1. Conduct a public hearing on a Specific Use Permit for 15,000 square feet of Professional Office, Medical Office, and Medical Clinic, one (1) lot on 3.11 acres, more or less, being located at 13801 N FM 973, Manor, TX.

[1. Conduct a public hearing on a Specific Use Permit for 15,000 square feet of Professional Office, Medical Office, and Medical Clinic, one (1) lot on 3.11 acres, more or less, being located at 13801 N FM 973, Manor, TX.]

[00:15:36]

ALL RIGHT. COUNCIL, WE HAVE A SERIES OF PUBLIC HEARINGS. WE'RE GOING TO START OFF WITH, NUMBER ONE, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR 15,000FT■!S OF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE, MEDICAL OFFICE AND MEDICAL CLINIC, ONE LOT ON 3.17 ACRES MORE OR LESS, BEING LOCATED AT 13801 NORTH FM 973 MAYNARD, TEXAS. IS YOU? YEAH.

COME ON UP, MR. DOT. EVENING, MAYOR. COUNCIL. THIS ITEM, I CAN GO INTO IT. BUT ALSO LAST MEETING, THERE WAS NO QUORUM, SO THEY DIDN'T TAKE IT UP. SO WE'D ACTUALLY BE ASKING YOU TO POSTPONE THIS OR KEEP OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND KEEP IT OPEN TO YOUR MAY 20TH MEETING. SO PLANNING COMMISSION CAN CONSIDER IT AND BRING YOUR RECOMMENDATION. OKAY. NEED THAT MOTION. WHAT'S THE DATE? MAY 20TH, MAY 22ND MEETING IN MAY. MAYOR. MAYOR, COUNCIL. WE'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL LEAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN UNTIL MAY 20TH, 2026. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HAVE MOTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN. WHERE IS THERE A SECOND? A SECOND. SECOND BY COUNCILWOMAN MASSAQUOI. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION BEING NONE. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. NUMBER TWO, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING

[2. Conduct a public hearing on a Subdivision Concept Plan for Kimbro Crossing being seventeen (17) lots on 52.69 acres, more or less, and being TCAD parcel 236951 also known as 14018 E US 290 HWY, Manor, TX.]

ON A SUBDIVISION CONCEPT PLAN FOR KIMBALL CROSSING. BEING 17 LOTS ON 52.69 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING DEKALB PARCEL 236951, ALSO KNOWN AS 14018 EAST US 290 HIGHWAY. MAYNARD, TEXAS. MR. ROBERT AND YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES, SIR. THANK YOU SIR. ONCE AGAIN, I WOULD NOTE TO THE ATTORNEYS AND APPLICANTS. TIMMERMANS LAST NAME HAS TWO ENDS. IT'S TIMMERMAN WITH TWO ENDS. THIS CRACKS ME UP. THEIR OWN ATTORNEYS DON'T KNOW HOW TO SPELL THEIR NAME OR THE APPLICANT'S. NOW, I HAVE A QUESTION ALSO THAT APPLIES TO THIS LAST ONE. I'M ONLY LEARNING ABOUT SOMETHING NOW CALLED THE SHOT CLOCK. THIS IS SOMETHING OUR CITY STAFF KNOWS EXACTLY ABOUT, BUT THEY'VE MANAGED TO KEEP IT HIDDEN FROM ME FOR LIKE SIX YEARS. CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT? IT'S HARD TO BELIEVE I LEARNED ABOUT IT BECAUSE THE LAST PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DIDN'T EVEN GET GAVELED DOWN. IT DIDN'T EVEN HAPPEN. SO BY THAT, NEVER HAPPENING, JUST LIKE BY YOU POSTPONING THIS MEETING, DOES THAT MEAN THAT THESE DEVELOPERS HAVE NOW GONE TO ELIMINATE ALMOST ALL OF THAT SHOT CLOCK BY SIMPLY YOUR INACTION? THAT WOULD BE MY QUESTION. THAT'S SOMETHING WE REALLY NEED TO UNDERSTAND HERE AS CITIZENS. SPEAKING OF WHICH, THIS IS A 52.69 ACRE DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS NOT THIS IS ABOUT 17 ACRES OF IT. I THINK THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT IS OVER TEN ACRES, AS IS THIS PORTION. THEREFORE, IT'S REQUIRED IN OUR CODES THAT THEY HAVE A PLAZA. NOW, I'M STILL TRYING TO TEACH YOU PEOPLE WHAT A PLAZA IS. YOU THINK A PLAZA IS A SHOPPING CENTER BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO IDEA. THERE'S BEAUTIFUL CITIES IN EUROPE CALLED ROME AND PARIS. THERE'S ALSO EVERY LITTLE VILLAGE IN MEXICO. THEY HAVE A PLAZA. THAT'S WHERE THE FOUNTAINS ARE.

THAT'S WHERE THE STATUES ARE. THAT'S WHERE PEOPLE COME OUT AND THEY TALK TO ONE ANOTHER LIKE, DARE I SAY IT, A COMMUNITY. WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO START HOLDING UP YOUR END TO DO SOMETHING FOR THE COMMUNITY? WE HAVE ABOUT SIX SHOPPING CENTERS NOW THAT EVERY SINGLE ONE OWES US A PLAZA. HOW MANY OF YOU HELD UP TO THE FEET TO THE FIRE? ZERO. THANK YOU.

MESSED IT ALL UP. SO THIS THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CONCEPT PLAN FOR KIMBALL CROSSING. IT'S OVER THERE AT OLD KIMBRO AND 290. SO IT'S A 17 LOTS. THERE'S 14 COMMERCIAL

[00:20:04]

LOTS. THERE'S ONE RESIDENTIAL LOT THAT YOU'LL BE GETTING A ZONING CASE ON IN THE FUTURE, BUT IS CURRENTLY ZONED COMMERCIAL. BUT THERE'S INTENTION CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL IN THE BACK. THIS IS WHERE HOBBY LOBBY AND ACADEMY ARE PROPOSED TO GO. THERE WAS A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, 380 AGREEMENT FOR THIS. THERE WAS NOT A, YOU KNOW, QUORUM AT THE LAST PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. SO THEY DID NOT HAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING OR TAKE ACTION ON IT. BUT PER THE CITY'S CODE, IN ORDER TO MEET THE STATE'S REQUIREMENTS FOR ACTION TO BE TAKEN ON PLATS AND PLANS, OUR CODE ALLOWS WHEN THERE'S A LACK OF A QUORUM FOR ITEMS THAT ARE RECOMMENDED TO BE APPROVED BY STAFF TO BE APPROVED, AND ITEMS TO BE DENIED TO BE DENIED. SO THAT IS THE ACTIONS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION TOOK. AND SO THIS ITEM WAS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AT THE LAST PLANNING COMMISSION. SO UNDER OUR CODE, IT COMES TO YOU AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. AND WHEN YOU GET TO THE ACTION ITEM ON IT, IT HAS MET CITY REQUIREMENTS THAT WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. THANK YOU SIR. QUESTIONS? HAVE YOU RECEIVED ANY COMMENTS OR ANYTHING FROM ANYONE THAT'S IN THE AREA THAT YOU HAD TO REACH OUT TO? NO. OKAY. AND THEN I'VE BEEN AWARE OF. SCOTT, CAN YOU SPEAK A LITTLE BIT TO THE DECELERATION LANE? THAT'S ABOUT THE LENGTH AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND EVERYTHING FOR THAT. SO THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE WORKING WITH WITH TXDOT. SO MOST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE ON 290.

THERE'S A RIGHT TURN LANE THAT'S PROPOSED FOR KIMBROUGH THAT TXDOT RECOMMENDED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THERE, A FULL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WAS WAIVED. AS LONG AS THEY PROVIDE CERTAIN MITIGATIONS. AND THOSE WERE WORKED WITH WITH TXDOT. SO THAT'S WHAT YOU SEE IN YOUR BACKUP THERE. THOSE REQUIRED MITIGATIONS IN LIEU OF A FULL TIA. AND SO TXDOT KNOWING THEIR FACILITY AND YOU KNOW, THE TRAFFIC THAT THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT COULD GENERATE, YOU KNOW, THEY SAID, HEY, YOU NEED A DECEL LANE OF, I DON'T KNOW, NUMBERS OFF TOP OF MY HEAD, 450FT, 600FT, WHATEVER IT MAY BE, PER THEIR STANDARDS. AND THE DRIVE WAY, THE TALK ABOUT THE DRIVEWAY THAT WOULD NEED TO BE SHIFTED. IS THAT GOING TO BE A AN ISSUE? I READ SOMEWHERE IN THERE THAT THE DRIVEWAY WOULD NEED TO BE SHIFTED TO THE WEST TO ACCOMMODATE THAT FULL DECELERATION LANE. THAT'S, YOU KNOW, THEY PROBABLY WORK WITH TXDOT TO SAY, HERE'S OUR PROPOSED PLAN. AND TXDOT SAID TO SHIFT ONE OF THEIR DRIVEWAYS AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE, YOU CAN TALK TO THEM TOO. IF THAT WAS, YOU KNOW, PART OF THIS PARTICULAR PLAN, THEY DO SHOW CERTAIN PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS ON THIS CONCEPT PLAN, WHEN REALLY THE CONCEPT PLAN FOR WHAT THE PORTIONS OF THE CITY REVIEWS ARE FUTURE PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE, YOUR LOTS, YOUR PHASING, THE AMOUNT OF UTILITY DEMAND. SO THIS CONCEPT PLAN SHOWING BUILDING LAYOUTS, PARKING DRIVES THAT ACTUALLY COMES LATER IN THE PROCESS. SO.

DID YOU WANT TO ASK, DID YOU WANT TO ASK YOUR QUESTION TO THEM OR YOU GOT THAT? THAT WAS MY, THAT WAS MY OKAY. YEAH, SURE. THIS IS TRUE. JUST JUST INTRODUCE YOURSELF AND THEN YOU WANT TO ASK THE QUESTION AGAIN. HELLO, I'M DREW GUTHRIE, I'M WITH BARON STARK ENGINEERS.

WE'RE THE CIVIL ENGINEERING FIRM REPRESENTING THIS DEVELOPMENT. TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, THE DECELERATION LENGTH ON 290 IS 750FT FOR BOTH TURNING ONTO OLD KIMBROUGH AND TURNING INTO THE DEVELOPMENT. IF YOU FLIP TO THE PREVIOUS SCREEN, YOU CAN SEE WHERE THE THAT DRIVEWAY IS, IS WAS SHIFTED TO THE WEST JUST TO ACCOUNT FOR THAT 750FT REQUIRED BY TXDOT. GOT IT. OKAY. THANK YOU. THAT ANSWERS MY QUESTION. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COUNCIL MEMBERS? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I'LL TAKE A MOTION OR ANOTHER QUESTION. MAYOR.

COUNCIL, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A SUBDIVISION CONCEPT PLAN FOR KIMBROUGH CROSSING BEING 17 LOTS ON 52.69 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING T A C D PARCEL 236951, ALSO KNOWN AS 14018. EAST US EAST US 290 HIGHWAY. ARE YOU MAKING. OKAY? SHOULD WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? WE HAVE A MOTION ON

[00:25:07]

THE FLOOR BY COUNCILWOMAN WARE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE A SECOND I SECOND SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM HILL. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION BEING NONE. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED?

[3. Conduct a public hearing on a Specific Use Permit for 5,725 square feet of Medical Office, one (1) lot on 6.76 acres, more or less, and being Las Entradas North, also known as 12420 Tillgang Pass, Manor, TX.]

MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. NUMBER THREE. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR 5725FT■!S OF MEDICAL OFFICE ON ONE LOT ON 6.76 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING LAWSON TROTTER'S NORTH, ALSO KNOWN AS 12420 TILL GAME PASS. MAYNARD, TEXAS. MR. ROBERT, YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. MY NAME IS ROBERT BATTLE. THIS IS PART OF LAS ENTRADAS, WHICH IS A DEVELOPMENT OWNED BY, WELL, MR. DWYER AND SOME OF HIS. IT'S AN LLC, I THINK, OR AN INCORPORATION OR SOMETHING OR OTHER, BUT IT ALSO HAS THE PROPERTY THAT THE HOMESTEAD IS ON, THE LITTLE SHACK THAT'S OUR JAMES MANOR HOMESTEAD, ALSO ALAMO. THERE'S OTHER PARTS OF TONIGHT'S STUFF WHERE IT SEEMED LIKE YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT EMINENT DOMAIN. WE NEED TO EMINENT DOMAIN THE HOMESTEAD, BUT NOW PART OF THAT LOS ENTRADAS AS IT GOES NORTH. FOR ONE THING, FOR SOME UNKNOWN REASON, IT'S PART OF A TOURS. YOU GUYS PUT IT INTO YOUR TOURS.

NUMBER TWO TOURS IS FOR BLIGHTED THINGS. YOU'RE THE TOURS COMMITTEE, THE BOARD, AND YOU REPORT TO YOURSELVES. THAT'S A NO NO TO. BUT HERE WE ARE AGAIN. I ASKED PETE DWYER WHEN I FIRST LEARNED ABOUT PLAZAS. I WAS AT A CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING. I SAID, LOOK AT THIS, PETE. TEN ACRE COMMERCIAL HAS TO HAVE A PLAZA. HE LOOKED AT ME AND HE SAID, WHAT'S A PLAZA? I'M NOT KIDDING. NOW I LIKE PETE. I GIVE HIM A LOT OF HARD TIMES AND STUFF, BUT HE'S DONE A LOT OF GOOD THINGS FOR OUR COMMUNITY. BUT HE'S ALSO KIND OF MISSING THE BOAT ON A FEW. AND UNFORTUNATELY, WHERE'S THE PLAZA, PETE? ALL THESE RICH PEOPLE ARE SUCH CHEAP TIGHTWADS. IT'S REALLY HARD TO IMAGINE. IN FACT, DID YOU KNOW THAT I'M THE LARGEST PARKS DONOR OF ANYONE IN TOWN? I'VE GIVEN MORE MONEY THAN ALL 30,000 MANOR PEOPLE, AND IT'S UNDER 1500 BUCKS. THAT'S WHAT A CHEAP TOWN WE HAVE. SO CAN WE GET A PLAZA ON THIS DEVELOPMENT, PLEASE? THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. ARE YOU ASKING US TO LEAVE THIS ONE OPEN? YES, SIR. THE SAME AS NUMBER ONE TO THE MAY 20TH MEETING, PLEASE. OKAY. MAYOR.

COUNCIL, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE LEAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN UNTIL THE MAY 20TH, 2026 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MORENO. IS THERE A SECOND I SECOND? SECOND BY COUNCILWOMAN METZGER. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION BEING THAT. ALL IN FAVOR, OPPOSE MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. THANK YOU SIR. MOVING RIGHT ALONG.

YOU CAN NOW SEE. OKAY. YEAH. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON LEVYING OF ASSESSMENTS FOR

[4. Conduct a public hearing on the levying of assessments for Improvement Area #5 in the Manor Heights Public Improvement District.]

IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER FIVE IN THE MENA HEIGHTS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. MR. ROBERT, YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. MY NAME IS ROBERT BATTLE. NOW, THIS IS INTERESTING. WE HAVE THESE PODS AND WE HAVE A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT TOO THAT KIND OF HELPS REGULATE THESE THINGS. IT'S MOSTLY CITIZENS. BUT FOR SOME REASON, WE'VE HAD A DEVELOPER WHO'S BEEN A FIXTURE ON THERE FOR LIKE, WHAT, 130 YEARS. HIS NAME IS BARTH TIMMERMAN. SO ONE THING WHEN WE TALK ABOUT PEOPLE ON THAT COMMITTEE, WE DO NOT NEED HIM ON THERE ANYMORE. HE'S A COMPLETE AND ABSOLUTE CONFLICT OF INTEREST. WE'VE GIVEN HIM MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF CHAPTER 80 GRANTS. WE'VE BOUGHT LOTS OF PROPERTY FROM HIM FOR MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, TOO. WE DON'T NEED HIM SITTING ON THAT COMMITTEE. NOW, THE OTHER THING ABOUT MANOR HEIGHTS IS BASICALLY THEY OWE US ABOUT $700,000 OF IN LIEU PARK FEES BECAUSE SOMEBODY TOLD THEM THAT A WATER RETENTION POND OF 15 ACRES WAS PARKLAND. ONE WORD PARKLAND.

