[ Planning & Zoning Commission on May 13, 2026.]
[00:00:12]
13TH, 2026. A QUORUM IS PRESENT. I WILL CALL TO ORDER THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION OF THE CITY OF MESA. WE ARE GATHERED AT 301 EAST EGGLESTON STREET, THAT IS CITY HALL IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS. FIRST OFF, I WILL CALL UP OUR WHITE CARD. I HAVE ONE WHITE CARD FROM MISS CHRIS SQUIRE. YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. I'D LIKE TO KNOW WHICH ONE OF YOU HAS 20,000 TO $100,000 TO ENTERTAIN A LAWSUIT AGAINST AN ORGANIZATION LIKE KB HOME. LAST WEEK, I EMAILED A PUBLIC COMMENT WHICH WAS NOT READ TO CITY COUNCIL. MICHAEL BURRELL, YOU'RE RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT FAILURE. IN OCTOBER OF 2025, I REQUESTED THE PLANS AND MODIFICATIONS. KB HOME WAS REQUESTING APPROVAL. HOWEVER, THE CITY OF MANER IS IN CAHOOTS WITH KB HOME AND DID NOT SUPPLY THESE PLANS UNTIL 4:30 P.M. THE AFTERNOON. WE WERE TO HAVE THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING, I REQUESTED A DELAY IN APPROVAL SO THE PLANS CAN BE REVIEWED. ONE CITY COUNCIL MEMBER STOOD UP FOR ME BUT WAS BULLIED BY MANER ENGINEERS AND LAWYERS, SO THE APPROVAL WAS PUSHED ANYWAY. THE CITY OF MANER EMPLOYEES, BOTH ELECTED AND HIRED, WILL RUBBER STAMP ANY DEVELOPER COMING INTO MANER AND BE DECEITFUL AND GASLIGHT COMMUNITY MEMBERS. KB HOME STAGE TWO HAS BROUGHT NOTHING BUT MORE WATER DESTRUCTION OF MY PROPERTY. IN WASHING AWAY MY FAMILY DREAMS. I AM HERE TODAY TO TELL YOU THAT MY LAWSUIT HAS BEEN FILED. I HAVE BEEN IN TOUCH WITH OUR STATE REPRESENTATIVES. I HAVE RECEIVED FEEDBACK FROM OTHER COMMUNITY MEMBERS WHO ARE ALSO EXPERIENCING FLOODING FROM DEVELOPMENTS THAT MANER HAS APPROVED. I HAVE LOOKED INTO FILING COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE LAW FIRMS AND ENGINEERS WHO CONTRACT WITH MANER, WITH THEIR STATE LICENSING ORGANIZATIONS. MY RANCH IS MY LIFELONG DREAM, BOTH PERSONALLY AND PROFESSIONALLY. YET KB HOME CAN DISREGARD THE LAW, PUSH CITY OFFICIALS AROUND AND OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR PLANS THAT DEVASTATE THEIR NEIGHBORS. YOU ARE PART OF THIS ORGANIZATION AND CITY, AND CREATING A SPACE THAT IS HEALTHY, PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY FOR OUR RESIDENTS. AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN, YOU GET THE GREEN LIGHT FROM SCOTT TO PUSH THESE PLANS AND YOU'RE DEVASTATING THE COMMUNITY. YOU HAVE BILLION DOLLAR DEVELOPMENTS COMING IN. KB HOMES DEVELOPMENT IS MANY BILLIONS OF DOLLARS. AND RATHER THAN DEVELOPING A BEAUTIFUL SPACE THAT THE COMMUNITY CAN BENEFIT FROM AND ACTUALLY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WATER AND POTENTIALLY BUILD A LAKE THAT PEOPLE CAN GATHER AT, YOU GUYS APPROVE DETENTION PONDS THAT ONLY LET WATER DOWNSTREAM AND THEREFORE FLOOD NEIGHBORS. IT'S NOT JUST ME, IT'S ALL OF SUNCREST ROAD. IT'S OTHER DEVELOPERS, OTHER FAMILIES THAT HAVE COME HERE. WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT STORM WATER ISSUES AND IT'S YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO BE THE GATEKEEPERS, NOT SCOTT TELLING YOU, GO AHEAD AND GREENLIGHT IT. I AM ASKING YOU GUYS TO PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THIS CITY AND HOLD THE DEVELOPERS ACCOUNTABLE. WHAT YOU'RE DEVELOPING TODAY IMPACTS THE CITY FOR DECADES TO COME. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR. ROBERT BATTLE. YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES TO SPEAK ON THE NON-AGENDA TOPIC OF, QUOTE, CRAPPY MANER ETHICS AS WELL AS ITEMS SIX, EIGHT, TEN AND 12. YOUR TIME WILL START. ACTUALLY, BEFORE YOU START, I HAVE A POINT OF ORDER I'D LIKE TO ASK. OKAY. YOU DIDN'T CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER LAST TIME.
IT'S AVOID MEETING. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT? IT'S EVERYTHING ABOUT IT IS VOID BECAUSE YOU NEVER HIT THE GAVEL AND YOU NEVER CALLED IT TO ORDER. OKAY, SO NOT ONLY THAT, I WAS THERE TO SPEAK ON PUBLIC COMMENT AND YOU DIDN'T LET ME TALK. SO I WANT MY FIVE MINUTES FROM THAT TIME RIGHT NOW TO WE'RE NOT ABLE TO GIVE YOU THAT. THERE WAS THERE WAS NO QUORUM PRESENT. THE MEETING WAS NOT ABLE TO BE HELD. YOU STILL HAVE TO GAVEL IT DOWN TOGETHER TO START IT. AND THEN YOU SAY THERE'S NO QUORUM, AND THEN YOU CLOSE THE MEETING, BUT YOU BECAUSE YOU'RE MR. SMARTY PANTS, YOU DIDN'T EVEN DO THAT. AND THEREFORE, THIS LITTLE STUFF THAT THE SERPENT OVER HERE, SHE WAS NICE ABOUT THIS GUY. THIS GUY SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN LET BACK INTO OUR CITY. OKAY, SO I HAVE A LAWSUIT TO. OH, WAIT, LET ME GET MY ANSWER. DO I GET MY EXTRA FIVE MINUTES? NO, SIR. DO YOU HAVE A DO YOU WANT TO ASK THE CITY ATTORNEY HERE OR
[00:05:04]
THE PARLIAMENTARIAN? NO, SIR. YOU DON'T WANT TO ASK THEM. I'M THE CHAIR OF THIS MEETING, SIR.I'LL PAUSE YOUR TIME WHILE YOU HOLD. I HAVE 426 WHEN YOU WHEN I RESUME. SO YOU TOOK SOME OF MY TIME. I DIDN'T TAKE ANY ONE TIME. YOU SAID I HAD 426. NOW, I PAUSED YOUR TIME BECAUSE YOU WERE SPEAKING. I WILL START THE TIMER AGAIN. I WANT TO START AT FIVE MINUTES. SO THIS IS NOT A TEA DANCE. WHAT? THIS IS NOT A TEA DANCE. THIS IS A MEETING. IT IS A TEA DANCE. THIS IS LIKE A LITTLE KINDERGARTEN CLASS. YOUR CLOCK IS RESUMED. 426 OKAY, WELL, IN MY LAWSUIT, HE JUST GOT SERVED WITH THE PETITION. SO DID LYDIA COLLINS. SO DID RH O LLC. SO DID SKY VILLAGE, KIMBROUGH ESTATES, LLC, AND SO DID LYDIA COLLINS. NOW, IN CASE YOU HADN'T FIGURED THIS OUT, I'M STARTING TO SUE PEOPLE PERSONALLY. HE'S BEING SUED PERSONALLY. KNIGHT LORE IS BEING SUED PERSONALLY AND PROFESSIONALLY. AND IF YOU SIGN YOUR NAME, SIR, ON ANYTHING THAT I THINK IS ILLEGAL OR THEFT, I'M GOING TO SUE ANYBODY. I WANT TO PERSONALLY. YOU GUYS DON'T GET TO PLAY DUMB ANYMORE. ONE, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT KIMBROUGH CROSSING 25.61 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. OUR OWN CITY ORDINANCE REQUIRES A PUBLIC PLAZA FOR EVERY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OVER TEN ACRES. WHEN ARE YOU GUYS GOING TO START REQUIRING THAT? DO YOU GUYS DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT A PLAZA IS? PETE DWYER, THAT POOR WHITE TRASH GUY, I LIKE HIM, I THINK HE'S INTERESTING. BUT MAN, HE AND AND BART TIMMERMAN, 30 YEARS AGO, THEY SAT DOWN AT A BAR AND THEY WROTE OUT A NAPKIN AND THEY JUST CARVED UP OUR TOWN. THEN THEY PICKED WHO'S GOING TO BE ON THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE? I THINK PETE DWYER IS A PARTNER IN MANURE JOURNAL, THE NEWSPAPER. AND I'M ALSO SUING DORI WEST PERSONALLY. SHE DEFAMED ME AND SHE HAS KEPT OUR CITY IN THE DARK. SHE'S NOT A NEWSPAPER, BY THE WAY. I DID ASK FOR A BOOTH AT THE FIVE K RUN FOR MAYNARD MESSENGER AND FOR THE AUSTIN BOCCE LEAGUE. OKAY, NOW, IF I DON'T GET THAT, WHOEVER SIGNS THAT PIECE OF PAPER REFUSING ME IS GOING TO BE PERSONALLY LAWSUIT. NOW, HERE'S THE WAY IT WORKS IN THE COURTS. THE JURY DECIDES THIS STUFF. SO WHEN SCOTT ADAMS SAYS, WHEN SCOTT DUNLOP, HE SAYS, I WAS STALKING YOU REMEMBER THIS, SCOTT? I WAS DOING MY LAUNDRY AND ONE OF YOUR WORKERS, THE BUILDING INSPECTOR, SHOWS UP AND HE COMES IN AND HE GOES OVER THERE AND GETS A HAIRCUT ON OUR DIME. WELL, YOU SAID I WAS STALKING HIM, AND YOU SAID THAT HE, I, I TO GET A GOTCHA MOMENT. WHAT DO YOU THINK A JURY'S GOING TO AWARD ME FOR THAT 50,000 OR 100? WELL, OKAY. ON TEXAS COURTS, IT'S EXEMPLARY. IF YOU GUYS SCREW UP AND, YOU KNOW, YOU SCREW UP, IT'S DOUBLE. BUT THEN WHEN I TAKE THAT DOUBLE INTO THE FEDERAL RICO COURT RACKETEERING, IT'S TRIPLE. SO LET'S SAY IT'S TEN TIMES TWO. THAT'S 20 TIMES THREE. THAT'S 60. 60 PLUS 20 IS 80,000 FOR JUST OKAYING. ONE SIMPLE THING, IF YOU OKAY, ONE SIMPLE THING.
THIS GOES FOR YOU, MR. SCOTT BURRELL. DOES ANYONE REALLY THINK SCOTT BURRELL IS THE SUPERVISOR OF THIS GUY? OKAY, THEY'RE STEALING OUR PARKS MONEY TOO. CAN YOU GIVE ME A TWO MINUTE WARNING WHEN I GET THERE? THAT'S ALL YOU HAVE? 135 LEFT. THANK YOU. WELL, BASICALLY, THIS PLANT HERE, 17.64 ACRES, IS FLOODPLAIN. ALONG COTTONWOOD CREEK. IT'S NOT PARKLAND. THEY'VE GOT ONE LITTLE SPOT. IT'S A WATER DITCH. MANER HEIGHTS OWES US $15 MILLION. 15 MILLION TIMES TWO IS 30 MILLION. 30 MILLION TIMES THREE IS 60. 60 PLUS 20 IS $80 MILLION. THAT'S WHAT I'M GOING TO COLLECT FROM THE PLACES THAT YOU LET STEAL THE PARKLAND FROM US. NOT YOU GUYS. YOU GUYS HAVE DONE A COUPLE GOOD THINGS. SOMEDAY YOU'RE GOING TO UNDERSTAND THAT YOU'RE ACTUALLY A COMMITTEE AND YOU'RE GOING TO KICK HIM OFF OF THERE, AND YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE SOMEDAY YOU'LL HAVE YOUR OWN EMAIL ADDRESS. DO YOU THINK YOU GUYS COULD DO THAT? EVER GET YOUR OWN EMAIL ADDRESS? WHEN DID YOU GET MY EMAIL FROM? TWO DAYS AGO.
