME THROUGH. AND I KNOW WHEN WE LOOK AT THESE DEVELOPMENTS JUST WITHIN THEIR OWN ENTITY, WE DON'T LIKE LOOK AT THE NETWORK AND THEN WE END UP WITH, YOU KNOW, I'VE HEARD ME TALK ABOUT LIKE THE GAS STATION TEMPLATE WHERE YOU HAVE GAS STATION VICE, VICE NUMBER TWO. SO IT'S LIKE A VAPE SHOP, A LIQUOR STORE, SOME SORT OF LIKE NAUGHTY FOOD PLACE, YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? THERE'S NO SALAD PLACE AND THEN A DENTAL FACILITY OR SOME SORT OF MEDICAL FACILITY, LIKE THAT'S KIND OF OUR, OUR, OUR TEMPLATE THAT WE'VE DONE LIKE 3 OR 4 TIMES. SO I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT LIKE WHEN YOU'RE, WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT THESE REQUESTS, ARE YOU LOOKING AT IT BASED ON ALL FOUR CORNERS AND ALSO BASED OFF OF WHAT I TALKED ABOUT LAST MONTH? I DIDN'T MEAN TO BRAND THESE THIS WAY, BUT WE HAVE OUR GOLDEN ACRES AND WE HAVE OUR SILVER ACRES, OR IF YOU WANT TO CALL THEM, OUR PENNY ACRES, WHERE WE DON'T GET THE SALE LIKE THEY'RE NOT AS IDEAL FOR LIKE WE HAVE VERY FEW OF THE GOLDEN ACRES. SO I WANTED TO SEE THIS IS A GOLDEN ACRE, CORRECT? YES, YES. SO IT WOULD CAPTURE THE SALES TAX ON THIS PARCEL? YES. OKAY. YES. AND THEY WERE THE APPLICANT WAS MADE AWARE OF BECAUSE YOU ALL RECOMMENDED COUNCIL APPROVED TWO OTHER MEDICAL OFFICE MEDICAL CLINIC SPACES, ONE IN FRONT OF PRESIDENTIAL GLENN AND THEN ONE A LITTLE FURTHER EAST, I THINK CLOSER TO OLD KIMBROUGH.

BUT THOSE ARE. NOT NOT AS FAR ALONG. YEAH. AND, YOU KNOW, THEY LOOKED AT IT AND THE APPLICANT SAID THAT THOSE SITES DON'T SUIT THEIR NEEDS AND WHERE THEY NEED TO BE AND ON THEIR TIMELINES, I BELIEVE. BUT THEY WERE THOSE TWO OTHER LOCATIONS WEREN'T. MAYBE I WAS LIKE, YEAH. IN YOUR TERMINOLOGY, GOLDEN. COMMISSIONERS, DO YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR FOR THE APPLICANT? CAN YOU HELP ME OUT A LITTLE BIT ON LOCATION? SO THIS IS 290 OR 9973 IN FRONT OF GREENBERRY. OKAY. THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO MAKE SURE. OKAY. AND THIS DRIVEWAY HERE IS A FUTURE DRIVEWAY THAT WILL PUNCH THROUGH KIND OF MIDPOINT ABOUT WHAT IS WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT 200FT BACK FROM THE INTERSECTION, ROUGHLY MORE THAN THAT. OH, GOOD. OKAY, THAT'S ABOUT 500FT. I'M SO SORRY. YEAH, YEAH, THAT ENTIRE PARCEL IS 33 ACRES. OKAY. AND THIS WOULD BE KIND OF THE SECOND PARCEL IS THAT THE BLUE SQUARE? IS THAT IS THAT THE THE BUILDING ITSELF, OR IS THAT THE PARCEL WITH PARKING? THAT IS THE THE LOT BOUNDARY, THE PROPOSED LOT BOUNDARY THAT THEY WOULD THAT, THAT THIS WOULD BE APPLYING TOWARDS. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND SORRY. THE YELLOW IS THE NOTIFICATION THE 300 FOOT. SO ANY PROPERTY. SO IT WASN'T NOTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS DID YOU NOTIFY THE BIRDS IN THE SOUTH SIDE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IT'S SO CLOSE. COMMISSIONERS. IF NO QUESTIONS I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THIS SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. I HAVE A QUESTION. OF STAFF I GUESS. SO IF WE IF I'M CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG. MY UNDERSTANDING WAS THAT WE'RE UNDER THE 10%, LET'S SAY, OF MEDICAL USE. WHETHER THAT BE ARE WE COUNTING OFFICE, MEDICAL OFFICE AND THAT AS WELL. SO IF WE LET'S SAY, YOU KNOW, NEXT MONTH WE HAD ANOTHER LOT IN HERE. AND THAT PUSHED US OVER THE 10% ENVISIONED. THAT.