THE CITY ATTORNEYS HAVE TOLD US THAT THAT'S NOT TRUE. AND THE CITY'S ATTORNEYS HAVE TOLD US THAT FLOODPLAIN IS NOT PARKLAND, AND THEY'VE TOLD US THAT OPEN SPACE IS NOT PARKLAND. SO THE BOTTOM LINE IS THEY OWE US OVER 700,000 BUCKS. AND MAYBE TO HELP THAT DEVELOPER BUILDER OUT, WE NEED TO RAISE THIS ASSESSMENT SO WE CAN COVER HIS TAIL END. I DON'T WANT THE CITY OF MANOR TO HAVE TO EAT HIS COSTS. THAT'S WHAT'S HAPPENING RIGHT NOW. YOU BASICALLY THEY

[00:30:04]

PUT IN A LITTLE SWIMMING POOL. THEY HAVE NOT ONE SQUARE FOOT OF PUBLIC SPACE ANYWHERE IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT ANYWHERE. I'M TALKING ABOUT OVER 15 YEARS. THAT'S HOW LONG THEY'VE BEEN RIPPING US OFF. IT DIDN'T START WITH YOU GUYS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COME ON. I'M SORRY. I'M OUT. GOOD EVENING. MAYOR. COUNCIL MEMBERS. VERONICA RIVERA, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY.

THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING THAT YOU CALLED BY RESOLUTION TWO AT YOUR LAST MEETING. IT IS TO LEVY THE ASSESSMENTS ON IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER FIVE. THIS IS THE LAST IMPROVEMENT AREA. AND IN MANOR HEIGHTS IN THE MANOR HEIGHTS PYD. AND IT IS TIED TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 20. THAT WILL COME UP LATER ON ON THE AGENDA FOR YOU TO DISCUSS AND APPROVE THE APPROVE THE LEVYING OF ASSESSMENTS. SO PREVIOUSLY YOU HAD APPROVED THE PRELIMINARY SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN, AND NOW YOU WILL BE LOOKING AT THE FINAL SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN, WHICH ALSO WILL SERVE AS THE ANNUAL SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN AS WELL. AND THERE IS SOMEONE FROM P3 TO DISCUSS THIS FURTHER. AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS NOW OR IF YOU'D LIKE TO WAIT FOR ITEM NUMBER 20, WE CAN WE'LL BE AVAILABLE AS WELL. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS NOW? WOULD YOU DO YOU ALL WANT TO WAIT TILL 20? LATER? ALL RIGHT. WELL, WE'LL WAIT TILL LATER.

ITEM 20. DO WE HAVE ANY YOU HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. MAYOR AND COUNCIL. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM NUMBER FOUR.

WELL, MOTION FORWARD BY COUNCIL MEMBER MORENO. IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN. WE'RE ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? BEING NONE. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? MOTION

[CONSENT AGENDA]

PASSES SIX ZERO. ALL THE FOLLOWING ON THE ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSIDERED TO BE SELF-EXPLANATORY BY COUNCIL AND WILL BE ENACTED ON MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION ON ITEMS UNLESS REQUESTED BY MAYOR OR COUNCIL MEMBER, IN WHICH THE ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. COUNCIL MEMBER IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU WANT TO PULL OUT OR HIGHLIGHT IN THE REPORT? IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MAYOR, COUNCIL, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS READ. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA. I NEED TO READ IT. RIGHT. YEAH. NUMBER FIVE. CONSIDERATION. DISCUSSION. POSSIBLE ACTION ON APPROVAL. ON APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL.

MINUTES SIX. CONSIDERATION. DISCUSSION. POSSIBLE ACTION ON REGARDING ACCEPTANCE OF THE MARCH 2026 CITY COUNCIL MONTHLY REPORT SEVEN CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ACCEPTANCE OF SECOND QUARTER 2026 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS EIGHT CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ACCEPTANCE OF THE MARCH 2026 DEPARTMENT REPORTS NINE. DISCUSSION POSSIBLE ACTION ON ACCEPTANCE OF CONVEYANCE OF A 0.983 ACRE DRAINAGE TREATMENT FOR, EXCUSE ME, BEING A PORTION OF LOT ONE A THE REPLAT OF LOT ONE RE OUT OF FORD MANOR AND NUMBER TEN CONSIDERATION DISCUSSION POSSIBLE ACTION ON A 2.359 ACRE TRACT OF LAND EASEMENT IN THE SUMMER. VACANT SURVEY 62 ABSTRACT NUMBER SIX THREE IN TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS. CONSIDERATION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON AN EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WITH MONROE MANVILLE WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION. WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR BY COUNCILWOMAN MESKO. IS THERE A SECOND? I SECOND SECOND BY COUNCILMAN MORENO. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? BEING NONE. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES

[12. Consideration, discussion, and possible action regarding a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Manor, Texas Supporting the Continued Participation of the Manor Police Department in the Texas Traffic Safety Comprehensive STEP (Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) – CIOT (Click it or Ticket) Grant for the Fiscal Year 2026; Authorizing the City Manager to Execute all necessary documentation; and designating the City Manager as the Authorized Official for all matters pertaining to the Grant, including future fiscal years; and establishing an effective date.]

SIX ZERO. NUMBER 12. CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TEXAS, SUPPORTING THE CONTINUED PARTICIPATION OF MANOR POLICE IN THE TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY COMPREHENSIVE STEP SELECTION. STEP SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM IS A CLICK IT OR TICKET GRANT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2026.

AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION AND DESIGNATING

[00:35:02]

THE CITY MANAGER AS AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL FOR ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO THE GRANT, INCLUDING MORE FISCAL YEARS AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. YES, SIR. MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

RYAN PHIPPS, CHIEF OF POLICE. THIS IS OUR ANNUAL STEP GRANT, AND I HAVE SERGEANT VEGA COMING FORWARD TO DISCUSS BECAUSE HE OVERSEES OUR TRAFFIC UNIT AS WELL AS THE GRANT WRITER BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT AND TEXDOT. ALL RIGHT. THE AWARD WINNING SERGEANT VEGA. GOOD EVENING. SO TODAY WE ARE I'M HERE TO ON THE AGENDA FOR THE CLICK IT OR TICKET GRANT SEEKING APPROVAL FOR IT. THE ENFORCEMENT PERIOD IS BETWEEN MAY 15TH AND JUNE 3RD OF 2026.

THIS GRANT IS REQUESTING 2000 $402,460. THAT'S REIMBURSED BACK TO THE CITY, BACK INTO THE GENERAL FUND. QUESTIONS COUNCIL MEMBERS. I HAVE A QUESTION AS FAR AS OUR NUMBERS FOR LAST YEAR AND WHAT WAS, I GUESS, PRODUCED FROM THESE TYPE OF EVENTS? WHAT CAN YOU GUYS TELL ME ABOUT THAT? AS YOU ALL HAVE PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED IN OUR MONTHLY REPORT, WE DO WHEN THERE IS ACTIVITY REPORT, THE THE ACTIVITY THAT THE OFFICERS USE, THE GRANT AND THE OUTCOME OF TICKETS OR, OR ARRESTS ON DWI OR WHATEVER IT IS THAT QUALIFIES FOR THE GRANT. I DON'T HAVE A TOTAL FOR ALL OF THAT, BUT WE CAN PRODUCE THAT FOR YOU ALL. IF THAT'S SOMETHING YOU'RE INTERESTED IN SEEING, I'D BE INTERESTED IN KNOWING. THANK YOU. OKAY. OTHER QUESTIONS? IS THIS A STATE OR FEDERAL FUNDED? IS IT A. BECAUSE THE STATE GRANT. BUT IS IT DOES IT HAVE A FEDERAL PASS THROUGH? YES, IT'S A FEDERAL PASS THROUGH TWO TEX DOT. AND THEN WE MAKE APPLICATION TO TECH STOCKS AND THE FEDERAL PASS THROUGH. ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONAL RULES OR REQUIREMENTS THAT MIGHT BE ASSOCIATED WITH IT BY TAKING FEDERAL IN THIS IN THE CLIMATE THAT WE'RE IN RIGHT NOW, THAT MIGHT HOLD US TO EXPECTATIONS.

NOT THAT WE'RE AWARE OF. THIS IS A PRETTY EASY GRANT. THEY YEARS AGO, THEY MADE THE PROCESS A LITTLE EASIER BECAUSE THEY WANTED DEPARTMENTS TO UTILIZE IT. OBVIOUSLY, THIS IS REMOVING INTOXICATED DRIVERS AND PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT WEARING SEAT BELTS AND CREATING SAFETY SITUATIONS ON OUR ROADWAYS. SO THEY WANTED THE EASE OF APPLICATION AND THE EASE OF USE.

BUT WITH THE CURRENT CLIENT, I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE MADE, AND THOSE MAY GO TO TEX DOT THEIR REQUIREMENTS FROM THEIR REPORTING IN MAY CHANGE, BUT I DON'T THINK THAT THERE'S ANYTHING DIFFERENT ON OUR END. ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY. NO, THERE'S NOTHING DIFFERENT. A LOT OF IT IS ALSO JUST PUBLIC EDUCATION. WHEN OFFICERS ARE CONDUCTING THE TRAFFIC STOPS. OKAY, IT'S USUALLY. DO YOU HAVE TO REPORT ANY DATA TO NHTSA OR EVERYTHING'S REPORTED TO TXDOT AND THEIR TECHS? DOT REPORTS TO NHTSA. OKAY. OKAY. WELL, IF YOU DON'T MIND, JUST DOUBLE CHECK THAT. IS IT MATCHING REQUIREMENT? MATCHING A MATCHING REQUIREMENT? NO, NO. OKAY. AND YEAH, IF YOU DON'T MIND, JUST DOUBLE CHECKING IT BECAUSE SOMETIMES SOME OF THE FEDERAL PASSTHROUGHS THAT ARE COMING THROUGH ARE, ARE, HAVE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE NOT NECESSARILY MENTIONED IN THE GRANT, BUT THERE'S ANOTHER LIST SOMEWHERE ELSE THAT SAYS, HEY, IF YOU'RE TAKING YOUR LAW ENFORCEMENT ARE TAKING THESE SERIES OF FEDERAL GRANTS, THEN YOU HAVE TO BE ABLE TO RESPOND AND DO CERTAIN THINGS IF YOU GET CAUGHT BY THE FEDS. SO WE JUST MAKE SURE THAT THIS IS ONE THAT IS CLEAR, FREE AND CLEAR. YEAH, WE'LL CHECK ON THAT. GENERALLY, IF THERE'S ANY CHANGES, THEY ARE PRETTY GOOD ABOUT LETTING US KNOW, BUT I DON'T THINK THAT I'VE SEEN ANY CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS YEAR APPLICATIONS. SO WE HAVEN'T HAD WE HAVEN'T HAD ANY ISSUES SO FAR. YEAH. WELL YEAH, THIS IS A NEW THING. SO YEAH, JUST JUST DOUBLE CHECK IT ON THE ON THE NEW KIND OF LANDING LAST SEVERAL MONTHS, YOU KNOW, JUST SO WE CAN BE AWARE OF THE DECISIONS WE'RE MAKING. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, TEAM? I HAVE A QUESTION. IT SOUNDS REDUNDANT, BUT CAN YOU RE-EXPLAIN WHAT YOU WHAT THE CLICK IT OR TICKET GRANT IS AS IF I WASN'T A PERSON THAT KNOWS ABOUT LAW STUFF. BUT ALL I KNOW IS THAT IF YOU DON'T CLICK IT, YOU GET A TICKET. BUT JUST FOR EVERYONE TO KNOW, BEAT ME TO MAKE SURE THE CLICK IT OR TICKET IS JUST A MOBILIZATION GRANT. IT'S

[00:40:02]

DIRECTLY FOCUSED ON OVERALL TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT, BUT THE PRIMARY FOCUS IS SEATBELT SAFETY, WHETHER IT BE DRIVER, PASSENGER, OR CHILD SAFETY. LIKE I SAID, MOST OF THE GOAL IS ALL TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT AND PUBLIC EDUCATION WHILE CONDUCTING THAT TRAFFIC STOP.

SO IT'S NOT A GRANT THAT OFFICERS HAVE TO GIVE TICKETS. THAT'S NOT THE GOAL. THE GOAL IS PUBLIC EDUCATION AND ENSURING THAT EVERYONE'S SAFE ON THE PUBLIC ROADWAY. OKAY, SO THE EDUCATION ONLY COMES IF YOU GET STOPPED. YES, BUT DOES THAT GUARANTEE A TICKET? NO. OKAY.

ARE THERE OTHER AREAS? WHERE IS IT JUST IN THAT WINDOW OR IS THAT JUST THE WINDOW OF THE GRANT APPLICATION? THAT'S ONLY THE THE WINDOW FOR THIS GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE TICKET. SO NO, NO, NO, THIS IS ONLY FOR THIS GRANT IS ONLY FOR A TWO WEEK PERIOD. OKAY. OH, SO FOR TWO WEEKS YOU WILL ENFORCE THE EDUCATION OF CLICK IT OR TICKET. WHAT AM I MISSING IT. SO WHAT THE GRANT PROVIDES US IS TO PAY OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT ON STAFF TO COME IN ON THEIR TIME OFF TO WORK OVERTIME. THEN WE SUBMIT THE THE HOURS OF THE OFFICERS THAT CAME IN AND WORKED TO TEXDOT, AND THEY REIMBURSE US FOR THE COST THAT THE CITY HAD ACCRUED TO PAY THOSE OFFICERS.

SO WE THEY'RE PAYING FOR OFFICERS TO BE ON THE STREET TO BE ADDRESSING THESE SPECIFIC ISSUES FOR A TWO WEEK PERIOD, FOR A TWO WEEK PERIOD. OKAY. YEAH. AND DOES IT MATCH OUR CURRENT, I GUESS, IS THAT TIME AND A HALF OR IS THAT JUST REGULAR TIME? I BELIEVE IT'S PAID AT TIME AND A HALF. THAT'S HOW IT'S DONE. OKAY. SO IT WILL WE CAN MEET THAT AMOUNT OR WILL WE, WILL WE PAY MORE ON OUR SIDE THAN WHAT THEY WOULD ACTUALLY REIMBURSE? NO.

WHATEVER WE PAY, THEY WILL REIMBURSE US FOR THAT COST. OKAY. DO YOU HAVE OFFICERS CURRENTLY? HOW DO THEY SIGN UP? NO, OFFICERS HAVEN'T SIGNED UP YET BECAUSE I'M STILL GETTING APPROVAL THROUGH TXDOT. IT'S STILL IN THE APPLICATION PROCESS, BUT I WANTED TO COME BEFORE AND GET THE BALL ROLLING WITH IT BEFORE WE MAKE IT, BEFORE I MOVE FORWARD WITH IT.

THANK YOU. CAN YOU DEFINE, I GUESS, THE EXPECTATION THAT YOU WANT FOR THE CITY MANAGER IN TERMS OF INCLUDING FUTURE FISCAL YEARS, KIND OF WHAT THE INTENT BEHIND THAT IS? ONE MORE TIME. I'M SORRY. OH, IT SAYS DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER AS AN AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL FOR ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO THE GRANT, INCLUDING FUTURE FISCAL YEARS. I DON'T KNOW IF WE'VE DONE IT THAT WAY BEFORE. AND, YOU KNOW, WE HAVEN'T. I GOT IT FROM JAMES. OKAY. YEAH. I DON'T KNOW IF WE'VE EVER DONE THAT BEFORE, BUT I THINK THAT THERE'S SOME COMMUNITIES THAT DO IT WHERE THEY JUST PERMIT ONGOING APPLICATION FOR THESE GRANTS THROUGH TEX DOT. SO WE COULD HAVE GOTTEN THAT LANGUAGE FROM ANOTHER COMMUNITY OR FROM TEX DOT DIRECTLY. OKAY. ARE YOU OPPOSED TO A SHORTER PERIOD OF TIME OR JUST HAVING A DESIGNATED TIME PERIOD SO THAT IT COMES BACK LESS OFTEN THAN ANNUAL? WE'RE, WE'RE, WE'RE NOT OPPOSED TO ANYTHING THAT HOW HOWEVER Y'ALL WANTED TO WORK. IT DOESN'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE TO US IF WE COME BACK EVERY TIME.