DID HE SLOW WALK IT? DID YOU GET IT FIVE MINUTES BEFORE IT WENT OUT? LIKE TWO AND A HALF DAYS AGO? WHEN YOU GET MY EMAIL YOU TO THE P AND Z COMMISSION, YOU SEND IT IMMEDIATELY. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? DO YOU KNOW HE DOESN'T HAVE TO ANSWER ME? OKAY. LET'S SEE. TOTAL THEFT. WELL, IT'S THE ENGINEER'S BARTH TIMMERMAN. I THOUGHT MAYBE HE WAS GOING TO BE. DID HE GET APPOINTED TO THE PUBLIC IMPACT FEES? IF HE'S APPOINTED TO THAT. WELL, HE I'M ALREADY SUING HIM PERSONALLY. WHAT AM I WORRYING ABOUT? OKAY. THE CITY SECRETARY, MAYOR, CITY ATTORNEY, THEY'RE ALL IN CAHOOTS. THIS IS A RACKETEERING THING. THE THE THE ROTTEN APPLE POLICE CHIEF. I DON'T SEE THEM ANYWHERE. YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED, SIR. THANK YOU. WELL, THANK YOU. I REALLY
[00:10:04]
APPRECIATE IT. I REALLY ENJOY IT. IT WASN'T AS GOOD FOR YOU AS IT WAS FOR ME. THAT CONCLUDES PUBLIC COMMENTS. WE ARE MOVING ON TO OUR FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR 1500 ZERO SQUARE FEET OF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE, MEDICAL OFFICE AND MEDICAL CLINIC ON ONE LOT ON ABOUT 13.11 ACRES MORE OR LESS BEING LOCATED AT 13801 NORTH FM 973 IN MAYNARD, TEXAS. THE APPLICANT IS RAFIQ AND OWNER IS PLATINUM. 973 LLC. MR. BATTLE, YOU ARE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES.YEAH, IT USED TO BE THREE, BUT NOW IT'S TWO. OKAY, NOW, THIS IS A SOMEWHAT INTERESTING SITUATION BECAUSE YES, WE DO WANT MEDICAL FACILITIES AND YOU GUYS BROUGHT UP A GOOD POINT.
DO WE WANT THEM AT THE FRONT OF THE PLACE OR IN THE BACK? THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. MY BETTER QUESTION FOR THE MOMENT IS WHY AREN'T WE REQUIRING A PLAZA? SOME PEOPLE THINK HEALTH AND WELLNESS. IT'S NICE FOR PEOPLE TO SIT OUT AND COMMUNICATE WITH EACH OTHER. WE DON'T HAVE ONE SINGLE PLACE ANYWHERE IN TOWN. AND IN FACT, YOU KNOW THE LITTLE PLACE OVER HERE, THE ART PARK, THEY PUT IN SOME PUBLIC ART THERE. THEY PUT IN A PICTURE OF AN AUSTIN PARKING GARAGE. IT'S A PICTURE OF AN AUSTIN PARKING GARAGE. YOU GUYS DIDN'T EAT. DO YOU NOT WANT TO APPROVE PUBLIC ART? I THINK THAT'S PART OF, YOU KNOW, THEY CAN'T PUT IN A THE HARRIET TUBMAN MURAL FOR FREE, BUT THEY PUT IN A PICTURE OF AN AUSTIN PARKING GARAGE. SO MY QUESTION IS HERE. WHEN ARE THESE LAZY, CHEAP BASTARDS GOING TO START PUTTING SOME PARKS IN? THANK YOU. I MEAN, PLAZA, I MEANT TO SAY APPLAUSE. THAT CONCLUDES ALL THE SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM.
STAFF A SUMMARY. SURE. SO THIS IS THE NEW VALERO GAS STATION THAT'S ON A 973 BY SUNCREST RIGHT NEXT TO A COMPASS ROSE. SO THEIR FIRST PHASE IS OPEN, WHICH IS THE GAS STATION CONVENIENCE STORE AND THE THE RESTAURANTS INSIDE. AND THEY'RE UNDER CONSTRUCTION ON TWO 7500 SQUARE FOOT BUILDINGS FOR PHASE TWO. AND THAT'S WHERE THE SPECIFIC USE IS BEING REQUESTED FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THOSE TWO BUILDINGS. AND THEY'RE REQUESTING PROFESSIONAL OFFICE, MEDICAL OFFICE AND MEDICAL CLINIC SO THEY CAN HAVE A RANGE OF DIFFERENT MEDICAL SERVICES.
AND THEN PROFESSIONAL OFFICE COULD BE THINGS LIKE A REAL ESTATE AGENT, TAX PREPARER, OR SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES. AND THIS AREA, YOU KNOW, TYPICALLY WE DO RECOMMEND, YOU KNOW, NO MORE THAN 10% OF A PROPERTY TO BE UNDER A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THESE MEDICAL TYPE USES OR OFFICE USES. BUT THIS PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED AFTER, YOU KNOW, IT WAS ANNEXED IN 2017. I MIGHT HAVE IT ON THE FORM, BUT WE DON'T COLLECT SALES TAX ON IT. AND SO, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE GET TO THE ACTION ITEM, WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. SO THAT WAY, AS REQUESTS COME IN FOR MEDICAL USES IN AREAS WHERE THE CITY DOES COLLECT SALES TAX, WE HAVE MORE PLACES TO DIRECT THEM TO. TO PLACES THAT WE DON'T COLLECT THE SALES TAX AND THAT ARE ALREADY PERMITTED. SO WE DON'T HAVE, YOU KNOW, SPECIFIC USE PERMITS ALL OVER THE CITY. WE CAN SORT OF MAYBE START CREATING MEDICAL DISTRICTS AND MEDICAL HUB TYPE AREAS. BUT YES, I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY. AND WE CAN ALSO DISCUSS THAT, MR. CAVITIES, YOU'LL BE HERE FOR THE BUSINESS ITEM AS WELL, AND WE'LL PROBABLY ADDRESS THAT MORE AS WE GET TO THE BUSINESS ITEM. SURE. MY NAME IS RAFIQ RADIA AND I'M. OH, SORRY. YEAH. DID YOU WANT TO ADDRESS THIS NOW OR DO YOU WANT US TO TALK? WE'LL ASK YOU HERE AFTER WE HAVE QUESTIONS YOU CAN ASK ME. OKAY. HERE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU. AND SORRY, NOT CAVITIES. YEAH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT? IF NONE I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THE PUBLIC HEARING. I MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ITEM NUMBER ONE. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER PAES TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MEYER.
ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? SEEING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED THAT? MOTION PASSES SEVEN ZERO. ITEM TWO, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT ON 5725FTā !S OF MEDICAL OFFICE. ON ONE LOT ON 6.676 ACRES. I'M NOT READING THIS TONIGHT. 6.76 ACRES MORE OR LESS. AND BEING LOST IN TROT US NORTH, ALSO KNOWN AS 12420 TILLGANG PASS IN MANOR, TEXAS. THE APPLICANT IS LVEREG LP AS WELL AS THE OWNER. I WILL GET INTO THIS, BUT
[00:15:07]
DANIEL FRYE, YOU ARE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK IF YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK. OR ARE YOU JUST HERE TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? OKAY, WE CAN TALK. ALL RIGHT, MR. BATTLE, YOU CAN SPEAK UP TO TWO MINUTES.OH, THANK YOU SIR. MY NAME IS ROBERT BATTLE. WHAT? YOU HAD A, I THINK A NEAR EXPLETIVE COME OUT LAST TIME AS YOU WERE LEAVING THIS. WHAT WAS THAT? I DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO PEOPLE'S WORDS. WELL, THEN WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? PLEASE WATCH YOUR MOUTH UP HERE. PLEASE.
THIS IS MY REMONSTRANCE. YOU DON'T GET TO TELL ME WHAT TO TALK. I LIVE IN A STATE WHERE FREEDOM OF SPEECH EXISTS. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT? SO I DON'T NEED YOU TO TELL ME. DECORUM.
WHEN YOU'RE PUTTING TOWNHOMES ON TOP OF BLACK PEOPLE'S GRAVES, YOU APPROVE THAT. AND YOU'RE GOING TO GIVE ME A LECTURE ON NOT SAYING JACKASS. DID I SAY JACKASS? WAS THAT THE WORD? I'M SORRY. I'M TRYING TO I IN MY LAWSUIT, I ASKED FOR GUIDANCE ON THIS BECAUSE I CALLED IN AND OUR POMPOUS BEANBAG JEFFERY TRAVILLION. I SAID HE HADN'T DONE A DAMN THING FOR ME IN EIGHT YEARS. AND JUDGE BROWN GOT ALL UPSET. HE SAID, OH, ROBERT ROBERTS, YOU CAN'T TALK LIKE THAT. YOU HAVE TO SHOW DECORUM. JEFFREY, YOU'RE A REALLY GREAT COMMISSIONER. I'M SORRY YOU HAD TO HEAR THAT. WELL, THAT'S THE KIND OF PEOPLE WE HAVE RUNNING OUR COUNTY. OUR COUNTY AND THE THE COMMISSIONERS THERE ALSO IN CHARGE OF THE JAILS. THEY CAN'T EVEN AFFORD A PAPER PLATES AND THEY WOULD NEVER PUT THEIR DOGS THERE. BUT ON THIS ISSUE, CAN YOU PULL UP THE MAP PLEASE? TOURS TO. THAT'S THE ONE YOU ASKED FOR. REMEMBER? REMEMBER, MR. CHAIRMAN, YOU SAID YOU DIDN'T HAVE IT, BUT YOU DIDN'T HAVE THE BRAINPOWER TO ASK HER TO PULL IT. ARE YOU ABLE TO PULL THAT UP? CAN YOU ASK HER TO PULL UP TOURS TO. DO YOU KNOW WHAT TIRZ STANDS FOR? I'LL RESPOND. TAX INCREMENT. REFINANCE ZONE. INVESTMENT ZONE.
SIR. IT'S WHAT? TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE, SIR, CAN YOU TELL THAT TO THE CITY COUNCIL? CAN. DO YOU KNOW WHAT IT IS? YOU SAID YOU DIDN'T KNOW WHERE IT WAS. SO CAN YOU ASK HER TO BRING IT UP TO HER MAP TO. THIS IS YOUR CHANCE TO, LIKE, BE A MAN. MR. BATTLE, YOU HAVE 22 SECONDS. THIS IS INCOMPETENCY RIGHT IN OUR FACE. AND I'M GOING TO SUE YOU PERSONALLY.