IS IT FAIR TO SAY THAT THAT IS NOT THAT IS NO LONGER IN LINE WITH WHAT WE WOULD HOPE FOR FOR THE PARCEL OR FOR THE LOT AS A WHOLE FOR MEDICAL USES? LET'S SAY YES, YES, STAFF, WE TAKE A LOT OF DIRECTION FROM YOU ALL IN COUNCIL. YOU KNOW, INTERNALLY WE KIND OF LOOK AT, YOU KNOW, SUPPORTING UP TO 10%. YOU KNOW, WE HEAR LIKE, HEY, THAT'S REALLY NOT REASONABLE.

LIKE DON'T EVEN GET THAT HIGH 6 TO 5. BUT. YOU'LL SEE LIKE AS, LIKE ALL OVER THE SHOPPING

[00:30:04]

RIGHT. IN ORDER TO HAVE A BALANCED COMMUNITY ATTRACTION. LIKE YOU'RE JUST IT'S UNREALISTIC ALMOST TO HAVE 100%. YEAH. I MEAN I SUPPORT LIKE THE MIXED USES. SO THERE'S YOU'RE BRINGING IN PEOPLE LIKE, YOU KNOW, FOR THE MEDICAL USE. WELL IN THIS CASE IT'S AN EMERGENCY CENTER. SO THEY'RE PROBABLY NOT CHOOSING TO REALLY WANT TO GO THERE. BUT OTHER ONES LIKE SALONS AND STUFF, THEY MIGHT BE MORE DESTINATIONS. AND YOU HAVE YOUR RETAIL THAT IS, YOU KNOW, MAYBE MORE IMPULSIVE PEOPLE ARE SHOPPING AND THEY GET YOUR RESTAURANTS IN THERE. SO HAVING THE RANGE OF USES BRINGS IN A RANGE OF PEOPLE AND RESIDENTS TO IT, AND THEN THEY CAN STAY LONGER AND MAYBE COMPLETE MORE OF THEIR DAILY TASKS AND NOT HAVE TO DRIVE AROUND AS MUCH.