IT MAKES IT EASIER IN JUST OUR PROCESS. IF HE HAS THE AUTHORITY FROM YOU GUYS TO, TO BLESS IT. BUT IT, IT DOESN'T IT'S NO DIFFERENCE TO US. YEAH. JUST SO THAT IF FOR WHATEVER REASON, THE NEW COUNCIL COMES AND THEY'RE LIKE, I'M COMPLETELY AGAINST CLICK IT OR TICKET, YOU KNOW, THEY HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE IT COME BEFORE THEM AT ANOTHER TIME PERIOD VERSUS, YOU KNOW, THE BLANKET, YOU KNOW, FOREVER CHECK. YEAH. FOR SURE. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS. OKAY. NO, I'LL SAY I THINK WITH EVERYTHING THAT WE HAVE TWO 9973 ANY PROGRAMS THAT TEX DOT CAN ROLL OUT TO CITIES AND IN THIS CASE MANNER, WE CAN BE IN A POSITION TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF SOME OF THOSE PROGRAMS. SO I THINK OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL YEARS, AS THE MAYOR HAS INDICATED, WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO COME BACK AND BE ABLE TO PRESENT IF THERE'S A NEW PROGRAM THAT TEX DOT ROLLS OUT THAT WE WANT TO GET BLESSING FROM COUNCIL, SO IT DOESN'T APPEAR WE'RE DOING THINGS CONTRARY TO BEING SAFE OR BEING IN SOME EXPENDITURE THAT WE HAVE TO EXPEND TO IMPLEMENT A PROGRAM THAT TEX DOT WANT. AND I THINK US AND OTHER PARTS OF THE REGION THAT ARE HAVING A LOT OF HIGH GROWTH AND CONSTRUCTION MAY LEAD TO OTHER PROGRAMS THAT THEY WANT TO SEE, TO GIVE BACK AND HELP US BE ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN ADDRESSING SOME OF THOSE PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES WITH THE MONEY THAT WE'D HAVE TO SPEND TO MAKE SURE WE CAN GET REIMBURSED FOR THOSE ACTIVITIES. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. COUNCILWOMAN HILL.

[00:45:06]

YOU MAY HAVE ALREADY ANSWERED THIS QUESTION OR ASKING JUST ABOUT REPORTING. IS THERE A WAY THAT WE WOULD BE AWARE OF THE REPORTING, I GUESS THROUGH THAT TIME, LIKE MAYBE THE EITHER THE TWO WEEKS BEFORE OR THE TWO WEEKS AFTER COMPARED TO THAT TWO WEEKS THAT YOU DO HAVE THE EXTRA OFFICERS. WELL, WE DO SUBMIT A REPORT IN THE MONTHLY REPORT THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT TO Y'ALL ON THE THE AMOUNT THAT WAS REQUESTED BACK FROM TEX DOT AND THE NUMBER OF CITATIONS AND OR TICKETS, I'M SORRY, CITATIONS OR WARNINGS AND OR DWI ARRESTS, DEPENDING ON THE PROGRAM THAT WE'RE, WE'RE LOOKING AT. SO. IS, ARE YOU ASKING FOR SOMETHING ON TOP OF THAT? WELL, I GUESS IF IT WAS, I DIDN'T SEE UNLESS IT WAS ON HERE AND I HAVEN'T. I LOOKED BACK AGAIN, BUT WHERE IF IT WAS SPECIFIC FOR NOT HAVING YOUR SEATBELT AND NOT OKAY, I MEAN I GUESS OTHER OFFENSES COULD COME AFTER THAT, BUT JUST. YEAH, THAT. SO YES, WE CAN REPORT THAT. BUT YOU KNOW, SOMETHING UP FRONT, THERE ARE OTHER VIOLATIONS THAT COME FROM TRAFFIC STOPS. SO IF THE OFFICER WORKING CLICK IT OR TICKET STOPS AN INDIVIDUAL FOR NOT WEARING THEIR SEATBELT. AND WHEN THEY GET UP THERE, THEY SEE THEIR REGISTRATION STICKER IS EXPIRED OR THEY DON'T HAVE INSURANCE OR THEY DON'T HAVE A DRIVER'S LICENSE, THAT STOP COULD RESULT IN MORE CITATIONS THAN JUST THE PURPOSE OF THE STOP. SO DO YOU WANT TO SEE EVERYTHING RESULTING FROM THOSE STOPS, OR DO YOU WANT TO JUST SEE HOW MANY TICKETS AND WARNINGS OR DWI THAT RESULTED FROM THE GRANT? ARE YOU ALREADY MERGING THEM OR ARE YOU ALREADY ARE YOU DURING THE GRANT PERIOD, YOU'RE DOING YOUR MONTHLY REPORT? ARE YOU ALREADY MERGING THE CLICK IT OR TICKET DATA FROM THOSE TWO WEEKS INTO THE INTO YOUR NORMAL MONTHLY REPORT? OR ARE YOU DOING THEM SEPARATE? SO THE NUMBERS THAT ARE REPORTED FOR TRAFFIC STOPS EACH MONTH, THOSE TICKETS WOULD BE INCLUDED IN THAT NUMBER. HOWEVER, WE DO THE SEPARATE CLICK IT OR TICKET REPORT OR THE THE GRANT REPORT. AND I BELIEVE THAT THAT IS WORDED AS HOW MANY STOPS WERE CONDUCTED, NOT WHAT THE RESULT OF THOSE TRAFFIC STOPS WERE. SO HOW MANY TRAFFIC STOPS WERE RESULTED, HOW MANY HOURS WERE WORKED BY THE OFFICERS, WHICH RESULTED IN WHAT WAS THE REIMBURSEMENT FROM TEX DOT. SO THE TEX DOT 40% OF THE TEX DOT REPORT REQUIRES LESS THAN WHAT HE'S ALREADY GIVEN US IN THE MONTHLY REPORT. AND THEN YOU'RE ASKING WHAT WE LIKE TO SEE A DISAGGREGATION DURING THAT TWO WEEK PERIOD OF IN THAT MONTH OF THE TWO WEEK PERIOD THAT SAYS THAT, HEY, THESE ADDITIONAL OFFICERS THAT WERE ON THAT CAME ON AT THE TIME AND HALF THIS IS WHAT THEY COLLECTED ALL TOGETHER. CORRECT. OR WE CAN WE CAN BREAK DOWN THE DATA. HOWEVER YOU ALL WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT. WE WERE TRYING TO JUST GIVE THE BROAD OVERVIEW OF THE EFFECT OF THE OF THE THE GRANT. RIGHT. SO HOW MANY STOPS, WHAT DID WHAT QUALIFIED US, YOU KNOW, AND WHAT DID WE REPORT TO TEX DOT WHICH ONE WHAT IS THAT? WHAT IS DOES THAT HELP FOR YOUR CLARITY FOR YOUR ASK OR YOUR REQUEST? IT DOES. YOU'RE TELLING ME THE DATA IS THERE.

WE JUST HAVE TO ASK FOR IT WHEN IT COMES UP. I'M OKAY WITH THAT. ABSOLUTELY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. OTHER QUESTIONS. WILL YOU GUYS BE PUSHING OUT LIKE ANY MARKETING LIKE YOU KNOW, YOU WERE GOING TO DO CLICK IT OR TICKET? YEAH. FOR SO PART OF THE GRANT IS THAT WE DO HAVE TO DO A PRE PRE MEDIA POST LETTING THE PUBLIC KNOW THAT WE ARE GOING TO BE STARTING THE GRANT AND HAVING THE ENFORCEMENT ZONES, WHICH THE ENFORCEMENT ZONES ARE GOING TO BE. I BELIEVE IT'S. PARSONS ALL THE WAY TO 973 NORTH TO NINE SEVEN 3 TO 2 9290 BACK WEST TOWARDS I BELIEVE IT'S GREG MANOR AND THE GREG MANOR BACK SOUTH. THAT'S ENFORCEMENT ZONE ONE.

ENFORCEMENT ZONE TWO IS GOING TO BE NORTH CITY LIMITS OF 973 BACK TO 290 AND THEN 290 BACK EAST ALL THE WAY TO I THINK IT'S VOLKER, VOLKER LANE, VOLKER STREET. THAT'S THE WHOLE CITY. WELL, THE THE DATE IS USUALLY IT'S IT'S COME FROM ALL THE CRASH ZONES. YEAH. SO TEX DOT KIND OF HELPS GENERATE WHERE OUR ZONES SHOULD BE AT OR HIGH, HIGH COLLISION AREAS.

YEAH. OTHER QUESTIONS. IF THERE ARE NONE, I WILL TAKE A MOTION. OH, AND IF YOU'RE SO IN THE LANGUAGE YOU CAN READ AS REGULAR OR ASSIGN A SHORTER PERIOD OR LONGER PERIOD ON THE

[00:50:02]

WHERE IT STATES THE COMMUNICATION ABOUT THE THE YEARS. LET ME GO BACK TO IT.

AND THE CITY SECRETARY HAS JUST INFORMED ME THAT THE LANGUAGE AS IT IS, IS HOW IT WAS PRESENTED LAST YEAR AS WELL. AND WE STILL CAME FORWARD. OKAY. OOPS. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. YES, MA'AM. MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS, VERONICA RIVERA, CITY ATTORNEY, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO JUST LIMIT IT TO 2026, THAT WOULD BE YOUR MOTION. AND AND WE WOULD JUST REVISE THE RESOLUTION BECAUSE THEIR RESOLUTION IS IN YOUR BACKUP ALREADY. SO CITY LEGAL WOULD BE REVISING THE RESOLUTION, BASICALLY JUST DELETING INCLUDING FUTURE FISCAL YEARS IF YOU SO CHOOSE. SO THAT'S SECOND 012345 6 TO 6 PARAGRAPH WHERE IT STATES 2026 AND FUTURE FISCAL YEARS. IT CAN EITHER WE'RE SAYING 2026 ONLY OR IF WE WOULD LIKE TO GRANT ADDITIONAL YEARS, THEN WE COULD SAY UP TO SUCH AND SUCH YEAR, CORRECT? YES. IF YOU WANTED TO NOT JUST LIMIT IT TO 2026, BUT UP TO HOWEVER MANY YEARS, THEN YOU COULD ALSO DO THAT. WE WOULD MAKE THAT CORRECTION NOT ONLY IN THE BODY OF THE RESOLUTION, BUT ALSO IN THE PREAMBLE, THE THE CAPTION AT THE TOP. OKAY. EVERYBODY GOOD. I UNDERSTAND. ALL RIGHT. TAKE A MOTION. LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 2020 608 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAYNARD, TEXAS, SUPPORTING THE CONTINUED PARTICIPATION OF THE MAYNARD POLICE DEPARTMENT IN THE TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY COMPREHENSIVE STEP SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM. CLICK IT OR TICKET GRANT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2026. AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION AND DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER AS THE AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL FOR ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO THE GRANT, INCLUDING FUTURE FISCAL YEARS AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. AS WRITTEN OR ONE YEAR SEPARATE. LAST YEAR'S ONE YEAR.

WE HAVE A MOTION BEFORE US BY COUNCILWOMAN. WHERE IS THERE A SECOND I SECOND? SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM HERE. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTIONS? I HAVE A QUESTION. YES, MA'AM.

THE READING ON THE ACTION ITEM WAS OH EIGHT AND THE RESOLUTION NUMBER SAYS OH SEVEN. SO I JUST THAT CORRECTION ON THE ITEM 12 PAGE 165. 164 165. THE FOLLOWING PAGE DOES HAVE IT AS OH EIGHT IS JUST THAT FIRST PAGE HAS OH SEVEN. YEAH, IT'S AT THE VERY TOP. IS IT OKAY? WITH THE REST OF THE. OH. YEAH. IS IT A087? OH, WAIT, WAIT, YOU SAID YOU RAN AWAY. SO WE'RE GOOD, RIGHT? OKAY. NOW ANY OTHER QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? EVERYONE GOOD WITH THE ONE YEAR? OKAY. YES, MA'AM. ASK FOR CLARIFICATION ON THE 2027. JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, IS IT 2020? IT'S 2627 FISCAL FISCAL YEAR. YEAH. I THINK WE I THINK WE'RE SAYING JUST ONE FISCAL YEAR, CORRECT? YEAH. YEAH, YEAH. THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR. OKAY. CORRECT. COUNCILWOMAN. WE'RE

[00:55:01]

ALL RIGHT. YES. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION? EVERYONE GOOD.

ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR AND PROPER SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE. OH.

I'M SORRY. WHEN WE ALL FIND OUT ABOUT IT, DO WE. WHEN DO WE GET THE. SERGEANT VEGA. SERGEANT.

WHEN DO WE GET THE ANSWER ON THE ON THE GRANT. I CAN EMAIL THE REPRESENTATIVE TOMORROW AND GET MORE INFORMATION. HE USUALLY SENDS. HE'S PRETTY QUICK ABOUT IT, BUT I'M NOT SURE. HOPEFULLY SOON. OKAY. BUT IT'S LIKE THERE. IS THERE A DEADLINE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, OR IS IT ONE OF THOSE THAT ROLLS? USUALLY WHENEVER THEY'RE READY TO ROLL IT OUT, THEY'LL ROLL IT OUT. LIKE THE LAST THING WE DID, THE IDM GRANT, IT WAS ROLLED OUT LIKE TWO WEEKS PRIOR. SO WE'RE PROBABLY RIGHT IN THAT THRESHOLD. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. CONSIDERATION

[13. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Professional Services Agreement with Clearview AI, Inc., an investigative platform that uses facial recognition technology. ]

DISCUSSION. POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN AGREEMENT FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICE. I'M SORRY.

I'M ON 13. IS THAT RIGHT? YES. YEAH. FOR CONSIDERATION. POSSIBLE ACTION ON A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR CLEARVIEW AI INC. AND INVESTIGATIVE PLATFORM THAT USES FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY. YES, MA'AM. OR YES, SIR. LIEUTENANT ALLEN WAS LISTED ON Y'ALL'S SUMMARY. HE'S UNABLE TO MAKE IT TONIGHT. SO SERGEANT EATON, WHO OVERSEES OUR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION, IS HERE TO PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THIS. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. CLEARVIEW AI IS AN ALREADY BUDGETED FOR INVESTIGATIVE TOOL THAT WOULD ASSIST OUR AGENCY IN SOLVING CRIME AND KEEPING OUR COMMUNITY SAFE. IT IS A SEARCH ENGINE THAT SEARCHES IMAGES COMPILED FROM PUBLICLY AVAILABLE ONLINE SOURCES. IN REFERENCE TO THE COMMENTS THAT WERE MADE EARLIER. IT IS NOT PROBABLE CAUSE TO MAKE AN ARREST. IT'S SIMPLY AN INVESTIGATIVE TOOL THAT LEADS US TO FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS. I KNOW IT WAS REFERENCED THAT THEY HAD WORKED WITH GOOGLE AND PRIVATE COMPANIES BEFORE. THEY NO LONGER DO THAT. THEY EXCLUSIVELY WORK WITH VETTED LAW ENFORCEMENT AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ONLY. AND I'M UNAWARE OF ANY LAWSUITS WITH THE PUBLIC OR WITH THE PRIVATE COMPANY, SO I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO SPEAK WITH TO THAT, UNFORTUNATELY. IS THIS A US BASED COMPANY OR A EUROPEAN BASED COMPANY? IT'S US BASED. OKAY. I THINK MAYBE THE. ISSUE WAS IN I GUESS IT WAS THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IN 2020. THAT'S WHEN IT WAS FILED. QUESTIONS? COUNCIL MEMBERS.

CAN YOU TELL US A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT LIKE. HOW WE ARRIVED, AS YOU KNOW, COMPARED TO ALL OF OUR SURROUNDING CITIES, OF COURSE, A LOT OF PEOPLE COME THROUGH HERE AND THAT'S IN MY VERSION. LIKE, THAT'S MY REASON TO SAY WE'VE ARRIVED AT THIS POINT WHERE WE NEED THIS TECHNOLOGY IN OUR CITY. BUT CAN YOU GIVE MORE INSIGHT OF WHY THIS CAME UP AND NOW? YES, MA'AM. ABSOLUTELY. SO I CAN SPEAK TO MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCE IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS. SO THE REASON I EVEN LEARNED ABOUT THIS TECHNOLOGY WAS I WAS OUR CHILD ABUSE DETECTIVE BEFORE I GOT PROMOTED. AND I WAS WORKING THESE UNDERCOVER OPERATIONS WHERE I WAS FINDING THESE CHILD PREDATORS ONLINE. OFTENTIMES THEY WOULD SEND ME THEIR FACES AND I DID NOT HAVE THEM IDENTIFIED, AND IT WOULD BE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO GET THEM IDENTIFIED PRIOR TO MEETING THEM. WITH THIS KIND OF TECHNOLOGY, YOU CAN UPLOAD THEM AGAIN TO THIS SEARCH ENGINE. AND THIS IS ALL PUBLICLY. THESE ARE ALL PUBLIC IMAGES WHERE YOU GUYS WOULD BE ABLE TO FIND THEM AS WELL. IT JUST CONSOLIDATES THESE PUBLIC IMAGES SO IT MAKES IT MORE EFFICIENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT. SO I WOULD BE ABLE TO UPLOAD A SUSPECT PHOTOGRAPH OR IF I HAD AN UNIDENTIFIED CHILD VICTIM TO THIS SEARCH ENGINE, AND IT WOULD

[01:00:05]

EFFICIENTLY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE LINKS TO MAYBE HIS SOCIAL MEDIA OR MAYBE A PREVIOUS MUGSHOT OR THINGS LIKE THAT, HIS OR HER AND I WOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE INVESTIGATIVE LEADS THAT WAY.