YOU UNDERSTAND? YOU DID MEETINGS WITHOUT PUBLIC NOTICE. YOU ARE IN THIS MAP. YOU KNOW, I'LL HAVE SOME MORE THINGS TO TALK ABOUT. BUT THE FACT THAT YOU ARE KEEPING ME FROM TALKING ON ALL THESE AGENDA ITEMS BECAUSE YOU HAVE AN ILLEGAL. OH, THIS WHOLE PROCESS OF THE TWO SPEAKERS. WELL, THANK YOU SIR. SOMEDAY WE'LL HAVE A LITTLE TIMER LIGHT. THEY COST 200 BUCKS. COMMISSIONERS. THAT IS ALL THE SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM. STAFF, DID YOU WANT TO PROVIDE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THIS? THIS IS OVER. THIS IS IN THE SAME PROPERTY AS A PREVIOUS ITEM WE HAD COME UP FOR MEDICAL OFFICE. SO THIS IS OVER IN LAS ENTRADAS NORTH, WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE TOURS. AND SO THIS IS NEXT TO KIND OF IN BETWEEN BOJANGLES AND BREAKS, PLUS THE AREA THERE WHERE THERE'S NEW RETAIL CENTERS ARE GOING IN. AND SO THERE'S TWO BUILDINGS THAT ARE PRETTY MUCH FINISHED AT THIS POINT. SO THE TENANTS ARE STARTING TO GO INTO THEIR SPACES. THIS INCLUDES CHEWY'S ACTION CENTER, A PILATES STUDIO, AND A COUPLE OTHERS. AND SO THEY ARE REQUESTING THE REQUEST WAS INITIALLY PUT IN FOR 5725FTā !S OF MEDICAL OFFICE, BUT IT WAS REDUCED TO 2200. SO THE WE COULDN'T CHANGE THE LANGUAGE ON THE AGENDA SINCE IT'S ALREADY BEEN POSTED, BUT YOUR BACKUP IS FOR 2200FTā !S OF MEDICAL OFFICE, WHICH IS PROPOSED TO BE A DENTIST OFFICE. THIS PROPERTY, THE CITY DOES COLLECT SALES TAX. AND SO WE WERE LOOKING AT THE PERCENTAGES OF, YOU KNOW, NON SALES TAX USES. AND THEN WHAT IS PERMITTED THROUGH A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. AND SO THIS WOULD BE THE FIRST SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROPERTY. AND WITH THE TOTAL BUILD OUT OF THE FROST BANK THE BREAKS PLUS SHOPS ONE AND TWO AND THE FUTURE SHOPS THREE WHICH IS 9000FTā !S, THIS 2200 REPRESENTS ABOUT 4.4%. BUT IF YOU INCLUDE THE OTHER USES THAT ARE ALREADY KNOWN. SO ACTION BEHAVIOR CENTER, FROST BANK, THE PILATES STUDIO THAT REPRESENTS ABOUT 34% OF THE DEVELOPMENT, AND THERE'S STILL 38%, WHICH IS UNKNOWN. BUT WITHIN THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ON THE PROPERTY, IT IS SHOWN AS LIKE COMMUNITY MIXED USE, WHICH DOES ALLOW FOR A HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF OFFICE
[00:20:05]
UP TO 40%. SO COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR TRIES TO FOCUS MORE ON THE RETAIL USES, BUT COMMUNITY MIXED USE AS A LAND USE DESIGNATION WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENVISIONS A HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF OFFICE TYPE USES, SO THIS WOULD STILL BE IN ALIGNMENT WITH THAT. EVEN WITH THE, YOU KNOW, THE ADDITIONAL PERMITTED BY RIGHT USES THAT DON'T GENERATE SALES TAX OR SIGNIFICANT SALES TAX. SO WHEN YOU GET TO THE ACTION ITEM, WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. THANK YOU. AND THIS THE PUBLIC HEARING RIGHT NOW IS FOR THE 5725 AS POSTED. CORRECT.IT IS 5725, BUT IT WAS MODIFIED AFTER TO 2200. SO THEY ARE ONLY REQUESTING 2200. AND OKAY. THE RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO APPROVE IT AT 2200. OKAY. FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING AS WELL. YOU WOULD JUST HAVE TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. THE PUBLIC HEARING WE'RE CLOSING, AND THEN WE'LL TAKE THIS UP IN THE BUSINESS ITEM AS IT COULD BE ZERO. IT COULD BE 15,000. IT COULD BE WHATEVER. ALL RIGHT. QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. NONE WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE ITEM NUMBER TWO PUBLIC HEARING. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ABBOTT TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PIES. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED.
MOTION PASSES SEVEN ZERO. THAT GETS US TO ITEM THREE, WHICH IS CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A SHORT FORM FINAL PLAT WITH VARIANCES TO CHAPTER TEN, EXHIBIT A, ARTICLE THREE, SECTION 45 B EIGHT RELATED TO THE WIDTH TO DEPTH RATIO, AND ALSO CHAPTER TEN, EXHIBIT A, ARTICLE THREE, SECTION 45 B NINE RELATED TO THE LOT WIDTH FOR GOMEZ SUBDIVISION. THAT'S TWO LOTS ON 2.407 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING ON PARCELS 547924 AND 843742, ALSO KNOWN AS 15507 AND 15509. SCHMIDT LOOP IN MANOR, TEXAS. THE APPLICANT IS FOR SURVEYING AND MAPPING. THE OWNER IS MARGARITA ARROYO GOMEZ. I HAVE NO ONE SIGNED UP FOR TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. SO STAFF, IF YOU WANT TO ADDRESS THIS, I KNOW THIS WAS ON THE AGENDA THAT WE HAD TO POSTPONE. SURE. SO THIS THESE PLOTS ARE IN THE CITY'S ETJ. THEY'RE NORTH OF THE CITY. AND SO WE DON'T REGULATE LAND USE. WE JUST DO SUBDIVISION AND SIGNS. AND SO THEY HAVE TO FILE A PLAT WITH THE CITY TO CREATE THESE LEGAL LOTS. THEY. MOST INSTANCES WHEN THIS OCCURS IS THEY ARE WORKING WITH TRAVIS COUNTY TO RENEW A SEPTIC PERMIT OR THEY NEED FROM THE WATER PROVIDER OR ANOTHER WATER METER. AND THOSE ENTITIES TYPICALLY WILL ACQUIRE A LEGAL LOT TO SET THOSE METERS OR ISSUE THOSE PERMITS. AND SO THIS ONE, YOU KNOW, THEY HAD TO FILE A PLAT, BUT IT DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE CITY'S CURRENT SUBDIVISION CODE. AS YOU CAN SEE, IT IS QUITE NARROW. AND IT IS ALSO VERY DEEP. SO IT DOES NOT MEET THE CITY'S MINIMUM LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT ON A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. AND THE LOT TO DEPTH RATIO EXCEEDS THE TWO AND A HALF TO ONE THAT THE CODE REQUIRES. HOWEVER, THE THE CURRENT OWNER AND APPLICANT OR CURRENT OWNER AND YOU KNOW WHO HIRED THE APPLICANT FOR THEM TO, YOU KNOW, RESOLVE THE ISSUE AND HAVE COMPLIANT LOTS, THEY WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE TO BUY THEIR NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY, WHICH IS A PRETTY STEEP ASK AND IT'S QUITE A HARDSHIP ON THEM. AND SO WHEN YOU GET TO THE ACTION ITEM, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS PLOT. WITH THESE VARIANCES, THEY DO MAINTAIN THE EXISTING LOT WIDTHS THAT THE THE CURRENT CONFIGURATION. THIS ESSENTIALLY CREATES A FLAG LOT FOR THE BACK LOT. YES. WHERE THE DRIVEWAY WIDTH TO THE WE. THE EXEMPTION THAT WE'RE CREATING IS ALLOWING FOR AN EXEMPTION TO THE CODE FOR THAT DRIVEWAY WIDTH FROM THE CURB.
WELL, THERE'S NO CURB ON INSTRUMENT LOOP, BUT FROM SCHMITT LOOP TO THE BACK END OF THE LOT WHERE IT WIDENS TO THE FULL WIDTH. YES. OKAY. YES, YES. SO IT IS CREATING ONCE RECORDED, IT'LL HAVE TWO LEGAL LOTS AT A MINIMUM ONE ACRE EACH. YEAH. YES. ONE ACRE AND THEN 1.4 ACRES. THE ACREAGE THE SIZE OF THE LOTS ACTUALLY DOESN'T CHANGE. THEY SORT OF, YOU KNOW, MOVED A LOT LINES AROUND, BUT THE ACREAGES END UP COMING OUT THE SAME AS THEY CURRENTLY ARE JUST A DIFFERENT CONFIGURATION. OKAY. AND THIS HAS BEEN ONGOING SINCE, YOU KNOW, THE 70S IS SORT OF WHEN THIS FIRST STARTED GETTING PLOTTED OUT. SO IT'S, IT'S BEEN QUITE A FEW NUMBER OF DECADES. YEAH. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONERS. LET'S TALK ABOUT FLAG LOTS LATER. NO, I'M JUST KIDDING. ALL RIGHT. IF YOU HAVE NO QUESTIONS, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON ITEM THREE. I MOVE
[00:25:06]
TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM THREE, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MEYER TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TERRY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT. MOTION PASSES, SEVEN ZERO, I BELIEVE. CORRECT, TERRY? YEP. RIGHT. ITEM FOUR, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR KIMBRO CROSSING BEING 17 LOTS ON 52.69 ACRES MORE OR LESS AND BEING A PARCELS 236951, ALSO KNOWN AS 14018 EAST US HIGHWAY 290 IN MANOR. THE APPLICANT IS BARON STARK ENGINEERS L.P. THE OWNER IS TIMBERMAN COMMERCIAL INVESTMENTS LP. MR. BATTLE, YOU ARE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES FROM WHEN YOU START SPEAKING, TWO MINUTES FROM WHEN YOU START SPEAKING. THANK YOU. YES, MY NAME IS ROBERT BATTLE. I DON'T THINK THE PEOPLE IN THIS ROOM ARE REALLY TAKEN PERSONALLY. HOW THOROUGH I AM AT THIS LAWSUIT. THIS IS THE WITNESS LIST, OKAY? I HAVE A DEFENDANT LIST. I HAVE A PERSONALLY LIST OF PEOPLE I'M PERSONALLY GOING TO SUE. OKAY, SO NOW IN THIS ONE, I'M LOOKING. I DON'T HAVE THE PLAT MAP IN FRONT OF ME. I'VE HAD TO SPEND A LOT OF TIME SENDING A LETTER TO YOU GUYS THAT YOU PROBABLY HAVEN'T EVEN GOTTEN YET, BECAUSE HE SLOW WALKS EVERYTHING I SENT HIM.HE'S YOUR SENSOR. SOMEDAY YOU'LL GET HIM OUT HERE IN THE AUDIENCE WHERE HE BELONGS. OKAY, NOW MY POINT FOR THIS ONE IS BARON STARK ENGINEERS. IF YOU CLAIM PARKLAND AND IT'S A WATER DITCH, I'M GOING TO SUE YOU PERSONALLY. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? I'M ALREADY SUING ZIMMERMAN PERSONALLY ON ABOUT SIX ISSUES HE'S STOLEN FROM US RIGHT, LEFT AND CENTER. HE'S BEEN WORKING ON THE PUBLIC IMPACT FEES. WE'VE GIVEN HIM $8 MILLION. HE WON'T PUT A PAUSE IN. THESE RICH PEOPLE ARE THE CHEAPEST BASTARDS YOU WILL EVER MEET. THEY'RE POOR WHITE TRASH. OKAY, NOW THEY'RE SMART, BUT THEY HAVE NO CLASS. PETE DWYER DID NOT EVEN KNOW WHAT A PLAZA WAS.
EVERY LITTLE TOWN IN MEXICO HAS A PLAZA. THESE PEOPLE NEED A PLAZA, DON'T THEY? IT'S 52.69 ACRES. I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH COMMERCIAL IS, SO IF I'VE MISSED SOMETHING HERE, MY POINT FOR THIS, THEN LET'S TALK ABOUT. I WANT TO HEAR THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. SO I WANT THIS MAN OVER HERE WHO'S BEEN HIDING PARK FEES. I'M TALKING ABOUT MR. BURRELL. I WANT TO KNOW EXACTLY HOW MUCH PARK FEES, HOW MUCH IN LIEU FEES. AND YOU NEED TO SOMETIME LEARN WHAT A WORKSHEET IS BECAUSE I DID A I DID A FOIA REQUEST, AND THE CITY ATTORNEYS SENT ME A PIECE OF WORTHLESS CRAP ABOUT $150,000. WHEN THAT. THIS IS THE MANNER, YOU KNOW, IT'S THE VIEW AT MANOR CROSSING. THE VIEW IS, OF COURSE, THE BACK OF H-E-B. BOY, THAT'S QUITE A VIEW.