YOU KNOW, THEY CAN DO EVERYTHING AT ONE CENTER. SO THAT'S WHY WE WOULD SUPPORT, YOU KNOW, A RANGE OF USES WITHIN THIS UP TO A LIMIT, BECAUSE WE SIX MONTHS AGO, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A 15 MILE DRIVE, RIGHT? YEAH. OKAY. AND. HOW DOES THIS DIFFER FROM THE MEDICAL FACILITY THAT WE CONSIDERED LAST MONTH? DO YOU WANT TO ADDRESS THAT? THE ONE LAST ONE, I BELIEVE IT WAS THE ACTION BEHAVIOR CENTER OVER IN LAS ENTRADAS. SO THAT. IS FUNCTIONALLY A DAYCARE. BUT FOR CHILDREN, I THINK THEY GO UP TO AGE EIGHT WHO HAVE ARE ON THE AUTISM SPECTRUM. SO IT'S A SPECIALIZED DAYCARE TYPE SERVICE. IT WAS BEING CLASSIFIED AS MEDICAL CLINIC, SORT OF REVISED THAT, YOU KNOW, WE'VE GOT CITY MANAGER ON THAT ONE, BUT THAT ONE WAS THIS IS A FREESTANDING EMERGENCY ROOM. THAT ONE WAS I GUESS MAYBE POTENTIALLY COULD HAVE SWITCHED. I MEAN, IT DEPENDS ON HOW YOU CONDITION THE APPROVAL, BUT THAT ONE WAS PLANNED TO BE A DAYCARE FOR CHILDREN WITH AUTISM. IS THERE ANY DIFFERENCE AS FAR AS THE 380 TAX? NO. BUT THE THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, WHO HANDLES THOSE? THEY WOULD MAYBE SET UP THE REIMBURSEMENTS AND TIMEFRAMES DIFFERENTLY, BUT IT JUST DEPENDS ON WHAT THEY'RE CONSIDERING AS REIMBURSABLE AND THE PERCENTAGES. THIS IS A MUCH SMALLER FACILITY THAN THE OTHER ONE THAT WAS BEING CONSIDERED. I THINK THE OTHER ONE WAS LIKE 13,000FT■!S. YEAH, IT WAS A LARR IT WAS LIKE A THIRD OF THE OF THE PARCEL. YEAH. SO LOTS OF WHERE THE OTHER ONE WAS PLANNED THAT DOES NOT HAVE A 380 TAX INCENTIVE AGREEMENT. THAT IS A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. SO THEY ARE RECEIVING FUNDS. THE DEVELOPER FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS THROUGH THERE. SO THERE ISN'T A 380 THERE. THERE IS A TRS BUT THAT ENCOMPASSES THIS PART OF DOWNTOWN AND IT EXTENDS OUT INTO THE LAS ENTRADAS AREA. SO THAT WAY ANY OF THE INCREASE IN TAX VALUE OR PERCENTAGE THAT IS CAPTURED TO BE REINVESTED BACK INTO THE DISTRICT AREA. YEAH.

SO THAT PREVIOUS ONE YOU CONSIDERED LAST WEEK, THAT ONE DID NOT HAVE A SALES TAX 380 TYPE AGREEMENT ON IT, BUT WE DID COLLECT SALES TAX THERE. SO THAT WAS THE CONSIDERATION. I BELIEVE WE HAVE THE APPLICANT OR AT LEAST THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE. RIGHT. I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT ACCESS, GIVEN THAT IT'S I'M IMAGINING YOU ALL ARE NOT GOING TO PURSUE A DIRECT DRIVEWAY WITH TEXDOT. SO IF I'M WRONG ABOUT THAT, WE CAN MAYBE TALK ABOUT THAT PIECE.

[00:35:06]

THANK YOU. WE ARE TOGETHER. AND ARE YOU SARAH CORONA? I'M NOT. I'M ELISE LOMBARDI. OH, HI.

SORRY, I'M JUST ASSIGNING NAMES OUT HERE TO PEOPLE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MISS STEVE. YES.

THANK YOU. ONE QUESTION, IF I MAY. SO WHY DON'T YOU? THERE ARE TWO ENTRANCES. I'M SORRY.