SO THAT'S JUST ONE EXAMPLE. SAME THING IF WE HAVE SURVEILLANCE FOOTAGE OF SOMEONE STEALING SOMETHING AT WALMART OR THINGS LIKE THAT, IT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT CAN MORE EFFICIENTLY PROVIDE INVESTIGATIVE LEADS FOR US. OVER IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS.

YES, MA'AM. WHAT AGENCIES DO THEY SHARE THE DATA WITH? SO THE IMAGES THAT I LIKE, WE WERE TO UPLOAD. SO AGAIN, I'M SORRY, COULD YOU CLARIFY YOUR QUESTION? WHAT AGENCIES I GUESS, HAVE ACCESS TO THIS DATA. SO IT'S IT'S ONLY LAW ENFORCEMENT AND GOVERNMENT THAT HAVE BEEN VETTED BY THEM. I DON'T KNOW WHO SPECIFICALLY HAS PURCHASED THIS SOFTWARE. I DO KNOW LOCALLY IT'S PFLUGERVILLE. I KNOW THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY USES IT. I'M SORRY HE DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING. OKAY. BUT THAT'S AS FAR AS I KNOW, LOCALLY. YEAH. IN TEXAS LAW, CAN FACIAL RECOGNITION BE USED AS THE SOLE THING TO, ON THE SOLE BASIS TO ARREST SOMEONE? I KNOW THERE'S SOME STATES WHERE IT'S NOT ALLOWED TO BE USED AS THE SOLE REASON FOR ARREST. NO, MA'AM. SO WE WOULDN'T. SO PROBABLE CAUSE IS A COMPLICATED MONSTER, RIGHT? FOR WHICH IS OUR STANDARD FOR AN ARREST. HERE IN TEXAS. WE CALL IT THE TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES. SO I KNOW FOR OUR DEPARTMENT, THAT WOULD NOT BE OUR STANDARD IF WE WERE TO HAVE A MATCH ON THIS TECHNOLOGY, IT WOULD SIMPLY BE SOMETHING FOR US TO FOLLOW UP ON. SO SAY IT MATCHED ON THEIR SOCIAL MEDIA. IT WOULD BE SOMETHING WHERE WE WOULD BE ABLE TO FOLLOW UP WITH THEIR DRIVER'S LICENSE PHOTO, AND WE WOULD BE ABLE TO CONTACT THEM POTENTIALLY FOR AN INTERVIEW AND THINGS LIKE THAT, WHERE WE WOULD BE ABLE TO GATHER MORE INFORMATION TO FORM PROBABLE CAUSE, BUT IT WOULD NOT BE SOMETHING WHERE WE WOULD JUST BE ABLE TO MAKE THAT ARREST BASED OFF OF FACIAL RECOGNITION MATCH ALONE. THANK YOU. YES, MA'AM. QUESTION. WHAT SAFEGUARDS ARE IN PLACE FOR WRONGFUL IDENTIFICATION OR MISUSE? SURE. SO THERE IS THEY MANDATE TRAINING. WE ALSO HAVE POLICY THAT IS GOING TO BE PUT IN PLACE PRIOR TO THIS BEING PUT OUT IN OUR DEPARTMENT AS WELL. WE THERE'S ALSO PEER REVIEW THAT WE CAN MANDATE. SO IF I THINK THAT THIS PERSON IS A MATCH WITH FACIAL RECOGNITION, I CAN SEND IT OFF TO. OR WE CAN FORCE IT TO BE SENT OFF TO APPEAR TO BE REVIEWED AS WELL.

AND AGAIN, IT'S NOT THE STANDARD FOR PROBABLE CAUSE EITHER. SO IT'S, IT'S JUST A TOOL, RIGHT? IT'S, IT'S SOMETHING FOR US TO LOOK AT AND LEAD US IN MAYBE THE CORRECT DIRECTION AND SEE IF IT LEADS US TO WHERE WE NEED TO BE. OTHER QUESTIONS, CONCERNS.

WOULD THIS BE COULD THIS EVER GO TO COURT TO BE USED AS. LIKE FOR VIOLATING PRIVACY LAWS FOR ANY REASON FOR ANYONE? SO NO MA'AM, NOT CURRENTLY. IT'S NOT A REAL TIME SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM.

SO IT'S NOT WE DON'T HAVE CAMERAS OUT THERE, YOU KNOW, WATCHING YOU AND UPLOADING YOUR FACE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IT'S AGAIN, IT'S ALL OPEN SOURCE. SO IT'S EVERYTHING THAT IS ALREADY OUT THERE ON THE INTERNET AND PUBLICLY AVAILABLE. EVEN IF YOU'RE LIKE, SAY YOUR INSTAGRAM ACCOUNT IS PRIVATE, THEY CAN'T ACCESS IT. SO THOSE PHOTOS WON'T BE ON THIS SEARCH ENGINE AS WELL. THANK YOU. YES, MA'AM. I'M SORRY. I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION. AS FAR AS THE PAYMENTS THAT ARE SCHEDULED, IS IT DIVIDED AS AN INCREASE FOR A REASON? IS THERE LIKE MORE EXPENDITURES THAT ARE HAPPENING AFTERWARDS? OR WHAT IS THE REASONING FOR THE DIFFERENCE? I BELIEVE THAT IT'S PRORATED. WE'RE COMING IN PRETTY LATE IN THE YEAR. AND SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE STEP UP IS ON THAT. BUT FOR THIS BUDGET YEAR, YOU SEE IT'S SUBSTANTIALLY LOWER THAN FOLLOWING YEARS. I BELIEVE THAT IT'S PRORATED FOR US COMING IN LATE. IF I'M INCORRECT. CORRECT. EXCUSE ME. DENVER COLLINS ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE CHIEF IS CORRECT. THE REASON THE FIRST YEAR IT IS IT IS PRORATED AND THEN THE NEXT TWO YEARS SHOULD BE PRETTY MUCH

[01:05:03]

EQUAL. IT SHOULD BE IN THE THERE'S A $5,000 DIFFERENCE. SO THAT'S WHY IT'S A $5,000 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN YEAR TWO AND YEAR THREE. SO I WAS JUST ASKING IS BECAUSE IT'S PRORATED.

DO WE HAVE ANYBODY HERE FROM CLEARVIEW? NO SIR. UNFORTUNATELY THEY HAD SOMETHING IN HOUSTON AND WERE UNABLE TO MAKE IT TODAY. OKAY. I MY MORE SPECIFIC QUESTION. I WAS WAITING FOR THEM TO FINISH THEIRS IS JUST INTO THE THE FEDERAL AGENCY CONNECTION AND SHARE SHARING SPECIFICALLY WHICH, WHICH AGENCIES AND HOW THEY GET ACCESS TO THE DATA.

YOU KNOW, IF WE'RE, IF WE'RE GETTING, IF WE COLLECT IMAGES AND PUT IT IN OUR SYSTEM OR OTHER SYSTEMS OR WHATEVER, HOW, HOW DOES THAT CONNECT TO CERTAIN FEDERAL AGENCIES? AND SO THAT'S, THAT'S REALLY MY, I HAVE A SPECIFIC QUESTION TOWARDS THAT. IS THERE, WHAT'S THE TIMELINE OR THE QUOTE ON THIS CONTRACT BEFORE IT EXPIRES? I BELIEVE THAT IT'S ANNUALLY THAT WE CAN CHOOSE NOT TO EXTEND THE THE THE CONTRACT. NO, NO, I MEAN, LIKE USUALLY YOU GOT TO GET A QUOTE AND THE QUOTE IS GOOD FOR THIS MANY 30 DAYS, 60 DAYS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT BEFORE YOU HAVE TO GET ANOTHER QUOTE AND THE PRICE CHANGES. DO YOU HAVE ANY INSIGHT ON THAT? I BELIEVE THAT IT'S THE THREE YEARS THAT ARE QUOTED ON ON THE SUMMARY FORM.

SO IF WE WAIT, IF WE WAIT IT TO MAY FOR FOR CLEARVIEW TO BE HERE TO ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS, THEN WE WENT THE $30,000 WOULDN'T CHANGE. I DON'T BELIEVE SO. OKAY. OKAY. YEAH.

YOUR QUESTION, THIS WAS UNLIKE OTHER OTHER PLATFORMS. THIS IS NOT A DATA SHARING. LIKE SERGEANT EATON STATED, WE ONLY UPLOAD A PICTURE LIKE IF WE HAVE A SUSPECT'S PICTURE FROM THE CHILD PREDATOR CASE, SHE UPLOADS IT AND IT MATCHES IT TO SOCIAL MEDIA, OR THIS PERSON'S BEEN ON THE NEWS OR IN THE PAPERS OR WHATNOT. THAT'S WHERE THE INFORMATION COMES FROM.

IT'S NOT WE DON'T GET A GROUP OF PHOTOS AND JUST BLAST IT OUT. NO, NOT FOR THE DATABASE. I UNDERSTAND THAT PART. I'M JUST I GUESS YOU GET A PHOTO OF A SUSPECT AND YOU'RE RIGHT AT THE CHECK WHEN YOU PUT THE PHOTO OF THE SUSPECT IN THE SYSTEM. AND IT'S NOT A PERSON WE'RE LOOKING FOR, DOES IT COME BACK OUT OR DOES IT STAY FOREVER IN THE SYSTEM? AND IF IT'S FOREVER IN THE SYSTEM, IS IT NOW SHARED WITH THE ENTIRE FEDERAL AGENCY? BECAUSE IF WE'RE NOT LOOKING FOR SO AND SO, AND WE PUT THEM IN THE SYSTEM, THEY'RE NOW IN THE DATABASE FOR ALL FEDERAL AGENCIES TO RUN CHECKS ON THEM FOR ANYTHING ELSE. AND I'M WHAT I'M REALLY SKATING AROUND IS THE WHOLE IMMIGRATION PIECE. AND SO WHICH WE CHECKED THIS INDIVIDUAL AND THERE'S NOT A ISSUE NOW THEY'RE IN THE DATABASE AND NOW IMMIGRATION AGENCY SAYS, OH, HEY, LOOK, LET'S CHECK THAT PERSON. OH, YOU KNOW WHAT? LET'S GO DOWN AND PICK THEM UP. SO THAT'S WHAT I'M THAT'S THE QUESTION I WANT TO BE ABLE TO ASK, GET ASKED ANSWER. BECAUSE THERE'S, YOU'RE RIGHT. THERE'S SO MUCH STUFF ON THE INTERNET THAT CAN LEAD PEOPLE DIFFERENT KIND OF WAYS. AND SO TO BE ABLE TO. SO MY, MY QUESTIONS WILL BE DIRECTLY TO THEM AND THEN THEY'LL BE ABLE TO LOOK AT THE CONTRACT LANGUAGE FOR ASSURANCE THAT THE WORK WE NEED TO DO FOR SOLVING ISSUES HERE WON'T LEAD TO US, YOU KNOW, CAUSING HARM TO, TO FOLKS WHO ARE JUST SUSPECTS. SURE. I FROM FROM MY UNDERSTANDING IS WHEN YOU UPLOAD A PHOTOGRAPH, IT COULD STAY IN A DATABASE THAT WAY. IF THE FBI, JT, YOU KNOW, IS LOOKING FOR A TERRORIST AND AND WE HAVE ENTERED IT IN A PRIOR SEARCH, WE WANT THEM TO SEE THAT WE HAD SOME ENTRY INTO THAT. RIGHT. BUT WHEN WE MAKE AN ENTRY, WE'RE NOT ENTERING PEOPLE WITH THEIR IMMIGRATION STATUS. WE'RE NOT PUTTING SOMEBODY IN SAYING ANYTHING OTHER THAN, HERE'S THIS PICTURE.

WE NEED TO FIND WHO THIS INDIVIDUAL IS. SO I WOULD THINK, AND I COULD BE WRONG, THAT THE PHOTOS DO STAY AS SOMETHING THAT IS ENTERED FOR OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES WHO ARE USING THIS SOFTWARE TO SAY, OH, WELL, MAYNOR HAS ALSO SAID, YOU KNOW, SUBMITTED A PHOTO THAT MATCHES OUR PERSON. AND SO LET'S FIND OUT WHAT, YOU KNOW, WHERE MAYNOR GOT THAT PHOTO OR WHAT THEY'RE LOOKING AT INTO THAT INTO THAT INDIVIDUAL. YEAH. AND I, AND I, I UNDERSTAND THAT

[01:10:02]

IT CAN BE IF SOMEONE'S COMMITTED A CRIME SOMEWHERE FAR AWAY THAT'S HEINOUS OR WHATEVER.

RIGHT. AND THEY'VE BEEN LOOKING FOR THEM, THEY POP UP HERE. THERE'S A BENEFIT FOR THAT. I JUST THINK FOR, FOR US AS ALSO ELECTED OFFICIALS OR COMMUNITY, THAT'S, THAT'S WANTS TO BE ABLE TO BE SAFE, GOING TO WORK INTO THE STORE. WE IT WOULD BE GOOD IF WE COULD ACTUALLY HAVE THEM HERE TO ASK SOME OF THOSE QUESTIONS AND THEN KIND OF GO FROM THERE. OKAY. THAT'S ME.

I'M ONLY ONE VOTE, BUT THAT'S ME. THAT'S THAT WOULD BE MY, MY, MY INTEREST JUST TO BE ABLE TO, TO DISPEL ANY KIND OF WONDERS OUT THERE BECAUSE COMMUNITY MEMBERS, THE DECISION TONIGHT FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS WILL BE ABOUT THE WHAT IFS, RIGHT? AND THEY WILL ONLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE ALGORITHM THAT THEIR PHONE PROVIDES FOR SEARCHES AND INFORMATION OR WHATEVER GOOGLE IS, PREFERABLY REFERENCING THAT NIGHT. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. AND SO WE DON'T WANT FOLKS TO THINK WE MADE THE DECISION THAT IT LOOKS HARMFUL. SO IT WOULD BE IT WOULD BE BETTER IF THEY COULD BE HERE. I AGREE 100% BECAUSE THERE IS A LOT OF MISINFORMATION, ESPECIALLY AS TECHNOLOGY TAKES OVER. YOU KNOW, PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT BIG BROTHER OR, YOU KNOW, WE'RE TRACKING THE MAYOR WHEN HE GOES TO TO CASA GARCIA, YOU KNOW, AT THE END OF THE DAY, LAW ENFORCEMENT IN TEXAS, YOU KNOW, AND IN MAYNOR, WE'RE USING TOOLS TO SOLVE VIOLENT AND HEINOUS CRIMES. AND, YOU KNOW, SO WE WE KNOW THAT. YEAH. BUT, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE BRING IN THE THIRD PARTY AND I THINK IT'S IT, IT'LL BE IT'S GOOD ON OUR END TO BE ABLE TO ASK THEM THOSE QUESTIONS SO THAT THERE CAN BE CERTAINTY FROM THE COMMUNITY THAT, HEY, YOU KNOW, WE KNOW HOW THE POLICE OPERATES. THEY CAN LOOK THROUGH THE REPORTS AND SEE THAT YOU ALL ARE PEOPLE, FRIENDLY PEOPLE FIRST, YOU KNOW, BUT HOW DO WE A GOOD WAY TO ENSURE THAT THAT'S EXTENDED TO OUR THIRD PARTY SUPPORTERS, WHETHER IT BE OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OR IT'S SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, IT'S FOR THEM TO BE PRESENT TO JUST TO SAY, THIS IS WHAT TYPICALLY HAPPENS, THIS WHAT THIS IS WHAT COULD HAPPEN. AND THIS IS THE KIND OF WHAT WE'VE SEEN, HOW IT HAPPENS IN TEXAS OR SO ON. AND SO JUST TO BE ABLE TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS SO COUNCIL MEMBERS KNOW, KNOW WHAT, KNOW THE RISK GOING EITHER WAY. SURE. ABSOLUTELY. OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? I JUST WANT TO ADD, I AGREE I HAVE OTHER, I GUESS SPECIFIC TECHNOLOGY QUESTIONS AND ALSO. I GUESS QUESTIONS THAT WOULD KIND OF DISPEL SOME OF THE REVIEWS THAT THEY'VE HAD IN THE PAST. AND BECAUSE UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCE WHERE THE MAYOR WAS SAYING MAINE IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT, BUT COMPARED TO SOME OF THE OTHER PLACES THAT ARE OUT THERE.