IT USED TO BE THE PARK UNTIL I POINTED OUT THEY HAVE NO PARKLAND. WELL, THEY ADMITTED IN COURT THE ATTORNEY WAS SO DUMB, HE ADMITTED IN COURT THAT THEY HAD STOLEN OR THEY ONLY PAID ON ONE OF TWO PARCELS. SO ME, MR. BRAINIAC SAYS, WELL, THEY ONLY PAID ON ONE. THAT MEANS THEY DIDN'T PAY ON ONE. SO I WENT TO FIND OUT THAT. AND YOU WOULDN'T EVEN GIVE ME A WORKSHEET. YOU GAVE ME ONE GIANT STUB OF PAPER SAYS 100 HAS EXPIRED. OH. I'M SORRY.
THANK YOU. GOSH, I WAS JUST HAVING FUN. I WAS JUST GETTING GOING. WHY DID YOU GET SPUN UP? PARDON ME? WHY DID YOU GET SPUN UP TIMES UP, SPUN UP? I SAID IT WAS FUN. YEAH. STAFF, DO YOU WANT TO THIS THIS THIS HAS BEEN SLIGHTLY AMENDED, AT LEAST FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. THIS IS.
WE CAN TALK. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR ANYTHING THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE ON THIS. THIS IS ESSENTIALLY THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OR. YEAH. FOR THAT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. YES. I WENT THROUGH IT QUICK AT THE MARCH MEETING. I BELIEVE THE CONCEPT PLAN WAS APPROVED. AND SO THIS IS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT THAT WAS FILED CONCURRENTLY FOR THE KIMBALL CROSSING SUBDIVISION, WHICH IS A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION. IT DOES INCLUDE A RESIDENTIAL LOT, FUTURE RESIDENTIAL LOT. THAT RESIDENTIAL LOT IS CURRENTLY ZONED COMMERCIAL, BUT THIS PLAT CONTEMPLATES THE BACK PORTION BEING RESIDENTIAL. IT IS A 17 LOTS WITH MOSTLY 14 COMMERCIAL LOTS, ONE RESIDENTIAL LOT AND ONE MENTIONED IN THE BACK PARKLAND LOT AND DRAINAGE LOT, WHICH IS A 17. THEY HAVE WORKED OUT. THE MAJORITY OF THE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS ARE WITH TXDOT, AND SO TXDOT IS HANDLING THOSE AND COORDINATING THOSE IMPROVEMENTS. THERE IS PROPOSED RIGHT TURN LANE ON KIMBROUGH, WHICH WOULD BE A CITY STREET. BUT THE MAJORITY OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING FACILITATED THROUGH TXDOT. AND THE ONE MODIFICATION, WHEN YOU GET TO THE ACTION ITEM, THERE'S SOME TWEAKING WE HAVE TO DO WITH THE EASEMENTS THAT THEY'VE SHOWN ON THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT. SO AS THEY CARRY IT THROUGH WITH THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, THE FINAL PLATS, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE THE EASEMENTS IN PLACE, WHETHER THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, PRIVATE OR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE. SORRY. SO JUST BE ASKING WHEN YOU GET
[00:30:01]
TO THE ACTION ITEM THAT YOU THAT IT IS APPROVED WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE EASEMENTS ARE CORRECTED. SO THIS USED TO BE THAT DRIVING RANGE, RIGHT? SO NO DETAIL ON THE PLATS AND PARKLAND, NO DETAIL AT ALL. THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE A HEARING SIR. SORRY. WHAT WAS YOUR QUESTION. DIDN'T I USED TO BE THAT DRIVING RANGE ON 290. YES. YES. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS COMMISSIONERS. IF NONE I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM FOUR. I MAKE A MOTION. WE CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING NUMBER FOUR, A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND, A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER. WAS THAT OH, IT WAS PAES AGAIN. ALL RIGHT. MENDOZA ON THE MOTION. PAES ON THE SECOND. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? HEARING NONE. SEEING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES SEVEN ZERO. GETS US ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA. ALL THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED TO BE SELF-EXPLANATORY BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, AND WILL BE ACTED UPON WITH ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE CHAIR, WHICH IT WILL BE OR COMMISSIONER, IN WHICH EVENT THE ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. THESE INCLUDE ITEMS FIVE AND SIX, WHICH ARE THE MINUTES FROM THE MARCH 11TH AND APRIL 6TH.PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REQUESTS FOR STAFF REALLY QUICK ON THE THE MOTION SHEET OR ON THE MINUTES THAT ARE. FOR THE APRIL 8TH MEETING, THERE WAS NO QUORUM. THERE IS NO RECORD OF.
THE ITEMS THAT WERE ADMINISTRATIVELY ACTED UPON. IS THAT STANDARD PROTOCOL OR SHOULD THAT BE RECORDED IN THE MINUTES? ARE YOU SPEAKING OF ITEM SIX LIKE THAT ONE? ITEM SIX. YES. ITEM SIX. I'M SORRY. YES. THAT GOES INTO THE MINUTES FOR THIS MEETING. SO IT'S A REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS FOR THE DRAFT MINUTES. AND I'LL REFER TO THIS BECAUSE I BELIEVE SHE DRAFTED THESE MINUTES. THE MINUTES ONLY STATE REGULAR SESSION 6:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCED QUORUM IS PRESENT WITH NO QUORUM PRESENT OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. PRESENT. THE REGULAR SESSION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WAS CANCELED BY CHAIR STENSLAND AT 6:45 P.M. ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 6TH, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL, 105 EAST 10TH STREET, MAYNARD, TEXAS. TECHNICALLY, AND THEN IT SAYS ADJOURNMENT TECHNICALLY, BECAUSE THERE WAS I DIDN'T CANCEL THE MEETING, BUT I DECLARED THAT THERE WAS NO QUORUM PRESENT. THERE WERE SEVERAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS THAT WERE TAKEN BECAUSE OF THE SHOT CLOCK AND IN THE CITY CODE THAT ARE NOT RECORDED IN THESE MINUTES, AND I WOULD EXPECT THAT THOSE WOULD BE RECORDED, OR I GUESS I WOULD PROTEST THAT THESE THOSE NEED TO BE INCORPORATED BEFORE BEFORE I WOULD BE COMFORTABLE ADOPTING THEM. SO CITY LEGAL IS THE ONE WHO PROVIDED FOR THE STAFF REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS RESULTING FROM THE APRIL NO QUORUM, AND THAT THAT WOULD BE PART OF THE STAFF. THE AGENDA FOR THIS. SORRY. YOU'RE RIGHT. ITEM. HI. LONG TIME READER, FIRST TIME TALKER. I SEE NOW ITEM SIX, ITEM FIVE. I THINK FIVE OF C WAS WHAT I WAS LOOKING AT ORIGINALLY. OKAY, OKAY, SO FIVE FIVE C IS JUST THE THE DRAFT MINUTES. THE STAFF REPORT IN SIX B PROVIDES THE THE ACTIONS THAT WERE TAKEN IN ABSENCE OF A QUORUM. OKAY. I WILL RESCIND MY REQUEST TO SEPARATE THOSE. AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR THE CONSENT AGENDA. THIS IS SEPARATE. CORRECT. SO WE HAVE TO DO FIVE MIN SIX. OH YEAH. BECAUSE I YEAH YOU COULD READ BOTH FIVE AND WE COULD READ FIVE AND SIX SEPARATELY IF YOU'D LIKE. YEAH. I'M JUST ASKING. YEAH.
I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS FIVE AND SIX. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER PIKE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 765 A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY MENDOZA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED THAT? MOTION PASSES SEVEN ZERO. THANK
[00:35:02]
YOU AND THANKS FOR THAT LITTLE JOURNEY THERE. ITEM SEVEN IS CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR 15,000FTā !S OF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE, MEDICAL OFFICE AND MEDICAL CLINIC ON ONE LOT ON 3.11 ACRES MORE OR LESS BEING LOCATED AT 13801 NORTH FM 973 IN MANOR, TEXAS. THE APPLICANT IS RAFIQ AND HE IS HERE. THE OWNER IS PLATINUM 973 LLC. AS STAFF HAD MENTIONED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, THIS IS A REQUEST TO ZONE OR TO APPLY THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO THE ENTIRE TWO BUILDINGS THAT ARE IN UP TO THE ENTIRE TWO BUILDINGS THAT ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED RIGHT NOW ON THE PROPERTY AND STAFF. DO YOU WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT LIKE CONSOLIDATION AND KIND OF THIS KIND OF GOES BACK TO THE GOLD.I KEEP CALLING IT GOLDEN ACRES AND SILVER ACRES, MAYBE WE'LL CALL IT COPPER. BUT YEAH, SURE.
SO THIS PROPERTY, HAVING BEEN ANNEXED AFTER THE ESD DID THEIR SALES TAX COLLECTION, WE DO NOT COLLECT SALES TAX ON THIS PROPERTY. SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE RECOMMENDING A LARGER PERCENTAGE OF THESE NON SALES TAX SHARING USES. YOU ARE ABLE TO DO ANY AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE LESS THAN 1500 OR 15,000. THAT THAT IS JUST THE FULL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THOSE TWO BUILDINGS. BUT IT IS NOT WHAT YOU NEED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL, BUT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING IT BECAUSE IT'S IT MAY BE ABLE TO CONSOLIDATE THESE TYPES OF MEDICAL AND OFFICE USES FROM ELSEWHERE IN THE CITY THAT DO COLLECT SALES TAX. SO JUST TO CLARIFY, STAFF.
SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE PHASE TWO BUILDINGS PLAN NORTH IN THIS DRAWING. RIGHT. THE TWO ON THE NORTH SIDE. YES. CORRECT. YES. THANK YOU. MISTER, ARE YOU ALL WHERE ARE YOU ALL IN THE LEASE NEGOTIATING PROCESS. ARE YOU AT A POINT OF OF ARE YOU SEEING 15 ARE YOU SEEING 100% UTILIZATION FOR SUP? NO, WE MIGHT HAVE.
WELCOME TO THE FUN SIDE OF THAT LEASE DISCUSSION. OKAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH. SO AT LEAST HALF OF IT WOULD BE NOW, BUT THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR IN PERPETUITY IF THOSE TENANTS WERE TO SOME PEOPLE ALSO KIND OF THIS IS ALSO THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE MET. YEAH. PARDON I BELIEVE IS YOUR MICROPHONE ON. YEAH. OH SORRY. CAN YOU HIT THE LITTLE RED. CAN YOU HIT THE GREEN BUTTON. SO ON THE ON YOUR THING. OKAY. GOT IT. YEAH. OKAY. THERE WE GO. OH OKAY. A LITTLE LIGHT ON THERE. THANK YOU. YEAH. DO YOU MIND JUST SAYING REALLY QUICK, JUST FOR THE RECORD, WHAT YOU JUST STATED. I'M SO SORRY. SURE. MY NAME IS RAFIQ HARIRI AND I'M PRESENTING RETAIL BUILDING ON 973. SO THE TOTAL BUILDING, WE HAVE A 12 TENANTS. OUT OF THE 12 TENANTS, WE MIGHT HAVE SIX TENANTS WILL BE MEDICAL USE ONLY OR PROFESSIONAL USE FOR TAX PURPOSES OR INSURANCE PLACE LIKE THAT. OTHER SIX TENANT WILL BE MIXED USE FOR PILATES OR SOMETHING ELSE. SO IT'S NOT GOING TO BE 100% MEDICAL USE ONLY. YEAH. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS? IT SEEMS LIKE IF I'M UNDERSTANDING THIS CORRECTLY, WE PROBABLY DON'T HAVE THE SAME ISSUE WE HAVE AT SOME OF THESE OTHER LOTS, ESPECIALLY FRONTING FM OR 290, WHERE THOSE ARE SORT OF PRIME REAL ESTATE. I KNOW YOU'RE CALLING THEM YOUR GOLD LOTS. I LIKE THAT AS WELL AS ANYTHING. SO WE DON'T HAVE THAT SAME ISSUE HERE, SEEING AS WE CAN'T COLLECT SALES TAX ON THIS LOT ANYWAY. YEAH. CORRECT. YEAH.