IS IT ONE ENTRANCE OR TWO ENTRANCES? I DIDN'T HEAR THAT PART. WELL, THERE WAS MULTIPLE ENTRANCES AND EXITS OFF OF THE LOT, BUT THERE'S ONE. THERE'S ONE MAIN CURB CUT. IT'S AN ACTUAL ROAD THAT GOES FROM 973 TO TO 90, BUT THE THE PARCEL ITSELF WILL HAVE MULTIPLE POINTS OF ACCESS. MR. DUNLOP, NOT TO YOU'VE GOT THREE COMMISSIONERS OVER HERE THAT ARE NERDS ABOUT TRANSPORTATION. THE THIS KIND OF THE LITTLE ROUNDABOUT. AND THEN IT GOES OVER THERE TO THE LEFT. IS THAT GOING TO ALIGN THAT NORTHERN THAT NORTHWESTERN DRIVEWAY, DOES THAT ALIGN TO THE THE HEB EXIT ENTRANCE THERE AT THE FRONT OF THEIR STORE, OR DOES THAT ALIGN TO THE MAINER CROSSING INTERSECTION THAT'S SIGNALIZED ALREADY? THE SIGNALIZED MANNER CONFERENCE BOULEVARD? WE LIKE THAT WORD. OKAY. AND THEN THIS WOULD BE ALSO PROBABLY A SIGNALIZED OR AT LEAST A RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT. OH, I SEE A I SEE A LEFT TURN LANE. CORRECT. THAT'S A LEFT TURN LANE IN THE CUT TO GO EAST TO NORTH. THERE. THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY CROSSOVER. SO IF YOU'RE HEADING EASTBOUND ON 290 YOU HAVE TO TURN LIKE AT GREENBERRY YOU TURN, YOU'D GO INTO, YOU'D GO IN THROUGH GREENBERRY AND THEN COME IN THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT THAT WAY. YES. OKAY. THANK YOU. YEAH. THAT'S A AND THIS IS BASED OFF THE CURRENT YOU KNOW THAT TXDOT IS OUR FRIEND AND THEY THEY HAVE THOUGHTS FOR 290. YES OF COURSE HAS A SITE PLAN. THIS IS IRRELEVANT TO THIS QUESTION PROBABLY. NOPE. NEVER MIND. I WAS ASKED ABOUT THE COORDINATED SITE PLAN FOR THIS. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THE BLADE OR NOT, BUT WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT LATER. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL KEEP IT FOCUSED ON THE PERMIT. THANK YOU. YEAH. THANK YOU SO MUCH. COMMISSIONERS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR EMOTION? I'LL ENTERTAIN IT, MR. MENDOZA. I PROPOSE A MOTION. ALL RIGHT. TO LET ME JUST CLOSE THE. OH, WE'RE ALREADY CLOSED. SO NOW WE WILL TAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE, DENY OR POSTPONE. DECISION ON THE TO EITHER. SO WE'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE OR DENY OR POSTPONE THIS ITEM. THIS ITEM.

I GUESS I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MENDOZA TO APPROVE THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR MEDICAL CLINIC ON ITEM SEVEN. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS MOTION? ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT. THAT IS THREE. TWO. DOES THAT PASS? BECAUSE IT'S BASED ON THOSE PRESENT MEMBERS VOTING PRESENT. SO THAT PASSES. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT I'M LIKE IT'S QUORUM NOT NOT OF ALL VESTED HUMANS THAT ARE PART OF THE COMMISSION. THANK YOU SO MUCH. APPLICANT. ALL RIGHT. ITEM EIGHT. SO THAT PASSES ON A VOTE OF 3 TO 2. THANK YOU SO MUCH. ITEM EIGHT IS CONSIDERATION DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION

[00:40:04]

OH SORRY. MAYBE I'LL PLAY A BIT MORE. THEY WILL BE USING THE ALLEY AND IMPROVING THE CITY'S ALLEY. SO THAT WILL BE THE ACCESS OFF LEXINGTON AND BURNET. AND THEN THAT LITTLE PORTION THAT POKES OUT ON THE STREET THAT IS ALSO AN EXIT. THEY'RE NEXT TO THAT LITTLE STRIP RETAIL THAT'S THERE. SO THEY'LL HAVE THREE POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS INTO THIS PROPERTY.