AND SO JUST KIND OF KEEPING OUR GOOD REPUTATION. SURE. I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE THEM COME TALK TO US. WE WILL SCHEDULE THAT. WELL, WE NEED A MOTION FIRST FOR SURE. TO, TO GIVE US THAT DIRECTION.

SO ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR EMOTION? ASK MORE QUESTIONS. IF NOT, I'LL TAKE A MOTION. THE MOTION COULD BE TO APPROVE AS AS WRITTEN OR THE MOTION COULD BE TO POSTPONE TO THE MAY 22ND SECOND MEETING IN MAY. SECOND MEETING. SECOND MEETING MAY 20TH. SO THAT THE VENDOR CAN BE HERE. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL. I'D LIKE TO MAKE THE MOTION TO POSTPONE ITEM NUMBER 13 UNTIL THE MAY 20TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING, WHEN THE VENDOR CAN BE PRESENT TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER. IS THERE A SECOND I SECOND. SECOND BY COUNCILWOMAN HILL. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? NO QUESTIONS. ALL IN FAVOR OPPOSE.

MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. 05111. OPPOSE. YEAH. MAYOR PRO TEM HERE. ITEM NUMBER 14. THANK YOU.

[14. Consideration, discussion, and possible action regarding an agreement for additional services with Flock Safety.]

FLOCK SAFETY AGREEMENT. CONSIDERATION. DISCUSSION. POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING AN

[01:15:03]

AGREEMENT FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES FOR FLOCK SAFETY. YES, SIR. GOOD EVENING. MAYOR COUNCIL DENVER COLLINS, ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE. AS YOU'RE AWARE, WE'VE HAD SOME GOOD SUCCESS WITH OUR CURRENT FLOCK SYSTEM. WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR IN BUDGETED FOR IS ADDITIONAL SERVICES TO ADD ON TO OUR OUR CURRENT FLOCK STUFF. AS IT CURRENTLY STANDS, WE NEED A LICENSE PLATE TO GET A VEHICLE. AND WITH THE TWO ADDITIONAL SERVICES THAT WE'RE ASKING FOR, YOU CAN SIMPLY DESCRIBE A CAR, WHETHER IT BE A BIG FORD PICKUP TRUCK, BLACK IN COLOR WITH A BIG DEER HEAD STICKER IN THE IN THE BACK WINDOW, AND IT CAN SEARCH THAT.

AND THE SECOND ONE IS THE ENHANCED LPR PACKAGE, WHICH CAN NOT ONLY IDENTIFY A CERTAIN VEHICLE, IT CAN IDENTIFY OTHER VEHICLES THAT WERE ENGAGED IN ORGANIZED CRIME, SUCH AS HUMAN TRAFFICKING, DRUG SMUGGLING AND WHATNOT. AND IT CAN IDENTIFY WHEN THOSE CARS HAVE BEEN AT THE SAME PLACE OR IF THEY'VE BEEN SEEN AT CRIMINAL LOCATIONS. IF YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS, I DO HAVE TWO REPRESENTATIVES FROM FLOCK THAT CAN BETTER EXPLAIN IT. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO POINT OUT ON OUR DECISION TO DO THE ENHANCED. CAMERA CAPABILITIES WITH HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN MIND, WE RECEIVE SIGNIFICANT INTELLIGENCE ABOUT THE MOVEMENT OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING THROUGH OUR COMMUNITY AS WE CONNECT AUSTIN, ONE LARGE CITY, TO AN EXTREMELY LARGE CITY OF HOUSTON AND AREA INTELLIGENCE SEE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN HUMAN TRAFFICKING DURING LARGE EVENTS IN OUR NEIGHBORING CITY. SO DURING CODE-A AND DURING SOUTH, BY ALL OF THOSE INCIDENTS, THEY'RE SEEING THAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING VICTIMS ARE BEING BROUGHT INTO AUSTIN DURING THOSE EVENTS. AND THOSE INDIVIDUALS ARE BEING BROUGHT INTO AUSTIN THROUGH SOMEWHERE. AND IT'S MOST LIKELY GOING TO BE OUR HIGHWAY AND THE HIGHWAY TO THE SOUTH OF US THAT GOES THROUGH BACK DROP. SO THAT WAS ONE OF THE DECISIONS THAT LED US TO TO GO AFTER THE ENHANCED PACKAGE. QUESTIONS. COUNCIL MEMBERS, DID YOU ALL HAVE A CANNED PRESENTATION OR.

NO, NO, NO, NO PRESENTATION, JUST QUESTIONS. OKAY. HELLO COUNCIL MAYOR, GOOD TO SEE YOU AGAIN. SECRETARY. CONSTITUENTS OF MATTER. MY NAME IS IAN LESLIE. I'M THE REGIONAL PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGER FOR FLOCK. TRIED TO GET AS CLOSE OF A SUIT TO YOUR GUYS'S MUSTANG. READ AS I COULD GO. MUSTANGS. BUT NO. HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF DIALOG, YOU KNOW, THIS MORNING AROUND TECHNOLOGY, HOW FAST IT'S MOVING, A LOT OF THE MISINFORMATION OUT THERE. AND SO I WANT TO START WITH FLOCK TAKES TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY AT THE UTMOST. AND WE BELIEVE THAT COMMUNITY VALUES DOES NOT HAVE TO BE DISSEMINATED BY PUBLIC SAFETY OR COMMUNITY SAFETY. RIGHT. AND SO WITH THAT, I'LL OPEN IT UP TO ANY QUESTIONS. ON THE CONTRACT AMOUNT. SEE FOR YOURSELF. DO YOU HAVE A DISCOUNT? BUT I DON'T SEE ORIGINAL COST VERSUS WHAT'S BEING REQUESTED AS A DISCOUNT.

LOOKS LIKE THE PLATFORM AND ADD ONS ARE. THE TOTAL COST OF DISCOUNTS THAT WHAT WE'RE SEEING IS 51. I JUST DIDN'T SEE WHERE IT WAS 33 THEN WENT DOWN TO 28. I'M KEVIN CUTLER, I'M WITH FLOCK SAFETY AND JUST WANTED TO TALK ABOUT THIS. THE DISCOUNT THAT YOU ASKED ABOUT.

AND BECAUSE YOU GUYS ARE GOING WITH MORE THAN ONE SOFTWARE SOFTWARE UPGRADES, THERE'S A DISCOUNT AVAILABLE AS WELL. SO SO I GUESS WHAT HE'S ASKING IS IT SAYS THE THE COST IS 28,900.

IT SAYS DISCOUNTS AND THEN IT SAYS CONTRACT TOTAL. AND IT STILL SAYS 28 900. SO IT WAS DISCOUNTED 5000. IT WAS 33,000. AND YOU KNOW BEFORE THEN BEFORE THE 2890. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY.

OKAY. YEAH. SO I THINK I THINK WE WERE ALL PROBABLY JUST LOOKING FOR IT IN THE TOP PART WHERE IT HAD THE, THE, THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN, I GUESS 33 SOMETHING. AND THEN SEEING THE

[01:20:06]

FIVE, THE 5100 COMING OUT. OKAY. BUT THAT'S WHY I FIGURED IT WAS THAT WAS OUR FAULT. IT SHOULD SAY THE FULL COST AMOUNT WITH THE DISCOUNT TOTALING THE 2020 8900. SO THAT'S OUR MISPRINT.

CAN YOU TALK ABOUT THE SAFEGUARDS FROM OTHER AGENCIES OR THE SYSTEMS IN PLACE IN REGARDS TO HOW THE SYSTEM WORKS FOR SEARCHING AND THOSE KINDS OF THINGS? ABSOLUTELY, ABSOLUTELY. SO FIRST AND FOREMOST, THERE'S GUARDRAILS IMPLEMENTED AS THE TECHNOLOGY IS BEING DEVELOPED. GUARDRAILS SUCH AS CERTAIN SEARCH FILTERS ARE AUDITED, AND THEN GUARDRAILS OF EVEN WHAT YOU CAN TYPE IN. SO FOR INSTANCE, THIS IS HUMAN TRAFFICKING. IS IT DRUG TRAFFICKING, WHATEVER, PER YOUR POLICY, SAY IMMIGRATION CAME UP, RIGHT? IF THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS EXPLICITLY A NO GO IN YOUR POLICY THAT IS NOT EVEN ABLE TO BE SEARCHED IN THE IN THE SEARCH FILTER. AGAIN, THAT'S THAT'S MORE SO POLICIES POLICY. SO THE BIG THING HERE, AS THE TECHNOLOGY IS BEING DEVELOPED, WE BELIEVE THAT COMMUNITIES SHOULD HAVE AN INPUT ON THEIR POLICY. MAYNOR IS NOT THE SAME AS SAN MARCOS, AS AUSTIN AS ANY OTHER, YOU KNOW, SURROUNDING CITIES. RIGHT. AND SO WE GIVE YOUR AGENCY FULL CONTROL OVER THAT ALSO, AS WELL AS FAR AS AUTHORIZATION OR ACCESS, ONLY CERTAIN LIMITED CAPACITY OF ACCESS WITHIN YOUR AGENCY. AGAIN, GOING BACK TO POLICY CAN BE ADMINISTERED. SO IT'S NOT A EVERYBODY GETS ACCESS AND GETS TO DO WHATEVER THEY WANT THAT IS TRACKED AND AUDITED. SO SAY IF YOU GUYS SAID THREE SPECIFIC PEOPLE ONLY WERE REQUIRED ACCESS BASED OFF THEIR JOB DESCRIPTION, THAT'S WHAT THE POLICY WOULD BE. AND THEN EVEN AFTER THAT, WE'VE IMPLEMENTED MFA, MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION. SO THAT WAY IT'S KIND OF JUST A DOUBLE WHAMMY OF SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY AS WELL. AS FAR AS JUST I'M JUST GOING TO BRING THIS UP BECAUSE IT'S COME UP IN TOPICS TODAY. AS FAR AS FACIAL FACIAL FACIAL RECOGNITION DOES NOT IMPLEMENT FACIAL RECOGNITION IN ANY CAPACITY, NOR DOES ALPERS COLLECT ANY PERSONAL IDENTIFIABLE DATA. SO WHAT THAT MEANS RACE, GENDER, AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE ARE NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE CAPTURED IMAGE OF OF THE FLOCK CAMERA AS WELL AS. BY DEFAULT, ALL DATA IS DELETED AFTER 30 DAYS PER YOUR POLICY, BUT IT'S A STANDARD ACROSS ALL AGENCIES. I'LL ALSO TOUCH ON AS WELL. AS FAR AS DATA SHARING, I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT FEDERAL AGENCIES, STATE AGENCIES. AGAIN, YOU GUYS HAVE COMMUNITY CONTROL ON WHO HAS ACCESS TO YOUR DATA AND WHO SHARES THAT. IF YOU GUYS DO NOT WANT FEDERAL FEDERAL AGENCIES TO HAVE ACCESS, THEY WILL NOT HAVE FEDERAL ACCESS. IF YOU DO NOT WANT THE CITY OF AUSTIN TO HAVE ACCESS, THEY WILL NOT HAVE ACCESS PER YOUR POLICY. AND THEN FOR IF YOU DO SHARE, DECIDE TO SHARE YOUR YOUR DATA WITH SURROUNDING AGENCIES, GUESS WHAT? ALL OF THAT IS AUDITED SO I CAN GO IN AND SEE SPECIFICALLY WHO ACCESSED IT AT WHAT TIME AND FOR WHAT REASON WAS IT A DRUG TRAFFICKING CASE? WAS IT A HUMAN TRAFFICKING CASE? YOU KNOW, WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF THAT? AND THEN AGAIN, THAT DATA IS DELETED AFTER 30 DAYS.

IS THAT DATA REPORTABLE TO US? ABSOLUTELY. SO YOU GUYS AND WE CAN WORK WITH YOUR AGENCY DIRECTLY WITH OUR CUSTOMER SUCCESS MANAGER. WE HAVE WE MAKE AVAILABLE TO ALL AGENCIES A TRANSPARENCY PORTAL THAT IS A COMMUNITY FACING PORTAL, WHICH CLEARLY STATES YOUR POLICY, HOW MANY CAMERAS YOU HAVE, HOW MANY HITS, WHAT IT'S BEEN USED FOR, YOU KNOW, HOW MANY CASES OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING, DRUG TRAFFICKING, WHATEVER STOPS ALL OF THAT IS ARTICULATED, WHO YOU SHARE WITH THE DOS AND DON'TS OF THE TECHNOLOGY. AGAIN, ALL OF THAT MISINFORMATION IS OUT THERE. IT'S KIND OF DISPELLED WITH YOUR GUYS'S TRANSPARENCY PORTAL. WE'VE ALREADY HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH DEPUTY IN CHIEF ABOUT IMPLEMENTING THAT FOR YOU GUYS. THANK YOU. HAS THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE HAVE Y'ALL TALKED ABOUT OR OR CAN Y'ALL BRING THIS UP IN Y'ALL'S NEXT MEETING JUST TO RUN THROUGH KIND OF THE, THE USE OF THAT INFORMATION? YEAH.

BEFORE WE GENERALLY, WE TRY TO ALWAYS MEET WITH THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE BEFORE WE PUT ANYTHING ON THE AGENDA. SO ON OUR LAST MEETING LAST MONTH, I DON'T REMEMBER THE EXACT DATE, BUT WE DID HAVE BOTH CLEARVIEW AI AND FLOC ON THAT AGENDA TO DISCUSS. OKAY. YEAH. NO, I MEAN, MORE SO ABOUT THE THE POTENTIAL OF JUST TO WORK OUT THE DETAILS OF THE REPORTING AND THE TRANSPARENCY, THOSE THINGS TO BRING BACK TO COUNCIL. SURE. WHAT WE WOULD MOST LIKELY DO IS JUST CREATE A SECTION WITHIN OUR MONTHLY REPORT THAT GIVES THE DATA THAT Y'ALL WANT TO SEE.

OKAY, OKAY. THAT'S MY QUESTIONS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I HAVE A QUESTION IN REGARDS TO TRACKING, MAKING SURE, HEY, MARIA GOES TO HEB 17 TIMES IN A WEEK. LIKE THE CAMERA'S RIGHT THERE NEXT TO WHAT DO YOU LIKE? IS THAT SOMETHING THAT'S LOOKED AT OR HOW DOES THAT INFORMATION GO? LIKE AM I BEING TRACKED? ABSOLUTELY, ABSOLUTELY. THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. THAT'S AT THE UTMOST RECENT CONVERSATIONS. RIGHT. AND SO WE HAVE, I THINK, AS OF 60 FEDERAL CASES THAT

[01:25:05]

UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORT THAT FLOCK AND LPR CAMERAS DO NOT VIOLATE YOUR FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

AND SO THAT GOES BACK TO WHAT I SAID ABOUT PERSONAL IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION. I CAN'T TELL IF YOU'RE DRIVING THE CAR, I CAN'T DRIVE, I CAN'T TELL IF YOUR SON'S DRIVING THE CAR. NONE OF THAT INFORMATION IS RELEASED. RIGHT. ALSO, I THINK AS WELL, I THINK AS OF THE DATE, DON'T CALL ME ON THIS. I THINK MARCH 17TH, THAT WAS THE MOST RECENT CASE THAT THAT CAME IN THE FAVOR OF A PR USE IN THE FIFTH DISTRICT, WHICH TEXAS SITS IN. AND SO AGAIN, VERY VALID QUESTION IN TERMS OF, YOU KNOW, THE DATA BEING COLLECTED, WHERE IS IT GOING IN THOSE COURT CASES, NORFOLK AND NORFOLK, VIRGINIA, SPECIFICALLY, AND ALPR IS SET UP AT THE INGRESS AND EGRESS OF A CITY, RIGHT. SO IT'S NOT SPYING ON YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY AND YOUR WINDOWS, SEEING MAYOR GO TO THE GYM. YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT AT THOSE AT THOSE THOSE POINTS THERE. AND SO BECAUSE OF THAT, I THINK, I THINK IT ONLY CAPTURES ABOUT 5% OF YOUR MOVEMENTS. SO IF IT'S AT THE INGRESS AND EGRESS OF A CITY, YOU PASS THE CAMERA AND YOU GO, RIGHT, I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU'RE GOING FROM THERE. I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU'RE GOING.