STAFF, IF YOU WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT KIND OF FROM AND THIS KIND OF ALIGNS THE KIND OF MY PERSPECTIVE OF LIKE, WE HAD THIS DISCUSSION WHEN WE HAD THAT EMERGENCY ROOM COME UP ON A SALES TAX GENERATING LOT. IT'S LIKE, OKAY, WE HAD A LOT OF DISCUSSIONS ON OTHER PROPERTY. I MADE HER COMMENTS. IT WAS IT CAME THROUGH AND ALL OF A SUDDEN WE GOT 15 TO 20% OF THAT PROPERTY THAT'S NOW NOT GENERATING SALES TAX. WE DON'T HAVE AS MANY. WE HAVE VERY FEW PARCELS THAT ARE IN OUR JURISDICTION TO COLLECT SALES TAX, BECAUSE THE SALES TAX COLLECTION THAT HAPPENED WITH THE ESD AND MAYBE, YEAH, MAYBE TO PUT PUT A DIFFERENT SPIN ON THE QUESTION. IT SEEMS LIKE WE WOULD WANT EXACTLY THIS MIX OF LAND USES ON A LOT SUCH AS THIS. CORRECT. AND CLUSTERING, WHEN POSSIBLE, IS THAT YES, THAT ALIGNS WITH MY RECOMMENDATION. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON ITEM
[00:40:10]
SEVEN. THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR. CURTI. THANK YOU. I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THIS ITEM. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MEYER TO APPROVE ITEM SEVEN AS PRESENTED. I HAVE A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER AUBERT. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? SEEING THE QUESTIONS. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED THAT? MOTION PASSES SEVEN ZERO. THANK YOU, MR. CARIDDI. ITEM EIGHT IS CONSIDERATION. DISCUSSION.POSSIBLE ACTION ON A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR WHAT'S POSTED AS 5725FTā !S OF MEDICAL OFFICE, ONE LOT ON 6.76 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING LOST IN TROTTA'S NORTH, ALSO KNOWN AS 12420 TIOGA PASS IN MAINE OR TEXAS. THE APPLICANT IS L.B. LAS ENTRADAS REG LP. THE OWNER IS OF THE SAME STAFF. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT GOLDEN ACRES NOW, AND I BELIEVE A REDUCED SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THIS, CORRECT? YES. AFTER IT WAS NOTIFIED FOR IT WAS REDUCED TO 2200FTā !S IN THE SHOPS. ONE BUILDING, WHICH IS THE ONE THAT HAS TWO E'S IN THE PLOTS, THAT FRONTS US. 290. BUT YES, THIS IS THE PROPERTY THAT WE DO COLLECT SALES TAX. WE ARE STAFF IS STILL RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. YOU KNOW, THIS IS THE THE ONLY USE RIGHT NOW THAT WOULD REQUIRE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT ON THE PROPERTY AND OF THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF WHAT'S BUILT AND PROPOSED TO BE BUILT IN THEIR THIRD PHASE, WHICH IS 9000FTā !S. THIS REPRESENTS 4.4% OF THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE. BUT AS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM UNDER COMMUNITY MIXED USE, THAT RECOMMENDS 40% IN OFFICE USES. SO IT HAS A SMALLER AMOUNT OF RETAIL, MORE OFFICE.
AND SO EVEN WITH THIS MEDICAL OFFICE USE AND INCLUDING THE FROST BANK AND THE ACTION PAVEMENT CENTER, IT IS STILL BELOW THAT 40% THRESHOLD. SO IT STILL ALIGNS WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. STAFF. I DO WANT TO KIND OF, I GUESS, RAISE MY POINT OR MY CONCERN IS WITH THEIR CURRENT BUILD OUT OR THEIR CURRENT LEASING PRACTICES, THEY'RE NOT THEY'RE REALLY FAR OFF FROM OUR QUOTAS. SO ESSENTIALLY AFTER APPROVING THIS, THEY WOULD HAVE TO DO 100% RETAIL IN THE REMAINING 38% IN ORDER TO GET CLOSE TO THAT MIX OF 50%, 50% RETAIL, 40% OFFICE, 10% OTHER, INCLUDING CIVIC USES. SO I'M RELUCTANTLY HESITANT ON THIS ONE. I DO KNOW THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ONLY 2200FTā !S NO, BUT THAT'S IN ADDITION TO ALREADY HAVING. THAT'LL MEAN I MEAN, IT PUTS A LOT MORE PRESSURE ON THAT REMAINING 19,000FTā !S TO CONVERT. SO DO WE HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THEM? HI. TALK TO ME A LITTLE BIT ABOUT YOUR PROPERTY. AND YOU NOW, NOW KNOW THAT YOU IT WAS A RED LIGHT IS GOOD. RED LIGHT. I KNOW IT'S LIKE A RIGHT. IT'S LIKE A GREEN AND RED AND YEAH, NOW YOU KNOW THAT YOU'RE ON A GOLDEN ACRE, AS I CALL IT HERE. NOW YOU KNOW THAT YOU ARE ON A GOLDEN ACRE IN, IN THE CITY OF MEANING THAT WE CAN COLLECT SALES TAX FROM YOU, WHICH ALSO MEANS THAT WE CAN DO INCENTIVE DEALS OR ANYTHING ELSE THAT WE WOULD NEED TO DO IN THAT TYPE OF THING. CAN YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT LIKE, I KNOW YOU GUYS HAVE THE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH TAKING UP A LARGE PORTION OF THIS PHASE ONE, THE SCHOOL. YES. YEAH. AND THEN THIS WOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL 2200FTā !S THAT WOULD BE DEDICATED SPECIFICALLY FOR A MEDICAL USE. YEAH. AND I HAD A PRESENTATION, I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S AVAILABLE. NO. OH, OKAY. AND I BELIEVE ARE YOU PAT SAUER? NO. WHAT'S YOUR NAME? DANIEL CAMPBELL. DANIEL CAMPBELL, THANK YOU SO MUCH. YEP. I'M WITH THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY. YES. THAT'S RIGHT. YEAH. SO SO WE HEARD YOU GUYS ON THE SALES TAX. WHEN WE ORIGINALLY OFFERED OUR ASKED FOR 13,000. WE AMEND THAT DOWN TO 57, 25. AND REALLY WE ADMITTED IT DOWN. IT'S ACTUALLY 2225FTā !S. IN ORDER TO ALLOW A DENTIST, DECA DENTAL TO NATIONAL DENTAL PRACTICE. AND PART OF THE REASON FOR THAT IS WHAT WE'VE IDENTIFIED IN MAINERS THAT MAINER HAS A LACK OF OF DENTIST HAS AS SHORT AS A DENTIST. AND THE PRESENTATION THAT WE HAD HAD A HAD A CHART FROM THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION THAT SHOWED THAT THE AVERAGE AMOUNT OF DENTISTS FOR A POPULATION IS ABOUT ONE PER 300. AND GIVEN THE. WHERE MAINER IS THAT MAINER CURRENTLY HAS ABOUT NINE DENTISTS IN THE MARKET, SEVEN NORMAL KIND OF GENERAL DENTIST AND ONE PEDIATRIC, AND THEN ONE THAT'S MAINLY FOR DENTURES AND SUCH.
[00:45:02]
AND. AND SO WITH THAT, AND GIVEN MAINERS POPULATION OF ABOUT 34,000, OUR DATA SHOWS THAT MAINERS LACKING ABOUT NINE DENTISTS CURRENTLY. AND SO EVEN AS THE CITY GROWS, IT NEEDS TO BE ABLE TO HAVE A. SERVICES THAT CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE COMMUNITY. AND PART OF WHAT THESE. THE NICE THING ABOUT THESE JOBS IS THAT THEY'RE HIGH PAYING JOBS. THESE ARE DENTISTS, THESE ARE DENTAL HYGIENISTS. THESE ARE GOOD, GOOD JOBS THAT WOULD PAY HIGHER THAN TYPICAL RETAIL SALARIES. AND THE OTHER KIND OF IDEA BEHIND THIS IS THAT IT IS A COMPLEMENTARY USE.SO WE HAVE WE HAVE CHUBBIES NEXT DOOR TO THEM. WE HAVE EINSTEIN'S BAGELS ON THE OTHER SIDE. WE'RE NEGOTIATING WITH TWO RESTAURANTS TO GO IN OUR SHOPS, TWO BUILDING AND A THIRD RESTAURANT TO GO IN THE MIDDLE. SO WE'RE KIND OF MAXIMIZING THE AMOUNT OF RESTAURANTS WE CAN DO, GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF PARKING. AND HAVING A DENTIST NEXT TO ALL OF THESE FOLKS REALLY WORKS WELL. AND PART OF THAT COMPLEMENTARY USE IS THAT IF YOU THINK ABOUT SOMEBODY WHO'S BOOKING A DENTAL VISIT DURING LUNCH, THEY COME HOME FROM LUNCH OR THEY GO TO THE, THEY GO TO THE DENTIST AT LUNCH, THEY COME OUT, THEY EITHER, YOU KNOW, GO TO CHEWY'S AND GRAB A MEAL THERE, OR THEY GO TO EINSTEIN'S AND GRAB A BAGEL, OR THEY GO IN BEFORE, BEFORE WORK AND GRAB A COFFEE ON THE WAY IN. WE WANT THOSE DOLLARS TO STAY IN MAINER. AND IF THOSE GUYS HAVE TO GO, THOSE THOSE PATIENTS HAVE TO GO OUTSIDE OF MAINER TO GET THOSE SERVICES, THOSE DENTAL SERVICES, THEN WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO IS THEY'RE GOING TO SPEND THAT THOSE THOSE LUNCH DOLLARS, THOSE BREAKFAST DOLLARS, THOSE DINNER DOLLARS IN AUSTIN AND IN ELGIN AND NOT HERE IN MAINER. AND WITH OUR PROJECT, WE'VE DEVELOPED ABOUT 5100 ZERO SQUARE FEET. SO WE GO FROM BOJANGLES TO FROST BANK AND EVERYTHING IN THE BACK. THERE IS NO CHAPTER 380 AGREEMENT. SO THE CITY GETS 100% OF THE SALES TAX THAT GO TO IT. OUR PROJECTIONS SHOW THAT IN THE FIRST YEAR, INCLUDING ALL THE USES YOU TALKED ABOUT, MR. CHAIRMAN, THAT THE CITY WILL GENERATE ABOUT $137,000 IN SALES TAX, NEW SALES TAX TO THE CITY. AND IN ADDITION TO THAT, PRIOR TO US DEVELOPING OUR PROJECT, THE PROPERTY TAX TO THE CITY AND TO THE ISD PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT WAS ABOUT 4000. AND THIS YEAR, WITH THE BUILDINGS WE'VE BUILT WITH BOJANGLES, WITH BRICKS PLUS WITH FROST BANK, THAT'LL GO UP TO ABOUT 380 000. SO COMBINED THIS YEAR FROM OUR PROJECT, THE CITY WILL GET CITY AND ISD WILL GET A COMBINED 500 ZERO ZERO $0 IN ADDITIONAL TAXES, WHICH WE'RE SUPER PROUD OF BECAUSE THAT ALLOWS YOU ALL TO DO TO DO YOUR JOB WELL. AND SO FOR US, WHAT WE REALLY SEE WITH THIS USE IS, IS DENTISTS ARE NEEDED. IT'S A COMPLIMENTARY USE, IT'S A RETAIL USE. SO THIS IS NOT A, THIS IS A, A RETAIL MEDICAL USE. AND THAT THEY ENJOY THE CONVENIENCE OF BEING, YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE GOING TO DENTIST, YOU WANT TO GO UP A FOUR STORY BUILDING AND FIGHT GURNEYS AND THOSE TYPES OF MEDICAL TYPE THINGS. YOU WANT TO GO IN AND GET YOUR TEETH CLEANED AND COME BACK OUT AND GO. IT'S A CONVENIENCE TYPE BUSINESS, AND THAT'S WHY IT'S REALLY WELL SUITED TO BE AS PART OF OUR PART OF OUR PROJECT. THANK YOU SIR. COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT OR OF STAFF? AND FOR CLARIFICATION, YOU SAID 2225FTā !S IS THE IS THE NOW SETTLED? NO. I PUT THAT NOTE ON MY AS WELL, IF THAT'S OKAY WITH STAFF. AND ONE ADDITIONAL COMMENT WITH THE OTHER AS WELL. THAT'S ALL RIGHT, I COME ON UP PLEASE. ARE YOU REALLY WITH THE OWNER THOUGH? EVERYONE SAYS THEY'RE WITH THE OWNER. NO, I'M JUST KIDDING, I PROMISE. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF. FOR THE RECORD, DANIEL FRYE WITH. OH. YEP.