MR. DUNLOP, I READ THE CONFORMANCE LETTER FROM THE ENGINEER, BUT I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT IS THIS GOING TO BE USED FOR OFFSETTING PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR DOWNTOWN BUSINESS THAT EXIST OR NO, THEIR DOWNTOWN BUSINESS? I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW WE'RE PAVING PARADISE. LIKE I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW WE'RE PAVING HALF A BLOCK. SO YEAH, THIS ISN'T BEING USED TO OFFSET ANY PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT. THE DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE STREET MET THEIR PARKING STANDARDS. THEY, YOU KNOW, THEY HAVE RETAIL ON THE BOTTOM THAT MAY WANT ADDITIONAL PARKING THAT THEY COULDN'T ACCOMMODATE ON SITE. BUT THAT BUILDING ACROSS THE STREET MET THEIR MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKING. AND SO THERE'S AGAIN, THIS IS A USE THAT IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICT. SO THEY'RE ABLE TO DO IT BY RIGHT. YES. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE GOING TO BE A JOINT AGREEMENT OR FOR USE OF THIS PARKING LOT IF IT'S BUILT. NO. SO WE DON'T HAVE ANY REQUIREMENTS. AND I CAN'T THINK OF ANYTHING RIGHT NOW THAT MAYBE WOULD CAUSE THE CITY TO, YOU KNOW, CAUSE CREATE THAT WHERE WE COULD HAVE JOINT AGREEMENTS WITH THE DEVELOPER FOR THIS. SO IT'LL STILL BE A PRIVATE LOT. TECHNICALLY, YES. OKAY. AND COMMISSIONERS, AS YOU HEARD STAFF SAY, THIS IS A NON-DISCRETIONARY ITEM. SO THIS IS APPROVE OR DENY WITH DIRECTION. YEAH, YEAH. DENY WITH CONDITIONS. I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE. AGENDA ITEM EIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION BY VICE CHAIR NEELY TO APPROVE ITEM EIGHT. DO I HAVE A SECOND? CALLING FOR A SECOND TO APPROVE ITEM EIGHT.

ONE MORE CALL FOR A SECOND ON ITEM EIGHT TO APPROVE. HEARING NONE. THAT MOTION FAILS. THAT MOTION DOES NOT THE MOTION. THERE'S NO FAILING OF THE MOTION. BUT THAT MOTION JUST IS NOT SECONDED. AND CITY ATTORNEY, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY VERONICA. GOOD EVENING.

COMMISSIONERS, CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS VERONICA RIVERA, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ON

[00:45:01]

WELL, THERE'S ALSO A SHOT CLOCK ON THIS RIGHT. SO NO ACTION RESULTS IN AUTOMATIC APPROVAL.

CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT SIR OKAY. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE COMMISSIONERS. ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE FOR THE DEVELOPER IN THIS? I DO NOT HAVE ANYONE HERE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON FROM M.W.M DESIGN GROUP. THERE IS SARAH. YOU CALLED HER UP BEFORE. COME ON UP. HELLO. THROW YOUR HANDS IN THE AIR FOR US. DO YOU MIND STATING YOUR NAME? SURE. I'M SARAH CRONA WITH M.W.M. I FOUND YOU ON MY LIST. THANK YOU, MISS CARONA. SORRY ABOUT THAT. CAN YOU? YEAH. CAN YOU WALK US THROUGH WHAT Y'ALL ARE ENVISIONING FOR THE SITE? I KNOW WE'RE TALKING PARKING LOT. I'M NOT SEEING SORT OF WHAT THE NEED IS, BUT I'M ALSO WOULD LIKE TO BE WOULD LIKE TO UNDERSTAND MAYBE WHAT THE NEED IS. YEAH, AS FAR AS I KNOW IT IS. IT IS FOR A PARKING LOT. I THINK IT'S MEANT TO HELP THE SURROUNDING BUSINESSES. I'M CONCERNED FOR A PRIVATE USE PARKING LOT THAT SUPPOSEDLY WOULD HELP THE LOCAL BUSINESSES, BUT WHERE THE BUSINESSES HAVE NO ACTUAL LEGAL RIGHT TO USE IT. SO IF I WAS LOOKING AT MORE OF A PUBLIC USE OR COMMUNITY USE, I'D BE MORE IN FAVOR. AND PLUS. IT'S LOADED WITH TREES. SO I'VE GOT TWO ITEMS THERE THAT THAT BOTHERS ME ABOUT THIS. SO THAT'S MY OBJECTION. MY CONCERN IS ALSO THE TREES. I KNOW IT WAS BROUGHT UP SOMETHING ALONG THE LINES THAT THERE WOULD BE SOME REPLANTING OF THE TREES AT LIKE AS MANY AS POSSIBLE. BUT WHAT EXACTLY WOULD THAT END UP MEANING? BECAUSE I DEFINITELY SEE AT LEAST LIKE 1015 TREES HERE. WOULD IT JUST BE LIKE A COUPLE, OR WOULD IT DEFINITELY TRY TO GET BACK TO THE NUMBER THAT WAS ALREADY EXISTING, OR IS THERE A PLAN FOR THAT? I BELIEVE THEY ARE PURSUING THE FEE IN LIEU FOR THE REPLANTING.