I DON'T KNOW WHETHER YOU TURN RIGHT OR TURN LEFT. I ONLY KNOW IF YOU COME BACK OUT OF THE CITY, AND THEN I'LL ADD IN TWO AGAIN, AS FAR AS LOCATION OF THE CAMERAS, YOU GUYS HAVE COMMUNITY CONTROL ON THAT. WORKING WITH YOUR AGENCY ON WHERE WOULD BE THE BEST PLACE THAT IT WOULDN'T INFRINGE OR MAKE ANYBODY FEEL UNCOMFORTABLE. YOU GUYS HAVE THAT CONTROL AS WELL. ABSOLUTELY. GREAT QUESTION. OTHER QUESTIONS? IF THERE ARE NO OTHER QUESTIONS, I ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

SO I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU. MAYBE THERE YOU MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT.

THE UPGRADES 30 DAYS AND THEN IT DELETES. YES, MA'AM. MAYBE IT'S THE CHIEF'S QUESTION ALSO BECAUSE. BUT YOU SAID IT'S BECAUSE YOU SAID THAT THERE WERE RESTRICTIONS. SO IF YOU WANTED TO HAVE RESTRICTIONS WHERE YOU ONLY. YOU DON'T HAVE ACCESS FOR OTHER CITIES AROUND THE. YOU TO BE ABLE TO ACCESS YOURS. BECAUSE THAT'S ONE PART OF MY QUESTION. JUST KIND OF CONFIRMING THAT. BUT DO WE KNOW THE LEVEL OF, I GUESS, WHAT THE OTHER CITIES HAVE OF THEIR ABILITY? LIKE, DO THEY HAVE THE, THE FIVE PART PACKAGE OR DO THEY JUST HAVE THE LITTLE ONE AND THEY KIND OF RELY ON US? YEAH. I DON'T KNOW WHAT OTHER CITIES HAVE AS FAR AS THE LEVELS INTO FLOCK TECHNOLOGY. I DO KNOW THAT ELGIN IS VERY FLOCK HEAVY AND, AND THEY MAY BE ABLE TO SPEAK ON WHAT THEY HAVE OR HOW MANY CAMERAS. PFLUGERVILLE IS ALSO A HEAVY USER. SO AND WE DO SHARE INFORMATION WITH BOTH OF THOSE AGENCIES BECAUSE CRIMINALS DON'T KNOW CITY LIMITS, RIGHT? SO A LOT OF TIMES IF THEY'RE BREAKING THE LAW OR BREAKING INTO CARS IN PFLUGERVILLE, THEY'RE DOING THE SAME IN MAYNOR AND ELGIN. SO I DON'T I CAN'T SPEAK TO THE LEVEL OF WHAT THEY'RE USING. I THINK ELGIN IS MORE IN A SITUATION WHERE WE ARE WHERE WE HAVE HIGHWAY 290 COMING THROUGH US, AND THAT IS A MAJOR, MAJOR OBSTACLE FOR US IN BRINGING CRIMINALS THROUGH OR INTO OR OUT OF THAT. WE COULD BE CATCHING IF THEY'RE COMMITTING CRIME HERE IN MAYNOR, PFLUGERVILLE, THEY DO HAVE INTERSTATE 130, BUT THAT'S, YOU KNOW, GOING THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION. AND AND I DON'T KNOW HOW, HOW MUCH THEY UTILIZE OR IF THEY EVEN HAVE CAMERAS ON 130 TEX-DOT HAS COME THROUGH THE STATE AND TXDOT USES FLOCK THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF TEXAS. BUT AGAIN, THE OTHER AGENCIES, I DON'T KNOW WHAT LEVEL THAT THEY THEY USE THAT WE GET THEIR DATA AND SOME OF THEM TAKE OUR DATA. AND I JUST WANT TO JUST WANT TO ADD ON THAT FOR CLARITY, ALL OF THAT IS AUDITED AND CAN BE SEEN AGAIN, WHO ACCESS YOUR DATA, WHAT TIME FOR WHAT REASON. SO I'M GUESSING THIS IS MAYBE PART TWO OF THAT. SO LIKE IF WE ONLY HAVE, I WANT TO CALL IT BASIC, BUT IF WE HAVE THE BASIC PACKAGE WHERE WE CAN JUST IDENTIFY THE LICENSE PLATE, BUT PFLUGERVILLE HAD THE, THE ADVANCE. SO YOU CAN SEE EVEN THE COLOR OF THE CAR AND THE OTHER LITTLE SPECIAL FEATURES, IF THEY WERE CONNECTING WITH US TO SEE IF THE CAR CAME OUR DIRECTION, WOULD WE BE ABLE TO IT WOULD NARROW IT DOWN OR WOULD LIKE ALL OF US, WOULD WE HAVE LIKE TEMPORARY ACCESS TO

[01:30:03]

BE ABLE TO SEE THOSE FEATURES AND NARROW IT DOWN? OR WOULD IT STILL BE WE'RE ONLY LIMITED TO JUST THE LICENSE PLATE, LIKE, BECAUSE THAT COULD GO BOTH WAYS WHERE IT'S LIKE, WELL, YOU'RE NOT MUCH HELP SINCE YOU DIDN'T UPGRADE YOUR PLAN OR YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? YEAH, I THINK I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. YES. SO WE'RE LIMITED TO THE, THE PROGRAM OF WHAT WE PAY FOR.

SO I GUESS THE QUESTION FOR FLOCK IS IF ONE OF OUR CAMERAS CAPTURES SOMETHING PFLUGERVILLE IS LOOKING FOR AND THEY PAY FOR THE PREMIUM PACKAGE, DO THEY GET TO SEARCH OURS FOR AT THE PREMIUM LEVEL? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING? THAT'S A QUESTION FOR THEM. THAT THAT IS THAT IS A GREAT QUESTION. AND I'LL BE I'LL BE FRANK WITH YOU. I DO NOT KNOW. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THAT I'VE GOT THAT QUESTION. SO THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. AND I CAN DEFINITELY DO SOME RESEARCH AND GET THAT ANSWER FOR YOU. FOR SURE. I WILL, I WILL LEAN ON AND THIS WAS THIS WAS SAID BEFORE IT BEING AN INVESTIGATIVE TOOL. AND SO THE CAPTURING OF THE LICENSE PLATE OR EVEN THE CAR DOESN'T NECESSARILY ALWAYS DELIVER INTENT. AND I DON'T KNOW WHO'S DRIVING THE CAR IS IT IS IT, IS IT, IS IT A MOM ON THE WAY HOME FROM WORK? OR IS HER TEAM OUT? YOU KNOW, GYRATING YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? SO THERE'S STILL PER YOUR POLICY, OTHER INVESTIGATIVE MEASURES THAT WOULD GO INTO FACILITATING THAT. QUESTIONS OR A MOTION. MAYOR COUNCIL WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE AGREEMENT FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES WITH FLOCK SAFETY AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE ORDER FORM. WELL, MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MORENO, IS THERE A SECOND I SECOND? SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM HERE. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? I HAVE A QUESTION. IF IT'S NOT APPROVED TODAY, IS THERE A TIMELINE ON THIS ONE ALSO OR A PENALTY FOR THE UPGRADE? I DON'T BELIEVE SO. I THINK THAT THEY WILL ALWAYS WANT US TO BE A CUSTOMER AND TO BUY ADDITIONAL SERVICES. SO I DON'T THINK THAT THERE'S ANY PENALTY IN IN WAITING. THE DRAWBACK TO WAITING IS IT'S A TOOL THAT, YOU KNOW, WE CAN'T UTILIZE IN, IN THE INVESTIGATIONS THAT WE'RE DOING. THAT'S THE ONLY DRAWBACK OF THE WAITING THIS FOR JUST THE ADDITIONAL SERVICES. THIS IS FOR THE WHOLE CONTRACT, RIGHT? THIS IS JUST FOR THE ADDITIONAL SERVICES OUTLINED IN THE SUMMARY FORM. OKAY. AND THEN WHAT'S THE COST OF THE FULL THE ANNUAL THAT WE'RE PAYING. YEAH. I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE, WHAT WHAT OUR ANNUAL I SHOULD BE AS WE'RE DOING BUDGET RIGHT NOW, BUT WE'RE LOOKING THAT UP RIGHT NOW. OKAY. IT WAS PROBABLY LIKE THREE YEARS AGO, FOUR YEARS AGO. IT'S BEEN A LITTLE WHILE. 23. YES, YES. 2023. SO THE YEAR WAS IT AFTER THAT? NO, IT WAS DURING THAT TIME DURING THAT, BUT IT WASN'T SET UP YET.

TALKED ABOUT HER CAR WHEN SHE GOT, WHEN IT GOT STOLEN AND IT GOT IT WAS HIT ON ON A FLAT CAMERA, RIGHT. YEAH. SAME THING WITH CITY COUNCIL MEMBER IN KYLE, TEXAS. THEY HAD THEIR VEHICLE STOLEN AND THEY HAD FLOCK AND THEY PICKED IT UP WITHIN TWO HOURS. SO. SO MAINERS CURRENT CONTRACT WITH FLOCK IS 30,000. AND THEN WITH THE ADDITIONAL 28 NINE, THAT WOULD TURN IT INTO 58 NINE TOTAL. SO. THANK YOU SIR.

AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. 168 ITEM PAGE 168 FISCAL IMPACT SAYS YES.

BUDGET ITEM FOR 2526. OTHER QUESTIONS. DID THAT ANSWER? DID YOU GET YOUR ANSWER? YES. IT WOULDN'T CHANGE THE DISCOUNT IF IT WAS APPROVED IN TWO MORE WEEKS OR BY MAY 1ST. OR YOU OR

[01:35:12]

YOU WANTING TO ASK COUNCIL MEMBERS ABOUT THAT? OR ARE YOU JUST INQUIRING FOR YOURSELF? I WAS INQUIRING FOR MYSELF JUST TO SEE IF BECAUSE I, I GUESS I DID WANT TO KNOW, LIKE THE QUESTION THAT I ASKED ABOUT THE BE ABLE TO USING THE PACKAGE, DEPENDING ON WHAT THE UPGRADES WERE. THAT'S ALL. IF THERE WAS TIME, IF THAT WAS SUFFICIENT TIME OR IF IT WAS, IF IT HAPPENED BEFORE THEN, AND MAYBE IT COULD BE APPROVED OUTSIDE OF THIS. IF IT WAS, I DON'T KNOW.

THAT'S LEGAL. BUT IF IT IF IT WAS NOT RECIPROCAL, YOU WOULD WANT TO NOT DO IT. YEAH. MAYBE ASK THE RIGHT. SO IF THEY, IF IF WE DID NOT HAVE THE ADVANCED FEATURES IN PFLUGERVILLE, WE'RE STILL ABLE TO HAVE THE ADVANCED FEATURES. THEN YOU WOULD NOT WANT TO APPROVE IT. BECAUSE YOU WOULD FEEL LIKE THE FEATURES THAT WE HAVE NOW ARE FINE. IS THAT IS THAT YES OR THAT'S A NO.

IT WOULD DEPEND IF THE ADVANCED FEATURES WITHOUT THE ADVANCED FEATURE, IF THEY'RE ADVANCED FEATURES, WOULD STILL BE ABLE TO ALLOW THEM ALLOW US TO BE A BENEFIT TO THEM. SO BECAUSE THEY HAVE ADVANCED FEATURES, WE WOULD BE ABLE TO SEE THAT, SEE WHAT THEY SEE. IF ONE OF THEIR VEHICLES CAME THROUGH, OR YOU MEAN THE REVERSE. YES, I THINK I CONFUSED, BUT YES, I THINK IT WAS JUST WHETHER OR NOT THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO WITH IF WE DIDN'T HAVE OUR ADVANCED FEATURES, WOULD THEY STILL BE ABLE TO. USE BE ABLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF WHAT WE HAVE FROM THE CAMERA FROM. YEAH. AND THEN IF SO, I GUESS THE, I GUESS THE MAYBE THE FIRST QUESTION TO ASK IS, DOES THE CAMERA TAKE, DOES THE CAMERA IN ITS CURRENT STATE ALREADY COLLECT ALL OF THE INFORMATION? AND IF THAT'S THE CASE, THEN WE'RE EITHER TURNING ON OUR ACCESS TO SEE IT OR NOT.

IS THAT CORRECT? IS THAT MAKE SENSE? I WOULD, I WOULD SAY THE, THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE THE TWO PACKAGES IS THE ALPR CAMERA IS MEANT TO CAPTURE THE LICENSE PLATE. AND THEN WITH THE UPGRADED SYSTEM, YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE MORE OF A DEFINITIVE READ. CHEVY CRUZE RP812. THAT WAY YOU'RE NOT. JUST THAT WAY, IT'S MORE EFFECTIVE. SO YOU'RE NOT LOOKING FOR TEN RED CHEVY CRUZES BECAUSE THERE MIGHT BE A, YOU KNOW, DOES IS IT DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? RIGHT NOW IT'S JUST A LICENSE PLATE READER. CORRECT. AND WHICH MEANS IF I TAKE A LICENSE PLATE OFF AND PUT IT ON ANOTHER VEHICLE, IS THIS GOING TO SEE THE LICENSE PLATE? IT'S NO, IT'S BECAUSE IT'S IF YOU'RE MOVING THE LICENSE PLATE, THEN NO. AND SO THAT'S WHY THERE'S ADAPTIVE FEATURES, NIGHT NIGHT VISION THINGS ON, ON OUR CURRENT ONE ON OUR CURRENT SYSTEM. RIGHT NOW, IT ONLY READS THE LICENSE PLATE, I BELIEVE SO, YES. AND SO IF I TAKE A LICENSE PLATE OFF THE TRUCK AND PUT IT ON THE CAR, IT'S GOING TO READ THE LICENSE PLATE ONLY. IT'S NOT GOING TO SAY IT'S A CAR. CORRECT. ON THE ENHANCED FEATURES. ARE WE ADDING NEW HARDWARE TO THE SYSTEM? YOU'RE ADDING THE CAR MAKE AND MODEL. OKAY. BUT IT'S HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE THAT WE'RE ADDING JUST SOFTWARE, SOFTWARE, SOFTWARE. SO THE, THE NEW SOFTWARE THEN IS GOING TO LOOK AT MORE THAN JUST, IT'S GOING TO ACTIVATE THE CAMERA TO BE ABLE TO CAPTURE COLOR, COLOR, MAKE MODEL AS WELL AS IS THERE A BUMPER STICKER ON THE BACK AND ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT? IS THERE A SPECIFIC THING ON THE LEFT REAR TIRE? ALL OF THAT WILL BE ABLE TO BE IDENTIFIED, WHICH ALLOWS YOU TO BE MORE EFFECTIVE. EXACTLY. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? OKAY. AND THEN FROM THERE, SO IT IS. SO IT'S NOT HARDWARE. ITS SOFTWARE SOFTWARE THEN UPGRADE NOW COLLECTS MORE FIELDS. SO IF PFLUGERVILLE HAS IT, MY ASSUMPTION WOULD BE IF THEY HAVE THE ADVANCED FEATURES, THEY WILL SEE WHATEVER THEY WOULD GET TO SEE. THE SOFTWARE GOES INTO THE CAMERA, IT'LL BE AUTOMATED, AUTOMATICALLY UPDATED, BUT IT GOES IT'S GOING INTO THE CAMERA, INTO THE EXISTING CAMERA. YES. SO MY ASSUMPTION WOULD BE IF THE

[01:40:03]

SOFTWARE DOESN'T GO INTO THE CAMERA, YOU JUST GET THAT CAMERA, JUST A READER. IF YOU NEED SOFTWARE TO OPEN IT UP TO DO MORE, THEN THE ADVANCED FEATURES OF FUJIFILM WON'T MATTER HERE BECAUSE THE CAMERA DOESN'T GET THE SOFTWARE UPGRADE. EXACTLY. YEAH. SO WE WE WON'T BE A GOOD PARTNER. AND JUST TO CLARIFY, PFLUGERVILLE DOES HAVE THE ADVANCED. ELGIN DOES NOT. ELGIN DOES NOT. OKAY. THAT THAT MAKE MORE SENSE NOW. WHAT IF EVERYBODY EVERYBODY GOT.

SO TECHNICALLY ALL THE CAMERAS WOULD NEED TO GET THE. THE CAMERAS WOULD RECEIVE THE SOFTWARE UPDATE CORRECT. YOU. OKAY? ALL RIGHT. WE GOT A MOTION ON THE FLOOR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? NO. ALL RIGHT, WE'LL TAKE A VOTE. ALL IN FAVOR, OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. THANK YOU ALL. THANK YOU. COUNCIL. ITEM NUMBER 15. CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION

[15. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a partnership between Evolution of Health and the City of Manor for the June Manor Community Day and 5K.]

AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE PARTNERSHIP WITH THE EVOLUTION OF HEALTH AND THE CITY OF MAYNARD FOR JUNE MAYNARD COMMUNITY DAY IN FIVE K. COME ON UP, SIR. AND MA'AM. THAT'S RIGHT. COME ON UP. I THINK HE SAID YOU FIRST, STEPHANIE. I THINK THAT'S WHAT THEY SAID EARLIER. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. TODAY I HAVE DEREK WHITE WITH EVOLUTION OF HEALTH TO PROPOSE THE PARTNERSHIP WITH HIS EVENT JUNE MAYNARD COMMUNITY AND FIVE K. THE DATE FOR THIS EVENT IS JUNE 6TH FROM 8 A.M. TO 12 P.M. AT TIMMERMAN PARK. THIS WILL INCLUDE VENDORS, MARKET AND FOOD VENDORS, KIDS ACTIVITIES AND OF COURSE, THE FIVE K. AND WE ALSO CAN TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THAT IF YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. I HAVE A QUESTION. YES, MA'AM. I HAVE A VERY ACTIVE YOUNG GENTLEMAN THAT WOULD LOVE TO RUN THE FIVE K. IS THAT POSSIBLE OR DOES HE IS HE RESTRICTED TO THAT ONE K? GOOD EVENING. THANKS FOR THE QUESTION. YOU CAN RUN IN THE ACTUAL FIVE K IF YOU LIKE HIM TO. THANK. YEAH I WAS I WAS THINKING THE THERE WAS A LITTLE KID THAT TAUNTED ME IN ONE OF THOSE FIVE K'S. AS HE CONTINUED TO MOVE FASTER AROUND THE FIVE K. IT WASN'T. LAST YEAR WAS THE. I THINK THE YEAR BEFORE I TOOK A PICTURE WITH HIM. YEAH. SO YEAH, THEY CAN GET IN THERE, MAKE US ALL LOOK BAD. YEAH.

OTHER QUESTIONS COUNCIL MEMBERS. I KNOW STEPHANIE, AT THE LAST MEETING, ONE OF THE TASKS WAS YOU WERE GOING TO FIND ADDITIONAL VENDORS, TEN VENDORS. WERE YOU ABLE TO DO THAT? YES.

ONCE WE PUT OUT A VENDOR FLIER, WE'LL BE ABLE TO START GETTING THE VENDORS THAT WE WOULD WANT AND START SIFTING THROUGH THE SELECTION. I SEE ONE OF THOSE RESPONSIBILITIES WILL YOU'LL BE SOMEONE WILL BE OVERSEEING THE VENDORS FOR THE EVENT. YES. SO I'LL OVERSEE THE VENDORS. I KNOW MR. WHITE WILL HAVE SOME VENDORS THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO ADD ON. SO WE WILL WORK TOGETHER ON ON GETTING THOSE VENDORS TO THIS EVENT. THANK YOU. WERE WE ABLE TO GET FIRE THERE OR ARE THEY STILL LIKE ON CALL? YES, I'M WORKING WITH CASSIDY TO GET TRAVIS COUNTY EMS. JUST BECAUSE OUR SD 12 DOES NOT DO THE ON SITE STANDBY TENT. SO I'M WORKING WITH TRAVIS COUNTY TO GET THAT STANDBY TENT THAT THEY'LL BE ON PROPERTY AND WON'T LEAVE. OKAY.

THANK I'M NOT SURE WHAT THEY WOULD OR WOULDN'T DO, BUT MAYBE ASK SAINT DAVID'S AND SEE IF THEY HAVE SOMETHING THAT THEY CAN MAYBE CONNECT TO. AND THEN. WHAT WAS THE OTHER GROUP? MAYNARD HEALTH CLINIC? THAT'S THE GROUP, RIGHT. MAIN HEALTH CLINIC. DOCTOR KAREN SMITH.

YEAH. MAYBE MAIN HEALTH CLINIC DOCTOR KAREN SMITH BECAUSE THEY THEY VOLUNTEER AND THEY DO FREE CLINIC HEALTH. SO MAYBE THEY CAN ALSO BE ON SITE FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES AS WELL. IN CASE, YOU KNOW, THERE IS THAT PEOPLE HAVE TO GO. AND JUST TO NOTE, NEXT TIME YOU TALK TO CASSIDY, JUST LET HER KNOW THE. BEING ABLE TO RUN THROUGH THE THE FIRE HYDRANT AT THE END. YES. WAS

[01:45:02]

LIKE A BIG DEAL BECAUSE IT WAS VERY HOT AND IT WAS A GOOD REFRESHING, YOU KNOW, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF WE MIGHT BE IN A WATER CRISIS OR SOMETHING. I DON'T KNOW, BUT YOU KNOW, I'LL LET HER KNOW. YEAH. THAT'S ALLOWABLE AND REASONABLE. I WILL LET HER KNOW. YEAH, I AGREE AS SOMEBODY WHO RAN IT IS IS HOT. I DON'T KNOW IF THE HEALTH CLINIC WOULD BE ABLE TO HELP BECAUSE THE SIX WILL BE THERE. THEY'RE THEY DO THEIR CLINIC ONCE A MONTH ON THE FIRST SATURDAY. AND THAT IS THE FIRST SATURDAY FOR JUNE. SO THEY MAY NOT BE A RESOURCE.

OKAY. WE CAN ALSO, I CAN SEE IF I CAN FIND SOME CONTACTS FOR PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC OR OTHERS IF NECESSARY. IF THE EMS THING WON'T WORK OUT, WE'LL REACH OUT TO ANY OF THE CLINICS HERE. SO IF YOU HAVE ANY OF THE CONTACTS, FEEL FREE TO SEND THAT TO ME AND WE'LL REACH OUT.

IN ADDITION TO TRAVIS COUNTY. OKAY. OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS. IS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR VOLUNTEERS? ABSOLUTELY. WE NEED SOME ATTESTATIONS. ARE WE? WE'RE GOOD. YES WE ARE. THERE'S DEFINITELY A LOT OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR VOLUNTEERS AT THE STATIONS. IT'S NO SURPRISE THAT WE MAY GET 50 PEOPLE WHO SIGNED UP TO VOLUNTEER, BUT MAYBE TEN PEOPLE SHOW UP. IF YOU GO TO THE EVENT SITE, THERE IS AN OPTION ON THERE TO VOLUNTEER, AND THERE'S A BACKUP LINK IN CASE THAT ONE DOESN'T WORK. THAT WILL TAKE YOU TO A GOOGLE FORM WHERE YOU JUST INPUT YOUR NAME AND THEN YOU RECEIVE AN EMAIL LATER ON. JUST LET YOU KNOW. SO YOU HAVE TWO DIFFERENT OPTIONS TO SIGN UP TO VOLUNTEER. I DO ASK THAT YOU ONLY IF YOU'RE ABLE TO GET THROUGH ONE, DON'T SIGN UP ON THE OTHER. DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? CAN WE LET. JUST SERVE KNOW? OH YEAH. THAT'S AN ORGANIZATION HERE. MARGARET. MISS MARGARET AND. YEAH.

MARGARET, I CAN I CAN GIVE YOU ABOUT FROM JUST SURF. JUST SERVE. YEAH. YES, I'VE SPOKEN WITH HER. OKAY, COOL. YEAH. SHE'LL BE A GOOD PERSON FOR YOU TO MEET. SHE ALWAYS HAS VOLUNTEERS, AND SHE ALWAYS LIKES TO VOLUNTEER. AND THEN SHE CONNECTS WITH THE THE THE CHURCH OF LATTER DAY SAINTS THAT'S IN THE AREA. AND THEY DO IT. THEY, THEY WOULD VOLUNTEER AS WELL. AND MANIFESTATION OR WHATEVER. SO GOOD PEOPLE TO KNOW. AND. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. WELL, I'LL ENTERTAIN ANOTHER QUESTION OR A MOTION. MAYOR COUNCIL LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE A PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN EVOLUTION OF HEALTH DEREK WHITE AND THE CITY OF MAYNARD FOR THE JUNE MAYNARD COMMUNITY DAY AND FIVE K MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER MORENO. IS THERE A SECOND I SECOND. SECOND BY COUNCILWOMAN MEXICO. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? NO QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION. ALL IN FAVOR OPPOSE. MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. ALRIGHT.

THANK YOU ALL. GOOD TO SEE YOU. THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH. YEAH. HAVE A GOOD NIGHT. YOU TOO.

[16. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to award a Construction Contract for the Gregg Lane Ground Storage Tank and Pressurization Facility to TTE, LLC in the base and alternate bid items amount of $4,619,808.70]

APPRECIATE IT. ALL RIGHT, COUNCIL MEMBERS, NUMBER 16. CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR GREG LANE. GROUND STORAGE TANK AND PRESSURIZATION FACILITY TO T E LLC IN THE BASE AND ALTERNATE BID ITEMS. AMOUNT OF $4,619,808.70. GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING MAYOR COUNCIL. I'M VERY GRATEFUL TO BE HERE TODAY TO BE ABLE TO ASK FOR THIS AWARD OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE GREG LANE GROUND STORAGE PRESSURIZED FACILITY. WITH T T LLC, THE ADDITIONAL GROUND STORAGE CAPACITY SUPPORTS THE CITY'S COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS. IT ALSO WILL WILL MEET THE STORAGE REQUIREMENTS.

BASED ON THE CURRENT CITY'S NEEDS AND THE PROJECTED GROWTH, THE BOOSTER STATION WILL ALSO HELP INCREASE THE PRESSURE ON THE NORTH OF THE US. 290 ALSO ATTACHED. HOPEFULLY YOU ALL GOT THE MAPS THAT I WAS ABLE TO KIND OF SHOW. THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE IT. SO YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THIS IS THE NEW HAVEN SUBDIVISION. THIS IS RIGHT. THAT'S THE PROPERTY THEY DONATED FOR US. THAT'S WHAT WE'VE BEEN WAITING FOR TO ACTUALLY GET THE TO ACQUIRE THE LAND TO GET THE BOOSTER STATION GOING. IT'S PRETTY MUCH RIGHT BEFORE THE BRIDGE. AND YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THERE'S AN AERIAL MAP ON THE TOP OF KIND OF WHERE THAT GREG LANE BOOSTER STATION IS GOING TO BE AT. CAN YOU GO TO THE NEXT ONE? AND THAT IS ACTUALLY THE AREA THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE PUTTING. THAT'S THAT'S THE CITY'S PROPERTY. NOW THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE PUTTING THE GREG LANE GROUND STORAGE TANK, THERE WILL BE SOME EARTHWORK THAT WE'LL HAVE TO DO TO LEVEL OUT, AND WE WILL BE ABLE TO GET AN ENTRANCE RIGHT THERE WHERE THE COVE IS, AND HOPEFULLY WE'LL HAVE AN INTEREST. ALSO, I THINK THERE WAS GOING TO BE ONE AROUND GREG

[01:50:02]

LANE. WELL, THE NEW BECAUSE WE'RE TYING IN WOULD BE TRAVIS COUNTY. OKAY. AND WE DIDN'T WANT TO GET INTO IT OFF THE BRIDGE. I THINK YOU GOT TO GET ON CAMERA AND SAY YOUR NAME AND STUFF ON THE MIC FOR THIS. AND IF YOU GO TO THE NEXT MAP, YOU CAN KIND OF SHOW, I WANTED TO GET A KIND OF A OVERVIEW OF WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE AS FAR AS PRESSURE. SO YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THE BLUE AREA WITH OUR NEW GREG MANOR GROUND STORAGE TANK. WE'VE ALREADY SEEN US, YOU KNOW, A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF PRESSURE ALREADY BUILDING UP IN OUR SYSTEM, BUT THIS WILL HELP FEED ALL OF OUR EAST. AND IT WILL BE A CAPACITY OF FOUR 500,000 GALLONS OF STORAGE.

THIS IS GOING TO ALSO COMPILING WITH THE GREG MANOR GROUND STORAGE TANK. IT'S GOING TO ALSO JUST HELP THE WHOLE ENTIRE SYSTEM ITSELF. AS FAR AS PRESSURE. AND FLOW AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS. WOULD IT BE ABLE TO BE. IS IT GOING TO. WHAT TYPE OF IMPACT IS GOING TO HAVE ON GREG LANE? IN REGARDS TO. IS THE. IS IT FAR ENOUGH AWAY FROM THE ROAD OR WOULD THEY HAVE TO HAVE LIKE, YOU KNOW, CONES AND STUFF LIKE THAT? SO IT SHOULD BE FAR ENOUGH AWAY.

IT'S ALSO RIGHT, GOING TO BE KIND OF RIGHT IN LINE WITH OUR, OUR WATER LINE GOES ALREADY. WE ACTUALLY RECEIVE OUR WATER JUST A LITTLE TO THE WEST OF THAT FROM OUR, FROM OUR WHOLESALE PROVIDER RIGHT NOW. SO IT'S KIND OF IN LINE. AND THAT WILL ACTUALLY GO STRAIGHT TO OUR ELEVATED STORAGE TANK THAT WE HAVE. OKAY. OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS. COUNCIL MEMBERS, CAN YOU SPEAK ON A LITTLE BIT ABOUT TLC, WHERE THEY'RE FROM AND WHAT KIND OF OTHER PROJECTS THEY'VE DONE? YES, SIR. I DID HAVE GBA. THEY LOOKED AT THE BACKGROUND AND DOUBLE CHECKED.

WE ACTUALLY EVEN GAVE A CALL. WE KNOW THEY DID SOME WORK WITH A COUPLE, ACTUALLY A WATER CORP, THE WATER CORPORATION THAT WE'RE KIND OF SHARE SHARE LINES WITH. I SAY LINES, IT'S MORE AREA THAT WE'RE DOING. THEY'VE DONE A COUPLE OF OTHER SPOTS AND THEY DID HAVE A GOOD RAPPORT. AS FAR AS EXACTLY WHERE THEY'RE FROM. I'M NOT YOU KNOW. MARBLE FALLS, I THINK.

YEAH, THEY'RE BASED OUT OF MARBLE FALLS. THANK YOU. AND I CAN'T SAY THAT I'VE ACTUALLY WORKED WITH THEM ON A PREVIOUS PROJECT, NOT FOR MINAR, BUT FOR SOMEBODY ELSE. AND WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH THEM. SO. JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY, WHEN WE DO RECOLLECT BIDS FOR PROJECTS, DO WE DO WE COLLECT BASE LOCATIONS FOR THE ONES TO WHERE WE CAN GO BACK AND SEE LIKE WHAT PARTS OF THE STATE OR COUNTRY WE GET BIDS FROM? DO YOU KNOW IF THAT INFORMATION IS KIND OF COLLECTED? WELL, AS FAR AS WHAT BIDS WE GOT. I KNOW WE GOT NINE DIFFERENT BIDS FOR THIS PROJECT. I DO KNOW THAT WE WERE ABLE TO COMPARE THE PRICE FROM OUR GREG MANOR GROUND STORAGE TANK. COMPARED TO THIS ONE, IT'S PRETTY MUCH EXACTLY THE SAME. WELL, NO, I DON'T MEAN THE PRICE. I'M ACTUALLY LOOKING AT JUST LIKE REGISTERED OFFICE LOCATIONS, DO WE? IS THAT USUALLY IN THE STANDARD PART OF THE APPLICATION? BECAUSE I JUST JUST. YES, SIR.