HELLO? MR. FRYE, I DID, I DID, YES. SO IN ADDITION TO THIS, AT ONE POINT HE FORGOT TO LEAVE OUT. THIS IS ACTUALLY A COME ON UP AND PULL IN A SALES TAX PAYING DENTIST. THEY HAVE PROPRIETARY TOOTHPASTE AND TOOTHBRUSHES THAT THEY DO SELL TO CONSUMERS. SO THIS IS NOT A ZERO SUM GAME FOR YOU GUYS ON THIS. SO WE'VE HEARD YOU LOUD AND CLEAR. WE'VE DONE THE HOMEWORK. WE UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS FOR YOU GUYS. AGAIN THE ORIGINAL REQUEST WAS 13000. WE CAME IN AT FIVE. WE UNDERSTAND THAT MAY BE TOO MUCH. WE'RE VERY SENSITIVE TO THAT.
NOW WE'RE DOWN TO 2225. SO THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. A LOT TO CHEW ON.
NO DAD JOKES REALLY. COME ON. I'VE BEEN I'VE BEEN AN UNCLE THE LAST MONTH. IT'S BEEN KIND OF FUN. GOT AN EIGHT YEAR OLD AND A 17 YEAR OLD TO ENTERTAIN. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION OR ANY KIND OF OTHER QUESTIONS. JUST TO CLARIFY WITH STAFF. SO THE COMMERCIAL MIXED USE THAT THIS FALLS UNDER. THE THRESHOLD WAS UP TO 40%, CORRECT? CORRECT. YES. THE FROM THE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND THE, THE DASHBOARD THAT WE HAVE THAT RECOMMENDS, YOU KNOW, LAND USES WITHIN THOSE DESIGNATIONS. IT IS SPLIT 5050 BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL AND
[00:50:06]
50% COMMERCIAL IS THEN FURTHER SPLIT TO BE 50% RETAIL, 40% OFFICE AND 10% OTHER, WHICH COULD BE LIKE CIVIC USES. GREAT. THANK YOU. STILL CHEWING. MR. PIES? I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE REGULAR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER EIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER PIES TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM EIGHT AS POSTED OR AS IN THE BACKUP OR AS REQUESTED BY THE APPLICANT.SORRY, I'M SEEKING CLARIFICATION. SO ARE WE GOING FOR THE 2225? IS THAT CORRECT? IT'S WHATEVER YOU WANT. IT'S YOUR MOTION. WE'LL TALK ABOUT IT. I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR 2225 SQUARE FOOT MEDICAL OFFICE, AND ONE LOT ON 6.7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS BEING LESS LOSS ENTERITIS NORTH, ALSO KNOWN AS 1242 TAILGATE PASS, MAYNARD, TEXAS. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER PIES FOR THE MODIFIED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ITEM EIGHT FOR 2225FTā !S. DO I HAVE A SECOND TO THAT MOTION? I'LL SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TERRY. DO I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? ANY QUESTIONS? THE MOTION. SEEING NONE AND HEARING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.
OPPOSED THAT PASSES 6 TO 1. I COULD HAVE BEEN THE NAYSAYER HERE TOO. THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN FUN. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING RECEPTIVE TO OUR GUIDANCE. TO. ALL RIGHT, THAT PASSES 6 TO 1. WE ARE ON TO ITEM NINE CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A SHORT FORM FINAL PLAT WITH VARIANCES TO CHAPTER TEN. EXHIBIT A, ARTICLE THREE, SECTION 45 B EIGHT. AND ALSO RELATED TO THE WIDTH AND DEPTH RATIO AND AS WELL AS THAT SECTION, SUBSECTION NINE, RELATED TO THE WIDTH OF THE LOT FOR THE SUBDIVISION. THIS IS FOR TWO LOTS ON 2.407 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING TCAD PARCELS 4547924 AND 843742. ALSO KNOWN AS 1550715509.
SCHMIDT LOOP IN MENARD, TEXAS. THE APPLICANT IS FOR SURVEYING AND MAPPING THE OWNER AGAIN.
MARGARITA ARROYO GOMEZ STAFF, YOU EXPLAINED THIS IS FOR THAT FLAG LOT WITH A ONE ACRE IN THE BACK AND 1.47 ACRES, I THINK IN THE FRONT OR VICE VERSA ON A VERY SKINNY LOT BECAUSE WE LOVE OUR SKINNY THOUSAND FOOT LONG LOTS IN MANER. I'VE NEVER UNDERSTOOD. STAFF EXPLAINED HOW WE GOT TO THIS POINT IN THE 1970S, WITH 50 FOOT LOTS THAT GO 1000FT LONG. NO? SURE. SO I MEAN, WOULD IT NOT BEING A LEGAL LOT, IT WAS DIVIDED BY DEED. AND SO, YOU KNOW, THESE LOTS WERE CREATED. IT WAS JUST SOMEONE SAYING LIKE, HERE'S A METES AND BOUNDS AND A DEED AND NOW YOU'RE THE OWNER OF IT. AND THAT MAY HAVE WORKED FOR A TIME, BUT BETWEEN THE CITY AND TRAVIS COUNTY AND THE VARIOUS UTILITY ENTITIES, YOU KNOW, WE'RE WE REQUIRE PLATTED LOTS. NOW, TYPICALLY FOR ANY SORT OF DEVELOPMENT PERMIT METERS, THOSE TYPES OF THINGS. AND SO IT'S CATCHING UP TO A LOT OF PEOPLE, BUT THEY DO HAVE A GENUINE HARDSHIP THAT, YOU KNOW, THE OWNER DIDN'T CAUSE THIS. THEY DID NOT. THEY WERE NOT THE ONES TO DIVIDE IT. THEY WERE JUST THE PURCHASERS OF IT. WE DID WORK WITH THEM TO MINIMIZE THE THE VARIANCES AND THE REQUEST. THEY HAD ORIGINALLY CHANGED THE FRONTAGE, BUT THEY WERE KEEPING THE THE EXISTING LOT WIDTH AT THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. AND THEN IT SORT OF IT MODIFIES AS IT GOES BACK. BUT BY KEEPING THE LOT WEIGHTS AS THEY CURRENTLY ARE, IT MAINTAINS, YOU KNOW, THEIR, THEIR HARDSHIP WITH THIS VARIANCE. AND THEN, YOU KNOW, THEY REALLY CAN'T SOLVE THE LOT DEPTH RATIO UNLESS THEY ACTUALLY BUILD PUBLIC ROADS. AND THIS LOT IS SO NARROW THAT A PUBLIC ROAD WOULD TAKE UP PRETTY MUCH THE ENTIRE PROPERTY. AND SO THEY WOULD NEED, YOU KNOW, OTHER DEVELOPERS, OTHER PEOPLE, OR SOMEHOW TO ACQUIRE RIGHT OF WAY TO BUILD A ROAD TO SPLIT THESE LOTS TO DO THAT. SO THAT THAT HARDSHIP IS ALSO GENUINE. IT IS IT DOESN'T
[00:55:03]
NECESSARILY PROVIDE A SOLE BENEFIT TO THIS APPLICANT, BUT THERE ARE CERTAINLY, AS YOU RECOMMENDED, CHAIR, THERE ARE OTHER LOTS THAT ARE 1000FT DEEP. SO THIS MAY COME UP AS WE MOVE ALONG. BUT THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY DOES HAVE HARDSHIPS THAT ARE RECOGNIZED. AND YOUR BACKUP HAS THE CONSIDERATIONS AND FINDINGS RELATED TO THOSE HARDSHIPS. AND WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. THANK YOU. AND I BELIEVE TRAVIS COUNTY IS ALSO APPROVED THIS ALREADY BASED ON THE BACKUP. I DON'T KNOW WHERE IT STANDS WITH THEIR COMMISSION REPORT. IT IS FILED WITH TRAVIS COUNTY. TYPICALLY, THE COUNTY WAITS FOR OUR APPROVAL FIRST BEFORE THEY SCHEDULE IT FOR THEIR COMMISSIONERS COURT. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THERE'S A CONFORMANCE LETTER. ENGINEER COMMENTS IN RESPONSE IMAGES. IN THE INTEREST OF NOT CREATING A HARDSHIP, I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THIS AGENDA ITEM. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER MEYER. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER. TERRY. THANK YOU. IT'S BEEN A WEEK. MY GOODNESS. DO I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE MOTION? NO QUESTIONS ON THE MOTION. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED.MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0. ITEM TEN. WE'RE GETTING TOWARD THE END, Y'ALL. CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A SUBDIVISION. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR KIMBRO CROSSING BEING 17 LOTS ON 52.69 ACRES MORE OR LESS, AND BEING TAD PARCEL 236951, ALSO KNOWN AS 14018 EAST US HIGHWAY 290 IN MAYNARD, TEXAS. THE APPLICANT IS BARON STARK ENGINEERS LP, WHICH I BELIEVE IS HERE, AS WELL AS THE OWNER, TIMBERMAN COMMERCIAL INVESTMENTS LP STAFF. THIS IS THE. THE HOBBY LOBBY AND ACADEMY PROJECT WITH OTHERS TO BE DETERMINED. YES, THAT IS CORRECT. THERE'S EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS AND TAX INCENTIVE AGREEMENTS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR POTENTIAL HOBBY LOBBY AND ACADEMY WITHIN THIS COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER. AS WE SAID, YES, IT'S 17 LOTS. THERE'S 14 COMMERCIAL LOTS, ONE RESIDENTIAL LOT, PARKLAND LOT AND DRAINAGE LOT. AND LIKE I SAID, TEX-DOT IS HANDLING THE MAJORITY OF THE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO THIS PROJECT. AND THEN WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, BUT WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE EASEMENTS BE CORRECTED. SO THAT WAY THERE'S SOME STORM DRAIN EASEMENTS THAT WE'RE WORKING WITH THEM ON WHETHER THAT SHOULD BE PUBLIC OR NOT. AND THE PREFERENCE FOR THE CITY WAS THAT THE THAT THE INTERNAL STORM SYSTEM IS PRIVATE. SO WE'RE WORKING WITH THE DEVELOPER ON THAT. WE'VE HAD GOOD CONVERSATIONS TODAY ON IT. AND SO THERE'S NO MAJOR HICCUPS THERE. IT SHOULD BE WORKED OUT AND SHOULD PROBABLY BE BY THE END OF THIS WEEK, MAYBE NEXT WEEK, JUST MINOR TWEAKS TO THE EASEMENTS. AND THEN WE'RE WORKING WITH THEM AND THEIR ENGINEER ON THE CROSS CONNECTION BETWEEN THE PAD SITES ON THE FRONT. AND IF DEPENDING ON THE OPTIONS, THE COUPLE OPTIONS THAT ARE AVAILABLE, THAT MAY REQUIRE JOINT USE ACCESS EASEMENTS, OTHERWISE IT COULD BE DONE THROUGH DECLARATIONS AND PLAT NOTES ON THE FINAL PLAT. BUT IF IT DOES HIT A JOINT USE ACCESS EASEMENT, THOSE THAT NEED TO BE ADDED TO THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S JOINT DRIVEWAYS ALONG THE GUN LANE, RATHER THAN EACH PAD SITE HAVING ITS OWN DRIVEWAY, SO THAT WE WERE MINIMIZING THE AMOUNT OF CONNECTIONS TO THE CITY STREET AND CONFLICTS POINTS. DOES THIS TIE INTO DOES THAT TIE INTO FUTURE GUN LANE, I GUESS IS ENVISIONED? I THINK GUN LANE RIGHT NOW KIND OF LIKE SPLITS OFF TO THE RIGHT AND DEAD END SOMEWHERE BEHIND WHAT USED TO BE A MONUMENT OR NOT. THE MONUMENT ACROSS THE WAY.