CAN STAFF REMIND US WHAT A FEE IN LIEU ENTAILS AND THEN WHAT? WHAT HAPPENS WITH THE MONEY FOR A FEE IN LIEU? PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION? MY NAME IS MICHAEL. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR FOR THE CITY OF MAINER. THIS IS PROBABLY NOT WHAT YOU WANT TO HEAR, BUT THE QUESTIONS YOU ARE ASKING PERTAIN MORE TO SITE PLAN THAN THE PLAT, SO THEY WOULD NOT HOLD RELEVANCE TO THIS SPECIFIC ITEM. I CAN SPEAK SOMEWHAT TO THE OTHER QUESTION PERTAINING TO THE ACTUAL USE OF THE PARKING LOT. THE INTENT, FROM MY UNDERSTANDING WITH THE CONVERSATION WITH THE DEVELOPER, IS TO ENTER INTO PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS WITH THE SURROUNDING BUSINESSES SO THAT SHARED COST IS THERE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE LOT. BUT THAT'S ABOUT THE EXTENT OF MY KNOWLEDGE AS WE HAVE NOT REACHED APPROVAL OF EVERYTHING YET. BUT THAT ALSO ASIDE, NOT RELATED TO THE ACTUAL PLAT. THANK YOU, MR. MORELLE. COMMISSIONERS, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YES. CAN WE GET A LITTLE BIT OF A RUNDOWN ON WHAT HAPPENS WITH FEE IN LIEU PAYMENTS FOR TREES, A LITTLE BIT OF A REFRESHER ON WHAT WHAT THAT GOES TOWARDS.

AND ONE ON ONE. YEAH. SO IT'S AUTHORIZED BY CITY COUNCIL. AND SO THEY DETERMINE THE FEE AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. SO THEY JUST DID ONE AT THEIR LAST MEETING AND THEY AUTHORIZED $200 PER CALIPER INCH FOR THAT PARTICULAR PROJECT. AND SO THE WAY IT WORKS, YOU KNOW, EVEN THROUGH THE PLANNING PROCESS, THEY'LL DO TREE SURVEYS AND THEY'LL IDENTIFY THEY'RE PROTECTED. AND HERITAGE TREES, HERITAGE TREES OBVIOUSLY COME TO YOU ALL FOR AUTHORIZATION TO BE REMOVED. AND THEN IF THERE'S ANY MITIGATION THAT WOULD THEN GO ON TO CITY COUNCIL. BUT THEY'LL DO THEIR TREE SURVEYS AND IDENTIFY THE AMOUNT OF CALIPER INCHES, WHAT TREES ARE

[00:50:04]

OR MAYBE IN THIS IN THIS CASE, THERE'S A HIGHER MITIGATION RATE. THEN THEY'LL SAY, HEY, YOU KNOW, WE CAN'T ACCOMMODATE ALL THIS ON THIS, THE PROPERTY. AND SO OUR CODE ALLOWS FOR THEM TO EITHER JUST GO PLANT TREES ON CITY PROPERTY, OR THEY CAN REQUEST A FEE IN LIEU OR A COMBINATION OF THOSE TWO THINGS. AND SO THIS ONE, THEY'VE AS I SAID, THEY'VE DESIGNED IT TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH OUR PARKING STANDARDS IN TERMS OF END ISLANDS AND LANDSCAPING. AND IT DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIRED MITIGATION FOR THE AMOUNT OF CALIPER INCHES THEY'RE REMOVING.