IT'S JUST MORE. SO PIGGYBACKING OFF OF WHAT COUNCILMAN MORENO ASKED IN REGARDS TO, YOU KNOW, SEEING WHERE WE GET A LOT OF OUR BIDS FROM, WHETHER IT'S TEXAS, YOU KNOW, AND IF IT IS WHAT PARTS OF TEXAS OR IF IT'S, YOU KNOW, COMPANIES THAT ARE MAINLY BASED OUT OF STATE BUT HAVE A LOCAL OFFICE, THAT KIND OF STUFF. MOST OF THE ONES FOR GREG MANOR AND FOR GREG LANE, THEY ALL WERE IN TEXAS. SOME WERE BASED OUT OF HORSESHOE BAY, SOME OUT OF AUSTIN. I THINK THE FURTHEST AWAY MAY HAVE BEEN SOMEBODY OUT OF HOUSTON, BUT FOR THE MOST PART, RECENTLY WE HAVEN'T HAD ANY OUT OF STATE BIDS. AND MOST OF THEM ARE BASED AND HAVE COMPANIES IN THE STATE OF TEXAS. OKAY. AND MOSTLY CENTRAL TEXAS. YES, MOSTLY IN CENTRAL TEXAS. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. OTHER QUESTIONS, COUNCIL MEMBERS. IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

WAS THERE A REP HERE TONIGHT, TOO? I'M SORRY. WAS THERE A REPRESENTATIVE TONIGHT FROM THE PROJECT? CONSTRUCTION COMPANY? NO, SIR. THERE IS. OKAY. DO WE KNOW? HOW FAR THEY ARE ON? ON ALL THAT TRAIL STUFF? ON THE TRAILS AND SIDEWALKS. THAT

[01:55:06]

YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT FOR THE STREET PROJECT? ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT FOR THE STREET PROJECT? NOT JUST THE TRAILS THAT WAS GOING AROUND IN THAT AREA. JUST. OH, THAT MIGHT BE MORE OF A DEVELOPMENT QUESTION. IF YOU GO BACK TO THE LAST IMAGE, YOU CAN SEE THE TRAIL THAT WAS NEW HAVEN'S RESPONSIBILITY. SO THAT'S IN FOR THE PORTIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION THEY'VE CONSTRUCTED. THERE'LL BE FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF IT NORTH IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT WHEN THEY GET TO THEIR LATER PHASES. OKAY. AND IT WILL CONNECT TO THE TRAIL THAT MONARCH RANCH WILL BE BUILDING. THAT GOES TO OKRAS, THAT CONNECTS TO CHATEAU GLEN, AND THAT IS ALSO IN MONARCH RANCH'S LATER PHASES, IN OKRAS LATER PHASES. BUT IT'S PART OF THEIR BUDS TO DO IT. THE ONLY PORTION TO BE WORKED OUT IS ACTUALLY THE CONNECTION UNDER THE BRIDGE. OKAY, BUT IS IT BECAUSE I SAW THE IMAGE AND I DIDN'T KNOW IF THIS WAS JUST KIND OF THE PAVED PATH AND IT'S DONE, OR IF IT'S UNUSABLE OR, OR IF IT'S NOT RELEASED YET FOR, FOR USAGE. IT'S BEEN ACCEPTED, RIGHT? YEAH. IT'S BEEN ACCEPTED. OKAY. YEAH. IT'S PAVED. IT'S BEEN IN FOR A LITTLE BIT. OKAY.

YEAH. ALL RIGHT. AND THE FENCING AROUND THE PUMP STATION WILL THOUGH THE TRAIL WILL BE OUTSIDE THE FENCING. YEAH. SO WE MADE SURE IT WAS LOCATED WHERE IT WOULDN'T INTERFERE.

OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, I'LL TAKE A MOTION. MAYOR, COUNCIL, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE AND AWARD THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH T T E LLC FOR THE BASE AND ALTERNATE BID AMOUNT OF $4,619,808.70. WELL, MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MORENO. IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY COUNCILWOMAN WARE? ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? NO QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. THANK YOU, THANK YOU.

[17. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Specific Use Permit for 15,000 square feet of Professional Office, Medical Office, and Medical Clinic, one (1) lot on 3.11 acres, more or less, being located at 13801 N FM 973, Manor, TX.]

MOVING RIGHT ALONG, COUNCIL MEMBERS, ITEM NUMBER 17. CONSIDERATION OF DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR 15,000FT■!S. PROFESSIONAL OFFICE MEDICAL USE.

THIS ONE WAS WAITING ON. NO. THIS REQUEST POSTPONED TO 28TH MAY 20TH. COUNCIL MEMBERS, CAN WE GET A MOTION TO POSTPONE ITEM NUMBER 17 TO MAY 20TH. MAYOR, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE POSTPONE ITEM NUMBER 17 TO THE MAY 20TH REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER MORENO. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. SECOND BY COUNCILWOMAN. WEIRD. IS THERE A QUESTION TO THE MOTION? NO QUESTIONS. ALL IN FAVOR?

[18. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Subdivision Concept Plan for Kimbro Crossing being seventeen (17) lots on 52.69 acres, more or less, and being TCAD parcel 236951 also known as 14018 E US 290 HWY, Manor, TX.]

OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. NEXT ITEM, NUMBER 18. THIS WASN'T THE SAME THING. NO. YOU CAN TAKE ACTION ON THIS ITEM. CONSIDER DISCUSSION. POSSIBLE ACTION ON A SUBDIVISION CONCEPT PLAN FOR CANBERRA CROSSING BEING 17 LOTS ON 52.69 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BMT CAB PARCEL 236951, ALSO KNOWN AS 14018 US HIGHWAY 290. MAYNARD, TEXAS. OKAY. COUNCIL. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS ONE? FOR THE THIS ONE WE DO HAVE. OR DO WE DO WE HAVE ANYBODY FOR THIS ONE? YEAH. THE APPLICANT HERE. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS DO WE HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT.

I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS. THEY'RE JUST THEY'RE MORE SO WONDERINGS THAN THAN ACTUALLY, YOU KNOW, HARD QUESTIONS. AND IT'S MORE SO IN REGARDS TO KIND OF WHAT YOUR, YOUR, YOUR IDEAL SITUATION IN REGARDS TO HOW THOSE 17 LOTS WILL KIND OF FILL UP, FILL UP.

FOR US. THE DEVELOPER IS PURCHASING THE TWO LOTS, THE ACADEMY AND HOBBY LOBBY FROM BATH. ZIMMERMAN. THERE ARE POTENTIAL PLANS IN THE WORKS FOR OUR DEVELOPER TO PURCHASE THE TWO LOTS TO THE EAST OF IT TO MAKE ONE CONTIGUOUS BUILDING, FILLING IT UP WITH A HOME, GOODS AND A SPROUTS. AS FAR AS THE REMAINING LOTS, THOSE WON'T BE PART OF OUR CLIENT. OUR DEVELOPERS DEAL, BUT WE ENVISION, YOU KNOW, SMALL RESTAURANTS AND MAYBE A FEW SIT DOWN PLACES, YOU KNOW, OTHER OTHER COMMERCIAL RETAIL CENTERS. OKAY. QUESTIONS COUNCIL MEMBERS.

[02:00:08]

YOU HAVE ANY ANTICIPATED TIMELINES ON THE TWO OR THE FOUR TOTAL THAT YOU'RE YOU'RE PART OF FOR THE FIRST TWO, YOU KNOW, WE'RE WORKING TO GET THE, THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND THE CDS IN, YOU KNOW, SO HOPEFULLY, YOU KNOW, MIDDLE OF THE YEAR, WE CAN START CONSTRUCTION FOR THE NEXT TWO PHASES. WE'RE STILL WORKING OUT PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN DETAILS TO SEE IF HE CAN MAKE IT WORK. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THERE'S NO QUESTIONS. I ENTERTAIN QUESTIONS OR EMOTION.

THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU.

QUESTIONS OR EMOTION? I GAVE YOU ALL SOME TIME TO SCROLL.

ANYONE THERE YET? WE'RE GOING TO MAKE A MOTION. I HAD A QUESTION. I WAS TRYING TO FIND IT SO I WOULDN'T JUST BE REDUNDANT. BUT PHASE ONE OF OLD KIMBROUGH ROAD. WHICH ONE IS THE NORTH SIDE? WHICH WAY IS THAT COMING? IS THAT LIKE LEAVING MAYNOR? NOT ON 290 OR COMING OFF OF 290? GOING IN ONTO OAK HILL. PHASE ONE. THAT'D PROBABLY BE THE NORTH SIDE BECAUSE THEY BUILT IT OUT. MAYNOR HEIGHTS DID, AS PART OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT INTO THE TWO LANE CONFIGURATION, AND THEN THEY'LL EXTEND THAT FURTHER UP. BUT THE SOUTH SIDE IS AS IT HAS BEEN, YOU KNOW, THE ORIGINAL TWO LANE CONFIGURATION. BUT YEAH, THE THE NORTH SIDE THAT HAD A PHASE ONE TO IT AND A FUTURE PHASE TWO FOR THE ROADWAY. DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE ASKING? SCOTT. I WASN'T A GIRL SCALE, I DON'T KNOW NORTH SOUTH, NORTH. IF YOU'RE LEAVING MAYNOR IT GOES OFF TO THE LEFT. OKAY. GOT IT. AND I GUESS MY MY BIG CONCERN WAS, WAS THAT BASED OFF OF LIKE THE NORMAL TRAFFIC PATTERN OF WHERE BECAUSE WE, IT SEEMS LIKE WE DO HAVE MORE TRAFFIC GOING. ONE OF THOSE DIRECTIONS ON OLD KIMBROUGH MORE THAN WE DO ANOTHER ONE. AND SO IF IT WAS BASED OFF OF A STUDY ALREADY, MAYBE A TIA STUDY, BUT JUST MAKING SURE THAT THAT WAS THE ONE THAT WAS MOST SIGNIFICANT IS THE ONE THAT GETS THE ATTENTION FIRST. SURE. SO MANOR HEIGHTS OR OLD CAMBRIDGE ON THE NORTH SIDE. SO WITHIN CAROLINE MANOR HEIGHTS, THAT WAS EXPANDED BECAUSE THE ROADWAY WENT THROUGH THEIR DEVELOPMENT. AND SO THEY DID HAVE, YOU KNOW, CERTAIN TRAFFIC MITIGATIONS THEY WOULD HAVE HAD TO DO TO IT WITH ADDING ALL THE HOUSES AND TRAFFIC RESIDENTS ON IT. BUT PART OF THEIR TOURS AND THEIR PYD WAS MAKING IT A FOUR LANE COLLECTOR CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S THOROUGHFARE PLAN.

SO THEY'VE ACTUALLY MANOR HEIGHTS SORT OF OVERBUILT IT. THAT'S SORT OF PART OF THEIR INCENTIVES AND PACKAGE WITH THE CITY. BUT THIS ALSO ADDS A RIGHT TURN LANE TO IT. SO IT ADDS ADDITIONAL TURNING CAPACITY. AND WE'VE BEEN TALKING WITH TEX-DOT ABOUT HOW THAT INTERSECTION WORKS WITH THE ADDITIONAL LANES ON THE NORTH SIDE, BUT NOT ON THE SOUTH SIDE, MAKING SURE THAT THERE'S SAFE MOVEMENT AND FUTURE EXPANSIONS OF THAT INTERSECTION CAN BE ACCOMMODATED. BUT NONE OF IT IS THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY.

BUILD. AND YOU KNOW, THIS IS ALL DEVELOPER LED. NOW, SAY COUNCIL, TO SCOTT'S POINT ABOUT

[02:05:02]

WORKING WITH TEX-DOT, WE ARE WORKING WITH THE OWNERS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 292, MAYBE SEE IF WE CAN SECURE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY, BECAUSE WE KNOW IF WE GET ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY IDENTIFIED, THEN IT WOULD ALLOW FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE TO PLAN, KNOWING THAT POTENTIAL DEDICATED RIGHT OF WAY COULD BE SOMETHING TO WORK WITH. SO I THINK THAT'S GOING TO BE HELPFUL WITH THE WAY THE TURNING MOVEMENTS ARE. IF YOU NOTICE, IT'S REALLY CHOPPED UP PRETTY BAD. SO THE GOAL IS TO MAKE SURE WE CAN MAKE THOSE, THOSE IMPROVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION. HOPEFULLY WE CAN MAKE GET THE RIGHT OF WAY, MAKE THOSE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TWO NINE THERE TOO AS WELL. I THINK I'VE ALWAYS SEEN AT THE END OF THE DAY, MORE PEOPLE CUTTING THROUGH THE 973 ROUTE OR TRAFFIC, AND THEN THEY END UP COMING UP THAT SIDE. AND SO THAT'S, THAT'S THE IT'S NOT JUST PEOPLE FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN THE MORNING THAT ARE JUST LEAVING, BUT IT'S JUST HIGH TRAFFIC IN THAT SIDE. AND YOU CAN TELL IN THAT LITTLE CORNER CURVE JUST KIND OF GETS WORN OUT. OKAY. BUT AS LONG AS IT'S NOT, IT'S I'M OKAY. ARE WE GOOD? WE'LL TAKE THAT MOTION. MAYOR, COUNCIL, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE A SUBDIVISION CONCEPT PLAN FOR KIMBALL CROSSING BEING 17 LOTS ON 52.69 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING TCAD PARCEL 23, 6951, ALSO KNOWN AS 14 ZERO 18 EAST US 290 HIGHWAY. MAYNARD, TEXAS.

MOTION FOR MY COUNCIL MEMBER MORENO IS THERE A SECOND I SECOND. SECOND BY COUNCILMAN METZGER. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? BEING NONE. ALL IN FAVOR OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES

[19. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Specific Use Permit for 5,725 square feet of Medical Office, one (1) lot on 6.76 acres, more or less, and being Las Entradas North, also known as 12420 Tillgang Pass, Manor, TX.]

SIX ZERO. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 19. THERE WE GO. THERE WE GO. CONSIDERATION.

DISCUSSION. POSSIBLE ACTION ON A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR 5725FT■!S OF MEDICAL OFFICE. ONE LOT ON 6.76 ACRES MORE OR LESS. AND BEN LAWSON, TROTTER'S NORTH, ALSO KNOWN AS 12420 TAILGATE TAILGATE PASS MADE OF TEXAS. YES, SIR, THIS ONE REQUESTING POSTPONEMENT TO MAY 20TH. SO PLANNING COMMISSION CAN. MAKE OR MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON IT TO BRING BACK TO YOU ALL. YOU HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR. MAYOR COUNCIL. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE POSTPONE ITEM NUMBER 19 UNTIL THE MAY 20TH. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING. MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER JAWANDO.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND BY COUNCILWOMAN? WEIRD. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION BEING NONE. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. I THINK WE ARE FOR NUMBER 20.

POSTPONING THAT ONE. NO. 21. WE'RE PULLING IT. YES, MA'AM. I'M HERE FOR ITEM 20. I'M HERE

[20. Consideration, discussion, and possible action regarding an Ordinance of the City of Manor, Texas Making a Finding of Special Benefit to the Property in Improvement Area #5 of the Manor Heights Public Improvement District; Providing for the Method of Assessment of Special Assessments Against Property in Improvement Area #5 of the District; Approving an Assessment Roll for Improvement Area #5 of the District; Levying Assessments against Property within Improvement Area #5 of the District; Providing for Payment of the Assessments; Providing for Penalties and Interest on Delinquent Assessments; Establishing a Lien on Property within Improvement Area #5 of the District; Approving an Amended and Restated Service and Assessment Plan; Providing for Related Matters in Accordance with Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code; Providing an Effective Date; and Providing for Severability.]

FOR ITEM 20. OKAY. CONSIDERATION. DISCUSSION. POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY MADE IN TEXAS. MAKING A FINDING OF SPECIAL BENEFIT TO THE PROPERTY IN IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER FIVE OF THE MANOR HEIGHTS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. PROVIDING FOR A METHOD OF ASSESSMENT, A SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER FIVE WITH THE DISTRICT AND APPROVING AN ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER FIVE OF THE DISTRICT. LEVEE ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PROPERTY WITHIN IMPROVEMENT.

NUMBER FIVE OF THE DISTRICT PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES AND INTEREST ON DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS. ESTABLISHING LEAN ON PROPERTY WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER FIVE OF THE DISTRICT. APPROVING AND AMENDED AND RESTATED SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN PROVIDING FOR RELATED MATTERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 372, TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.

YES, MA'AM. MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS VERONICA RIVERA, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY. NOW, YOU JUST HAD YOUR PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN AND THE LEVYING OF ASSESSMENTS. AGAIN, THIS IS FOR IMPROVEMENT AREA NUMBER FIVE. WE DO HAVE SOMEONE FROM P THREE IF YOU'D LIKE TO IF YOU LIKE MORE INFORMATION OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN, AS I MENTIONED TO YOU, IT WILL ALSO SERVE AS THE ANNUAL SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR THAT IS REQUIRED BY STATE STATUTE. NOW WE ALSO HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM. AND I'M HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS COUNCIL MEMBERS. WE'LL TAKE QUESTIONS OR FOR LEGAL OR FOR

[02:10:05]

THE APPLICANT OR WE ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MAYOR COUNCIL. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 817 REGARDING REGARDING THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS IN THE IMPROVEMENT AREA. NUMBER FIVE OF THE MANOR HEIGHTS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND APPROVED A 2026 AMENDED AND RESTATED SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN. MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER MORENO. IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY COUNCILWOMAN WHERE? ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO. ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER 21 IS THE ONE WE'RE NOT DOING RIGHT. OKAY. I KNEW IT WAS ONE OF THOSE. ALL RIGHT. CITY COUNCIL WILL NOW CONVENE

[EXECUTIVE SESSION]

INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO THE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

Apr 15, 2026 City Council

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item