YES, EXACTLY. SO GUN LANE CURRENTLY EXISTS OFF PASEO DE PRESIDENT. SO THE NEW MCDONALD'S THAT OPENED, THERE'S A LITTLE STUB STREET THAT'S REFERRED TO AS GUN LANE. AND THIS WOULD CONNECT TO THAT ONCE THE PARCEL IN BETWEEN IS DEVELOPED. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND I BELIEVE THE IT'S A RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT FOR THAT FOR GUN LANE ONTO KIMBROUGH. YES. THAT WOULD BE A RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT THERE WILL BE A MEDIAN. THE MEDIAN EXISTS CURRENTLY ON KIMBROUGH.
AND THEN THE THE THE CURB CUT WILL BE. THE MEDIAN CUT WILL BE FOR THE, THE BACK, THE 50 FOOT DRIVEWAY, CORRECT? YES, THAT IS CORRECT. THAT WAY THERE'S NOT CONFLICT POINTS WITH THE TWO PUBLIC ROADS AND THE INTERSECTION WITH 290. ALL RIGHT. AND TEX-DOT REQUIRED A TURN LANE ON OLD KIMBROUGH, IS THAT CORRECT? YES. THAT WAS PART OF THEIR LIST OF MITIGATIONS THAT ALLOWED THE TIA TO TO BE WAIVED AT THAT NORTHERN DRIVEWAY. SO THE THE
[01:00:09]
RIGHT TURN LANE IS ON SOUTHBOUND KIMBROUGH AT US 290. SO THOSE SHOULD BE THERE'S TWO LANES NOW. IT'LL BE THREE LANES. AND SO WE'RE WORKING WITH TXDOT ON HOW THAT IS ALIGNING WITH KIMBROUGH ON THE SOUTH SIDE, WHICH IS JUST TWO LANES. SO THERE'S NOT ENOUGH RECEIVING LANES ONCE YOU MOVE ACROSS. AND SO WE'RE WORKING WITH TEX-DOT AND PROBABLY HAVING A LEFT ONLY THROUGH AND A RIGHT ONLY. OKAY. GOTCHA. THANKS. AS I SAY, THAT'S GOING TO BE IT'S ALREADY KIND OF A MESSY INTERSECTION RIGHT NOW. WE HAVE A LOT OF NOT WE, BUT I SEE, I SEE MY FRIENDS CALLED FELLOW MAINER PEOPLE WHO LOVE TO JUST KIND OF PLOW TWO LANES INTO ONE AS THEY SCOOT ACROSS THE, THE TEX DOT TIME SIGNAL. SO IT'S, IT'S A MESSY SITE ON THE NORTH ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ROAD. BUT YEAH, WE'RE ALSO WORKING WITH THAT BECAUSE NOT RELATED TO THIS PLOT, BUT YES, THIS INCLUDES SOME SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AS WELL. AND SO THE, THE SIGNAL POLE IN THE MEDIAN OF 290 NEEDS TO BE SLIGHTLY RELOCATED. SO WE'RE WORKING WITH TEXAS TO SEE IF THERE COULD BE A SOMEWHAT MORE PERMANENT SOLUTION. OBVIOUSLY, YOU KNOW, THE TOLL EVENTUALLY COME THROUGH, BUT TO GET THAT SIGNAL IN THREE YEARS AGO. YEAH. BUT JUST GOT PUT IN.WE'RE LOOKING TO SEE IF WE CAN GET THE OR HAVE IT PREPARED, AT LEAST FOR THE CENTER PORTION TO BE WIDENED. SO THAT WAY WHEN THE SOUTHERN PORTION IS BUILT OUT, AS YOU KNOW, FOUR LANES, THE PORTION IN THE MIDDLE OF 290 DOESN'T ALSO NEED TO BE REWORKED, OKAY. OR AT LEAST THE SIGNAL WOULDN'T NEED TO BE REWORKED. OKAY. THERE'S A LOT GOING ON HERE. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE PLATT COMMISSIONERS? IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. THANK YOU FOR HAVING A NORTH JUSTIFIED MAP, BARON STARK. I JUST WANT TO LET THAT BE ON THE RECORD. I MAKE A MOTION. WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER TEN WITH THE CONDITION THAT WE MODIFY THE. WHAT WAS IT AGAIN? I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER EASEMENTS. YES, YES, YES. HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MENDOZA TO APPROVE ITEM TEN WITH THE MODIFIED EASEMENTS AS DISCUSSED WITH STAFF TODAY. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TERRY. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? HEARING NONE. SEEING NONE. OH YES. COMMISSIONER NILA. SO FOR THE ADJUSTMENTS, IS THAT PART OF THE NON-DISCRETIONARY SECTION? THAT'S SINCE THIS IS A NON-DISCRETIONARY ITEM. YES.
BEING SUBDIVISION THIS IS NON-DISCRETIONARY. SO TYPICALLY THE AVAILABLE OPTIONS YOU KNOW, APPROVE APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY FOR ENGINEERING COMMENTS. SO THERE ARE NOT COMMENTS ESSENTIALLY SORRY. YES APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS TO ADJUST THE ADJUST THE PLAT TO THE NEGOTIATED EASEMENT. YEAH. JUST TO KIND OF MODIFY THE EASEMENTS THAT ARE SHOWN ON IT NOW TO PRIMARILY THE STORM EASEMENTS, BECAUSE THEY SHOWED A LOT OF PUBLIC ONES. AND THROUGH TALKING WITH THEM, NOT ALL OF THEM NEED TO BE PUBLIC. SO THAT'S ACTUALLY A REDUCTION IN THE CITY'S MAINTENANCE. I BELIEVE THAT'S A BENEFIT. AND THEN AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, THE POTENTIAL FOR SOME JOINT USE ACCESS EASEMENTS, BUT THAT IS LIKELY GOING TO ACTUALLY BE HANDLED THROUGH DECLARATIONS ON THE FINAL PLAT. THANK YOU. THEN I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. OH, IT'S ALREADY BEEN SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER TERRY, BUT WE'LL ADD YOU AS A PLUS ONE IN A LITTLE BIT. ANY COMMISSION ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION. NO QUESTIONS. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. THOSE OPPOSED THAT THAT PASSES 6 TO 1 WITH COMMISSIONER MYERS SAYING NO. ALRIGHTY. ITEM 11 IS CONSIDERATION. DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON A COORDINATED SIGN PLAN FOR 13207 PARK LANE. OR, AS YOU WOULD WANT TO SAY, BOIS D'ARC LANE.
THIS IS FOR ELEVATE SIGN GROUP, ALSO KNOWN AS THE OWNER, AS 13400 HIGHWAY 298 GV, LLC.
LET'S TALK ABOUT THIS. IT'S NOT THE CHEWY'S SIGN. IT'S JUST ACCORDING TO SIGN PLAN THAT HAPPENS TO INVOLVE SO MANY SIGN TYPES. THAT WOULD BE THE NEXT ONE. OH JUST KIDDING. SO THIS ONE TWO SIGN TYPES WITHIN THIS COORDINATED SIGN PLAN. SO THIS IS FOR THE I MEAN THE STAFF HAS THE PRESIDENTIAL STORAGE, BUT IT WILL BE PUBLIC STORAGE AS THE COMMERCIAL. OH YES. SO THIS IS THE STORAGE PROPERTY THAT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION BEHIND THE MINIMAX TRAVEL CENTER THERE AT 90. SO INCLUDES A NUMBER OF SIGNS, THE MAIN ONES BEING. THERE ARE THREE MAIN SIGNS ON
[01:05:02]
KIND OF SMALL, BUT THERE'S TWO LARGE BUILDINGS AND THEN TWO SMALLER BUILDINGS. DO YOU WANT TO CALL OUT THE. SORRY TO CUT YOU OFF, BUT DO YOU MIND CALLING OUT THE. PROBABLY THE ILLUMINATE THE. THERE'S TWO ILLUMINATED SIGNS AND THEN NON ILLUMINATED SIGN ON THE FACADE.CORRECT? CORRECT. YES. YEAH. SO THE NON-ILLUMINATED ONE WILL FACE BOTH ARC. SO THAT'S UNDER THEIR BUILDING A AND THEN ALSO ON BUILDING A IS SIGN B WHICH IS ILLUMINATED. AND THAT FACES US. 290. BUT THROUGH THE TRAVEL CENTER PROPERTY. AND THEN THE OTHER ILLUMINATED SIGN D THEY DON'T HAVE A SIGN. C JUST SKIPS THE D THAT IS ON THE BACKSIDE OF BUILDING D, E I KNOW IT FACES EAST. SO AS YOU'RE COMING DOWN TO 90 FROM ELGIN, THAT'S THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING YOU WOULD SEE. SO THAT'S WHERE THEY YOU KNOW THEY WANT THEIR LARGER SIGNS, THEIR BRANDING, THEIR.
THERE ARE SOME SMALLER SIGNS THAT THEY INCLUDED. OOPS, SKIPPING TOO MUCH. THAT SORT OF DESIGNATES SOME OF THE USES WITHIN THERE. BUT THEY'RE NOT ILLUMINATED. SO THEY'RE LIKE KIND OF OVER DOORS OVER SOME OF THE BAYS, BUT THEY HAVE THREE PRIMARY SIGNS FOR PUBLIC STORAGE, ONE NON-ILLUMINATED, ONE FACING AND TWO ILLUMINATED SIGNS, ONE FACING DIRECTLY FACING US, 290 AND THEN ONE ON THE EAST FACADE THAT YOU WOULD SEE AS YOU DRIVE DOWN TO 90 AND THROUGH THE COORDINATED SIGN PLAN. THE THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT THESE BUILDINGS ARE ALLOWED. THIS COORDINATE SIGN PLAN IS ACTUALLY LESS SQUARE FOOTAGE THAN THAT. BUT THROUGH THE COORDINATED SIGN PLAN, THEY'RE ABLE TO. ACCRUE SIGN FROM BUILDINGS AND PUT IT ON OTHERS. AND SO THERE'S BUILT BUILDINGS WITHIN THIS PROPERTY THAT DON'T HAVE SIGNS. SO IT'S TYPICALLY THE. SORRY, I'M SCROLLING TOO MUCH. THE THE INTERIOR ONES AND THE, THE LIKE. THE SMALLER UNITS THAT HAVE STORAGE UNITS THAT DON'T HAVE INTERIOR HALLWAYS. AND SO THEY'RE BASICALLY TAKING THE SIGNAGE THAT THOSE BUILDINGS WOULD HAVE, PUTTING IT INTO ESSENTIALLY THOSE THREE SIGNS. SO THOSE ARE, YOU KNOW, BUILDINGS A AND B AND C AND D, D HAVE, YOU KNOW, MORE SIGNAGE THAN CODE WOULD ALLOW. BUT OVERALL THROUGH THE PROPERTY, THEY'RE ACTUALLY HAVE LESS SIGNAGE THROUGH THEM. SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.