SO THEN THAT DIFFERENCE IS WHAT IS GOING TO WOULD BE GOING TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR APPROVAL, THEIR DETERMINATION ON A FEE AND APPROVAL. AND THEN IF IT'S APPROVED BEFORE WE ISSUE THEIR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, SO THEY CAN'T DO ANYTHING UNTIL THEY PAY THAT. SO WE'LL ASSESS THEM. THE RATE THAT COUNCIL DETERMINES AND THAT GOES INTO A TREE FUND THAT'S SEPARATE. AND THAT IS USED ONLY FOR THE CITY TO PLANT AND MAINTAIN TREES ON CITY PROPERTY. SO IN OUR PARKS RIGHTS OF WAY HERE, CITY HALL PROPERTIES. SO WE CAN USE IT TO THOSE ENDS FOR TREE PLANTING AND MAINTENANCE. THANK YOU. AND THIS WAS A GERMANE CONVERSATION BECAUSE STAFF INTRODUCED THE FEE IN LIEU. SO I ALLOWED THAT TO CONTINUE. SO THANK YOU. SORRY, MR. BURRELL IF WE DON'T WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT, DON'T TALK ABOUT IT. AND THEN WE WON'T TALK ABOUT IT. STAFF COMMISSIONERS, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR THE APPLICANT TO HAVE A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS EXPECTED OF COMMISSIONERS ON ITEM EIGHT? I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH OBJECTION TO THE USE AS A PARKING LOT. NO, I'M NOT SURE IF I'M ABLE TO HAVE THAT. THAT'S THE MOTION IS EITHER ALLOWED TO BE APPROVED, DENY OR DENY, APPROVE OR DENY WITH CONDITIONS CORRECT. IT'S AN ACCEPTANCE OF THE. IT'S AN ACCEPTANCE OF THE CONFORMANCE LETTER AND THE FINAL PLAT.

CORRECT. COMMISSIONER MEYER VERONICA RIVERA, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY, WITH REGARD TO THE MOTION THAT YOU JUST MADE, YOU ARE ACTUALLY PROVIDING INFORMATION ON ZONING BECAUSE YOU'RE YOU'RE DISCUSSING THE USE OR IN YOUR MOTION. AND AT THIS TIME, IT IS ONLY THE SUBDIVISION THAT IS BEING CONSIDERED AND NOT ANY OF THE USES. SO IF YOU'D LIKE TO PROVIDE ANOTHER MOTION, BUT AT THIS TIME, THAT IS THAT MOTION I CAN'T ACCEPT BECAUSE IT IS NOT WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF THE METES AND BOUNDS OF THE OF WHAT'S ALLOWED, BECAUSE IT'S NOT A ZONING CASE AT THIS TIME. IT'S SUBDIVISION APPLICATION. I WITHDRAW MY MOTION. ALL RIGHT.

I'M LOOKING TO THE LEFT SIDE OF THE DAIS. I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE. ITEM EIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER OBERT TO APPROVE ITEM EIGHT. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. SECOND. BY COMMISSIONER NILA, DO YOU HAVE ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS NON-DISCRETIONARY ITEM? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED? PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. THE MOTION PASSES 3 TO 2. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. AND THANK YOU FOR SUBMITTING YOUR CARD. OUR FINAL ITEM OF THE EVENING IS ITEM NINE, CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A SHORT TERM, SHORT FORM FINAL PLAT OF A REPLAT OF LOT 45, BLOCK K, PHASE THREE LARGO SUBDIVISION BEING THREE LOTS ON 6.321 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS, AND BEING LOCATED NEAR 17075 AND A HALF BLAKE MANOR ROAD, MANOR, TEXAS. SORRY I KEEP GETTING A DRY MOUTH EVERY TIME I SEE THIS ADDRESS. THIS IS ALSO NON-DISCRETIONARY ITEM STAFF. PLEASE EXPLAIN. SO THIS WAS

[00:55:02]

SECOND. SECOND. NILA, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. THAT MOTION PASSES. WE ARE NOW ADJOURNED AT

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.