THANK YOU. SO SIGNAGE IN THE AGGREGATE IS BELOW OUR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS. A BUILDING A WILL BE CONCENTRATED AS WELL AS. AND THEN BUILDING D WILL HAVE THE OTHER ONE THE OTHER ELIMINATED. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT? NO. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON ITEM 11. I MOVE. WE APPROVE THE COORDINATED SIGN PLAN FOR AGENDA ITEM 11. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TERRY TO APPROVE ITEM 11. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND, I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PIES. ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION? ANY CHANGES? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED THAT? MOTION PASSES SEVEN ZERO. OUR FINAL ITEM THIS EVENING IS ITEM 12 CONSIDERATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON AN AMENDMENT TO PHONE CALLS ON AN AMENDMENT TO A COORDINATED SIGN PLAN FOR THE SHOPPES AT LAS ENTRADAS AND BEING LOCATED AT 12420 TILLGANG PASS. THIS IS APPLICANT ARTEC SIGNS THE OWNER. OUR FRIENDS HERE LVEREGLP STAFF. THIS HAS LOTS OF VERSIONS ONE THROUGH FIVE, SIX AND SEVEN. YES. SO THIS ONE, THIS COORDINATED SIGN PLAN WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED IN NOVEMBER OF 2024. SEEMS TO BE A WHILE. AND SO AS TENANTS COME IN THIS FAIRLY FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHERE WE DO THIS COORDINATED SIGN PLANS, AND THEN TENANTS COME IN AND THEY HAVE THEIR SPECIFIC SIGNAGE THAT, YOU KNOW, THEY FEEL DOESN'T ISN'T MET BY THE COORDINATED SIGN PLAN. AND SO WE'LL WORK WITH THEM TO, YOU KNOW, SEE IF IT CAN WORK WITH UNDER THE PLAN OR IF AMENDMENTS ARE WARRANTED. AND SO HERE THERE WERE SOME REASONABLE REQUESTS. SO WE'RE BRINGING BEFORE YOU ALL AS AN AMENDMENT. SO THEY HAVE TWO BUILDINGS SHOPS ONE AND SHOPS TWO SHOPS.
ONE IS THE ONE WE'VE PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED WITH THAT MEDICAL OFFICE USE IN IT. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN, THERE'S THE ONE ON THE LEFT IS HOW IT IS CURRENTLY APPROVED. AND ON THE RIGHT IS WHAT THE REQUEST IS. AS YOU CAN SEE, THEY'RE ADDING THREE ADDITIONAL SIGNS ON THE EAST, WEST AND NORTH, I THOUGHT. AND THEN HERE FOR SHOPS TWO, THERE ARE FOUR SIGNS ON THE
[01:10:05]
SOUTH FACADE. SO THAT'S THE ONE THAT FACES 290. AND THEN THEY'RE ADDING A SIGN ON THE EAST AND WEST FACADE. SO THERE'S ONE ON THE WEST FACADE AND THREE ON THE EAST FACADE.AND THE REASONS. SO FOR SHOPS ONE, THE ONE OF THE TENANTS HAS, YOU KNOW, PARTICULARLY LOGOS THAT THEY NEED. AND SO THIS DIDN'T INCORPORATE ANY ALLOWANCE FOR A LOGO. AND SO YOU CAN SEE HERE IT'S STILL CHANNEL LETTER SIGNS, WHICH IS WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY CONTEMPLATED. THAT DOESN'T CHANGE, BUT IT ALLOWS FOR A LOGO TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THAT. THAT ISN'T NECESSARILY, YOU KNOW, EXCEEDINGLY LARGER THAN THE, THE CHANNEL ITSELF, BUT IT DOES ALLOW FOR MORE THAN JUST THE BRAND'S NAME. IT HAS A LOGO THAT CAN BE INCORPORATED.
AND THEN THE SIGNS THAT ARE ON THE EAST AND THE NORTH FACADE, THOSE ARE THE ONES SPECIFIC TO THE CHEWY'S THAT IS SUPPOSED TO GO IN THERE. AND THOSE THEY ARE REQUESTING SOME DEVIATIONS, AS CHEWY'S DOES HAVE BRAND SPECIFIC SIGNAGE. AND SO WHAT STAFF IS REQUESTING. SO IN THE SUMMARY FORM I HAD REFERENCED SIGNED SH SIX. I'M ACTUALLY GOING TO EXPAND IT TO INCLUDE BOTH SH SIX AND SH SEVEN. SO IF YOU ARE LOOKING TO APPROVE WE'RE WILLING TO APPROVE THIS.
I WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS THAT SIGNS SH SIX AND SEVEN ARE ONLY APPLICABLE TO THE, YOU KNOW, CURRENT TENANT. SO THAT WAY IF ANOTHER TEN COME IN THOSE TYPES OF SIGNS, IF THEY WANTED TO CONTINUE, THEY'D HAVE TO COME BACK AND ASK YOU ALL THOSE TWO SIGNS. SH SIX. AND YOU CAN SEE HERE THE THREE SIGNS RELATED TO THAT TENANT, THE SIGN ON THE FRONT, SH454 SORRY IS THE STANDARD CHANNEL LETTER. SO THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING WILL HAVE THE SAME TYPE OF SIGNS, ALL CHANNEL LETTER SIGNAGE. BUT THE SIGN ON THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING WHICH FACES BREAKS PLUS, AND THE SIGN ON THE BACK OF THE BUILDING WHICH FACES INTO THEIR PARKING LOT. AND THE FUTURE THIRD PHASE. AND THEN MINOR GRAND. THOSE WOULD BE CHEWY'S BRANDED TYPE SIGNS, WHICH AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, THIS IS A PROJECTING SIGN WITH NEON TUBING. AND THE ONE ON THE BACK SH7 WOULD ALSO BE A NEON SIGN. IT WOULDN'T BE PROJECTING, IT WOULD BE ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING. BUT THAT'S WHAT THE NON STANDARD IS TO ALLOW FOR THESE NEON TYPE SIGNS. THAT WOULD BE UNDER MY RECOMMENDATION ONLY APPLICABLE TO CHEWY'S. AND SO IF ANOTHER RESTAURANT COMES IN THERE SOMETIME IN THE FUTURE AND THEY WANTED NON STANDARD SIGNAGE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK TO US PLANNING COMMISSION AND REQUEST THAT. AND THEN FOR SHOPS TWO THIS ONE IT DIDN'T THIS FACADE HERE THIS WEST FACADE THAT FACES. 290 AS YOU'RE COMING INTO MANER FROM AUSTIN. AND SO THE TENANT THERE ON THE CORNER USUALLY CORNER SPACES, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE THEY'RE MORE DESIRABLE BECAUSE YOU, YOU HAVE MORE FACADE REAL ESTATE, BUT THE PREVIOUS, THE APPROVED CURRENT SIGN PLAN DOESN'T INCLUDE ANY SIGNAGE ON THE SIDE THERE. AND SO IT WAS REASONABLE TO HAVE A STANDARD CHANNEL LETTER TYPE SIGN ON THE SIDE AS WELL FOR THAT TENANT. AND THEN HERE ON THE EAST FACADE, THERE WAS NO SIGNAGE, BUT THERE ARE TENANTS THAT ONLY ACCESS THROUGH THIS SIDE. AND SO WITHOUT AMENDING THE SIGN PLAN, THOSE PARTICULAR TENANTS, WHICH THERE COULD POTENTIALLY BE THREE, WOULD NOT BE AFFORDED ANY SIGNAGE ABOVE THEIR FRONT DOORS OR REALLY ANYWHERE ON THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE SIGNAGE IS ASSIGNED TO OTHER TENANT SPACES. AND AGAIN, THESE WOULD BE THE STANDARD CHANNEL LETTER SIGNS. AND SO WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH THE CONDITION THAT SIGNS SH SIX AND SH SEVEN ONLY APPLY TO THE CURRENT TENANT. THANK I WILL ELIMINATE THESE WILL BE THAT THOSE NON TRADITIONAL SIGNS IN THE CITY MANNER WOULD BE BELOW OUR LIMITS. THEY WOULD BE WITHIN OUR LIMITS REQUIREMENTS. SO WHAT WAS THE QUESTION LIKE THIS BLADE SIGN OF THE CHEWY'S. THE SH SIX. THAT WOULD BE EVEN WHEN IT'S NOT GOING TO BE 9000 LUMENS. LIGHTING UP THE NIGHT SKY IN RED, YELLOW AND BLUE. IT'LL JUST BE IT'LL BE LIKE SCOPED DECENTLY, YOU KNOW? I MEAN, YOU KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. YES I DO. I'LL HAVE TO.
OUR SIGN CODE DOES LIKE IF I GET A IF I TAKE A PICTURE ON THE STREET OR ON THE HIGHWAY AND I AND I GET YELLOW GLOW FROM THERE, IT'S A LITTLE TOO BRIGHT. LIKE I WANT TO MAKE SURE IT'S NOT. IT DOESN'T LOOK EXCEEDINGLY BRIGHT. ANYWAY. YEAH, IT'S A RANDOM QUESTION.
I'M NOT SURE IT'S WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE SIGN. IF THE, YOU KNOW, IF IT'S LUMENS OR THE INTENSITY OF THE SIGN IS INCLUDED WITHIN THIS, I DON'T BELIEVE OUR SIGN CODE HAS THAT
[01:15:08]
EITHER. WE DO REGULATE LIGHTING ON PROPERTY, BUT LIGHTING FOR SIGNAGE IS ACTUALLY EXEMPT FROM YOUR OVERALL LUMENS ON A PROPERTY. I KNOW THAT I'VE TALKED ABOUT LUMENS BEFORE. I'M NOT JUST GREAT. I DON'T JUST SIT THERE AND DREAM OF IT IN MY AFTERNOONS, BUT MAYBE. OKAY.BUT AS YOU SAID. SH SEVEN AND SH6, SH6 AND SEVEN ARE RECOMMENDED BY STAFF TO BE SCOPED SOLELY TO THE CURRENT TENANT OF THAT OF THAT UNIT IN SHOPS TO. OH YEAH. NOT TO SAY ANYTHING OR NOT. I'M SORRY, I PUT A YELLOW SLIP UP THERE. OH YEAH. I'M SO SORRY. OH THAT'S OKAY. ARE YOU PAUL OTTO. NOPE. YEAH. ARE WE ALREADY DID PAUL. OTTO. JAMIE. MIDDLE. YEAH YEAH YEAH YEAH. I'M JAMIE WITH ART TECH. THANK YOU. IT DOESN'T CALL FOR NEON. IT'S ACTUALLY FAUX NEON LED TUBING. OH YEAH. BECAUSE IT'S THE 20 MINUTE AND LUMEN OUTPUTS CAN BE ADJUSTED.
AND TYPICALLY IT'S IN THE SAME CATEGORY AS ANY KIND OF INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED LED SIGN.
OH, PERFECT. SO YOU MAKE ME SO HAPPY. YEAH. YOU MAKE ME SO HAPPY TO HEAR THAT. YEAH. SO WHO'S USING NEON STILL? JEFF. NOT EVEN THE ORIGINAL CHEWY'S. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO. I'M THE ONLY ONE THINKING ABOUT LUMENS IN MY SLEEP. ALL RIGHT, WE'LL ASK HIM WHAT KIND OF DIODES HE'S USING, TOO. NO, THAT'S TOO MUCH. ALL RIGHT. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON ITEM 12. I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER 12 WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE SIGN LABELED AS SH SIX AND SH SEVEN ONLY APPLY TO THE CURRENTLY PROPOSED TENANT, AND THAT ANY FUTURE TENANTS OF SHOPS, ONE WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED A SIGN IN THAT LOCATION. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TERRY TO APPROVE ITEM 12 ON THE CONDITION THAT SH 7SH6 ONLY APPLY TO THE CURRENT PROPOSED TENANT AND ANY FUTURE TENANT OR OTHER TENANT THAT IS NOT THE CURRENT PROPOSED TENANT OF CHEWY'S. AND IT'S COMPANY AS AS INCORPORATED WOULD REQUIRE ADDITIONAL OR FUTURE APPROVAL BY THIS BODY. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PIES.
DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS TO THE MOTION OR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES? SEEING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED THAT? MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0. THAT CONCLUDES THE AGENDA FOR THIS EVENING, AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN US AT 748. MOTION TO ADJOURN AT 748. MOTION BY TERRY. SECOND. SECOND. SECOND BY MEYER. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND. THERE WE GO.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.